Equity zone policies in Baltimore City for shared E-scooters: Notes from the field

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2025.101995
Andrew Hellinger , Johnathon P. Ehsani , Jeffrey Michael , Meg Young
{"title":"Equity zone policies in Baltimore City for shared E-scooters: Notes from the field","authors":"Andrew Hellinger ,&nbsp;Johnathon P. Ehsani ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Michael ,&nbsp;Meg Young","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.101995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>E-scooters are transforming urban environments by improving mobility for those without access to a motor vehicle or in areas underserved by transit. Shared e-scooters are not often distributed equitably throughout cities, so state and local policies that govern their distribution could be a viable public health intervention that helps create a more equitable transportation system. Baltimore City, Maryland, USA requires shared e-scooter vendors to deploy e-scooters to predefined equity zones at the beginning of each day. This study reports on the equity zone policies established by Baltimore City, shared e-scooter use in these equity zones, and suggestions for improvement from shared e-scooter users.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We worked with two shared e-scooter vendors to survey e-scooter users who began their ride in one of the equity zones defined by Baltimore City. The survey included questions about the frequency and purpose of their shared e-scooter use, the availability of alternate transportation options, and how likely proposed changes to e-scooters and the road environment would increase their use of shared e-scooters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Valid survey responses were obtained from 98 individuals. Most respondents reported using shared e-scooters at least a few times a week, and over half of all respondents reported travelling for work or school on their e-scooter trip. Most participants agreed that shared e-scooters make it possible to get to places they otherwise couldn't go and easier to get to places they need to go. When asked what changes would increase their shared e-scooter ridership, respondents favored making shared e-scooter rentals less expensive, adding dedicated e-scooter/bicycle lanes, allowing riders to carry things more easily on e-scooters, and increasing shared e-scooter availability.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Our findings suggest that e-scooters are being utilized in equity zones, helping facilitate travel and access to work and school destinations. Similar policy approaches can help improve transportation equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101995"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

E-scooters are transforming urban environments by improving mobility for those without access to a motor vehicle or in areas underserved by transit. Shared e-scooters are not often distributed equitably throughout cities, so state and local policies that govern their distribution could be a viable public health intervention that helps create a more equitable transportation system. Baltimore City, Maryland, USA requires shared e-scooter vendors to deploy e-scooters to predefined equity zones at the beginning of each day. This study reports on the equity zone policies established by Baltimore City, shared e-scooter use in these equity zones, and suggestions for improvement from shared e-scooter users.

Methods

We worked with two shared e-scooter vendors to survey e-scooter users who began their ride in one of the equity zones defined by Baltimore City. The survey included questions about the frequency and purpose of their shared e-scooter use, the availability of alternate transportation options, and how likely proposed changes to e-scooters and the road environment would increase their use of shared e-scooters.

Results

Valid survey responses were obtained from 98 individuals. Most respondents reported using shared e-scooters at least a few times a week, and over half of all respondents reported travelling for work or school on their e-scooter trip. Most participants agreed that shared e-scooters make it possible to get to places they otherwise couldn't go and easier to get to places they need to go. When asked what changes would increase their shared e-scooter ridership, respondents favored making shared e-scooter rentals less expensive, adding dedicated e-scooter/bicycle lanes, allowing riders to carry things more easily on e-scooters, and increasing shared e-scooter availability.

Discussion

Our findings suggest that e-scooters are being utilized in equity zones, helping facilitate travel and access to work and school destinations. Similar policy approaches can help improve transportation equity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
‘By us, for us’; Co-designing disability inclusion training for bus drivers Perceived parental barriers to children's walking to school in a sprawled city: A case study for Najran City, Saudi Arabia Effects of demand-responsive transport on daily waking steps in Senboku New-Town: A cohort study using propensity score matching Equity zone policies in Baltimore City for shared E-scooters: Notes from the field Exploring travel behaviour using a gamified web-based application “Catch the Bus©”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1