Jason M.L. Miller , Benjamin R. Thompson , James T. Handa , Philip Luthert , Usha Chakravarthy , Karl G. Csaky , Alan Bird , Benjamin K. Young , Sudha K. Iyengar , Jiwon Baek , Moussa A. Zouache , Burt T. Richards , Gregory S. Hageman , Gerry Rodrigues , Kapil Bharti , John G. Flannery , Michael B. Gorin , Catherine Bowes Rickman
{"title":"Dissecting the biological complexity of age-related macular degeneration: Is it one disease, multiple separate diseases, or a spectrum?","authors":"Jason M.L. Miller , Benjamin R. Thompson , James T. Handa , Philip Luthert , Usha Chakravarthy , Karl G. Csaky , Alan Bird , Benjamin K. Young , Sudha K. Iyengar , Jiwon Baek , Moussa A. Zouache , Burt T. Richards , Gregory S. Hageman , Gerry Rodrigues , Kapil Bharti , John G. Flannery , Michael B. Gorin , Catherine Bowes Rickman","doi":"10.1016/j.exer.2025.110304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Clinicians recognize the heterogeneity of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in presentation, progression, and treatment response, as well as the challenges in distinguishing it from other macular degenerations. As part of the 2024 Ryan Initiative for Macular Research meeting, a group of clinician-scientists and basic scientists were convened to consider the question of whether AMD should be classified as a single disorder or a spectrum of conditions. To answer this question, we reviewed research on several “dimensions” that constitute AMD risk or pathogenesis: genetics, ancestry, retinal imaging findings, diet and environment, aging, and outer retinal molecular and cellular pathways. The group reached a consensus that AMD represents a heterogeneous collection of disease states arising from the interplay of these dimensions. This heterogeneity can be conceived of as a “cloud” of AMD phenotypes. Defining subtypes within this “cloud” requires longitudinal cohorts of well-genotyped and phenotyped patients who progress from no AMD through late AMD, analyzed by unsupervised learning. Comparing the AMD subtypes that emerge from this analysis, especially -omics data from each subtype, will illuminate biology that is applicable to certain subtypes of AMD patients and molecular pathogenic mechanisms that universally apply to all AMD. This knowledge will, in turn, drive improved drug development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12177,"journal":{"name":"Experimental eye research","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 110304"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental eye research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014483525000752","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Clinicians recognize the heterogeneity of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in presentation, progression, and treatment response, as well as the challenges in distinguishing it from other macular degenerations. As part of the 2024 Ryan Initiative for Macular Research meeting, a group of clinician-scientists and basic scientists were convened to consider the question of whether AMD should be classified as a single disorder or a spectrum of conditions. To answer this question, we reviewed research on several “dimensions” that constitute AMD risk or pathogenesis: genetics, ancestry, retinal imaging findings, diet and environment, aging, and outer retinal molecular and cellular pathways. The group reached a consensus that AMD represents a heterogeneous collection of disease states arising from the interplay of these dimensions. This heterogeneity can be conceived of as a “cloud” of AMD phenotypes. Defining subtypes within this “cloud” requires longitudinal cohorts of well-genotyped and phenotyped patients who progress from no AMD through late AMD, analyzed by unsupervised learning. Comparing the AMD subtypes that emerge from this analysis, especially -omics data from each subtype, will illuminate biology that is applicable to certain subtypes of AMD patients and molecular pathogenic mechanisms that universally apply to all AMD. This knowledge will, in turn, drive improved drug development.
期刊介绍:
The primary goal of Experimental Eye Research is to publish original research papers on all aspects of experimental biology of the eye and ocular tissues that seek to define the mechanisms of normal function and/or disease. Studies of ocular tissues that encompass the disciplines of cell biology, developmental biology, genetics, molecular biology, physiology, biochemistry, biophysics, immunology or microbiology are most welcomed. Manuscripts that are purely clinical or in a surgical area of ophthalmology are not appropriate for submission to Experimental Eye Research and if received will be returned without review.