Regional disparities on contraceptive intention and its sociodemographic determinants among reproductive women in Nigeria.

IF 1.9 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Contraception and reproductive medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1186/s40834-025-00342-x
Jamilu Sani, Alabi Olatunji Oluyomi, Ismail Garba Wali, Mohamed Mustaf Ahmed, Salad Halane
{"title":"Regional disparities on contraceptive intention and its sociodemographic determinants among reproductive women in Nigeria.","authors":"Jamilu Sani, Alabi Olatunji Oluyomi, Ismail Garba Wali, Mohamed Mustaf Ahmed, Salad Halane","doi":"10.1186/s40834-025-00342-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite efforts to improve its uptake, contraceptive use in Nigeria remains low. Understanding regional disparities and sociodemographic determinants of contraceptive intention is crucial for developing effective family planning strategies. This study aimed to investigate these factors in women of reproductive age in Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study analysed data from 36,179 women aged 15-49 participating in the 2018 Nigerian Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS). Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between sociodemographic factors and contraceptive use intention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of contraceptive intentions was 39.18%, with significant regional variation. South East had the highest intention at 44.85%, while North East had the lowest intention at 34.76%. Education was a strong predictor, with those with higher education showing 2.657 times greater odds of using contraception (AOR: 2.657, 95% CI: 2.339-3.019, p < 0.001). Muslim women and rural residents exhibited lower odds of intention, while women aged 20-24 years had the highest odds (AOR: 1.305, 95% CI: 1.187-1.435, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were significant regional disparities and complex sociodemographic patterns in contraceptive intention among Nigerian women. Tailored interventions addressing educational, religious, economic, and geographical barriers are required to increase contraceptive uptake and improve reproductive health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00342-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite efforts to improve its uptake, contraceptive use in Nigeria remains low. Understanding regional disparities and sociodemographic determinants of contraceptive intention is crucial for developing effective family planning strategies. This study aimed to investigate these factors in women of reproductive age in Nigeria.

Methods: This cross-sectional study analysed data from 36,179 women aged 15-49 participating in the 2018 Nigerian Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS). Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between sociodemographic factors and contraceptive use intention.

Results: The overall prevalence of contraceptive intentions was 39.18%, with significant regional variation. South East had the highest intention at 44.85%, while North East had the lowest intention at 34.76%. Education was a strong predictor, with those with higher education showing 2.657 times greater odds of using contraception (AOR: 2.657, 95% CI: 2.339-3.019, p < 0.001). Muslim women and rural residents exhibited lower odds of intention, while women aged 20-24 years had the highest odds (AOR: 1.305, 95% CI: 1.187-1.435, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: There were significant regional disparities and complex sociodemographic patterns in contraceptive intention among Nigerian women. Tailored interventions addressing educational, religious, economic, and geographical barriers are required to increase contraceptive uptake and improve reproductive health outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚生殖妇女在避孕意向及其社会人口决定因素方面的地区差异。
背景:尽管尼日利亚努力提高避孕措施的使用率,但避孕措施的使用率仍然很低。了解避孕意愿的地区差异和社会人口决定因素对于制定有效的计划生育战略至关重要。本研究旨在调查尼日利亚育龄妇女的这些因素。方法:本横断面研究分析了参加2018年尼日利亚人口与健康调查(NDHS)的36,179名15-49岁女性的数据。进行双变量和多变量logistic回归分析,以评估社会人口因素与避孕药具使用意愿之间的关系。结果:总体避孕意愿患病率为39.18%,地区差异显著。东南地区的意向最高,为44.85%,东北地区的意向最低,为34.76%。教育程度是一个强有力的预测因素,受过高等教育的妇女使用避孕措施的几率是前者的2.657倍(AOR: 2.657, 95% CI: 2.339-3.019, p)。结论:尼日利亚妇女避孕意愿存在显著的地区差异和复杂的社会人口统计学模式。需要有针对性的干预措施,解决教育、宗教、经济和地理障碍,以增加避孕药具的使用并改善生殖健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sexual autonomy and contraceptive use among married or cohabiting female youth: insights from recent Ghana demographic and health survey. Vasectomy knowledge, attitudes, and intentions among men in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effect of the timing of surgical treatment of hydrosalpinx on in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic single-sperm injection pregnancy outcomes in patients with tubal factor infertility. A mixed-methods cross-sectional study on early contraceptive implant removal and its associated factors among women implanted attending family planning settings in Bangladesh. Exploring service providers' perspectives on facilitators and barriers to contraceptive uptake among women: implications for policy reform in Ghana.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1