Germán Andrés Alarcón Garavito, Katie Gilchrist, Coziana Ciurtin, Sanjay Khanna, Pinkie Chambers, Nick McNally, Edward Merivale, Edi Carr, Rosamund Yu, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
{"title":"Enablers and barriers of clinical trial participation in adult patients from minority ethnic groups: a systematic review.","authors":"Germán Andrés Alarcón Garavito, Katie Gilchrist, Coziana Ciurtin, Sanjay Khanna, Pinkie Chambers, Nick McNally, Edward Merivale, Edi Carr, Rosamund Yu, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-08769-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials are essential to the development of healthcare innovations that advance life expectancy and improve quality of life. However, there exists a pronounced disparity in ethnic representation among trial participants. This imbalance, particularly in relation to minority ethnic groups, can lead to a limited understanding of how therapies affect diverse populations. The present systematic literature review (SLR) aims to identify the factors that both hinder and facilitate the participation of minority ethnic groups in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review involved a systematic search of keywords across four databases: Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL Plus and The Cochrane Library. The review was not restricted by language or study site; however, the date of publication was limited between 1st January 2017 and 1st October 2022. Studies discussing or outlining the involvement of minority ethnic groups in clinical trials, and those outlining inclusive recruitment and participation procedures were targeted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43 articles were included in the review. Of these, 36 articles were from the United States (US), 20 articles reported on oncology trials and 39 articles reported information from the patient's perspective. Reported barriers included a lack of researchers from minority ethnic groups implementing and conducting clinical research, inadequate funding for clinical trial efforts in geographical areas serving minority populations and a lack of awareness and education among research staff regarding which underrepresented groups to target for recruitment and the strategies to employ in reaching out to them. Several recommendations were suggested by the articles included in the review to address these barriers. Prominently, the use of patient navigators or community liaison roles was highly recommended as a way of supporting patients through the research recruitment process. The articles also highlighted the benefits of translating study materials and interventions into multiple languages and actively involving diverse communities in the development of health education materials. Lastly, leveraging technologies to address socioeconomic barriers, such as the use of virtual approaches to avoid lengthy travel, may also help to improve diversity in trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ensuring representation of minority ethnic groups in clinical trials is critical to developing therapies with generalisable efficacies. While progress has been made in enhancing outreach of wider racial groups and fortifying educational resources, there remains a pressing need to delve deeper into the obstacles impeding the recruitment of a diverse participant base, particularly in regions outside the US, where relevant studies are scarce.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022368106) (1).</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08769-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Clinical trials are essential to the development of healthcare innovations that advance life expectancy and improve quality of life. However, there exists a pronounced disparity in ethnic representation among trial participants. This imbalance, particularly in relation to minority ethnic groups, can lead to a limited understanding of how therapies affect diverse populations. The present systematic literature review (SLR) aims to identify the factors that both hinder and facilitate the participation of minority ethnic groups in clinical trials.
Methods: This review involved a systematic search of keywords across four databases: Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL Plus and The Cochrane Library. The review was not restricted by language or study site; however, the date of publication was limited between 1st January 2017 and 1st October 2022. Studies discussing or outlining the involvement of minority ethnic groups in clinical trials, and those outlining inclusive recruitment and participation procedures were targeted.
Results: A total of 43 articles were included in the review. Of these, 36 articles were from the United States (US), 20 articles reported on oncology trials and 39 articles reported information from the patient's perspective. Reported barriers included a lack of researchers from minority ethnic groups implementing and conducting clinical research, inadequate funding for clinical trial efforts in geographical areas serving minority populations and a lack of awareness and education among research staff regarding which underrepresented groups to target for recruitment and the strategies to employ in reaching out to them. Several recommendations were suggested by the articles included in the review to address these barriers. Prominently, the use of patient navigators or community liaison roles was highly recommended as a way of supporting patients through the research recruitment process. The articles also highlighted the benefits of translating study materials and interventions into multiple languages and actively involving diverse communities in the development of health education materials. Lastly, leveraging technologies to address socioeconomic barriers, such as the use of virtual approaches to avoid lengthy travel, may also help to improve diversity in trials.
Conclusions: Ensuring representation of minority ethnic groups in clinical trials is critical to developing therapies with generalisable efficacies. While progress has been made in enhancing outreach of wider racial groups and fortifying educational resources, there remains a pressing need to delve deeper into the obstacles impeding the recruitment of a diverse participant base, particularly in regions outside the US, where relevant studies are scarce.
Registration: The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022368106) (1).
背景:临床试验对医疗保健创新的发展至关重要,可以延长预期寿命,提高生活质量。然而,在试验参与者中存在明显的种族代表性差异。这种不平衡,特别是在少数民族群体中,可能导致对治疗如何影响不同人群的理解有限。本系统文献综述(SLR)旨在找出阻碍和促进少数民族群体参与临床试验的因素。方法:本综述系统检索了四个数据库中的关键词:Web of Science、PubMed、CINAHL Plus和Cochrane Library。该综述不受语言或研究地点的限制;但是,发布日期限制在2017年1月1日至2022年10月1日之间。研究的目标是讨论或概述少数民族群体参与临床试验,以及概述包容性招募和参与程序的研究。结果:共纳入43篇文献。其中,36篇文章来自美国,20篇文章报道肿瘤试验,39篇文章从患者的角度报道信息。报告的障碍包括缺乏来自少数民族群体的研究人员实施和开展临床研究,在为少数民族人口服务的地理区域为临床试验工作提供的资金不足,以及研究人员缺乏认识和教育,不知道应该针对哪些代表性不足的群体进行招聘,也不知道在接触这些群体时应采用何种战略。审查中包括的文章提出了几项建议,以解决这些障碍。突出的是,强烈建议使用患者导航员或社区联络员的角色,作为在研究招募过程中支持患者的一种方式。这些文章还强调了将学习材料和干预措施翻译成多种语言以及让不同社区积极参与编写卫生教育材料的好处。最后,利用技术来解决社会经济障碍,例如使用虚拟方法来避免长途旅行,也可能有助于提高试验的多样性。结论:确保少数民族在临床试验中的代表性对于开发具有普遍疗效的治疗方法至关重要。虽然在扩大更广泛的种族群体和加强教育资源方面取得了进展,但仍然迫切需要深入研究阻碍招募多样化参与者基础的障碍,特别是在美国以外的地区,相关研究很少。注册:审查方案在PROSPERO上注册(CRD42022368106)(1)。
期刊介绍:
Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.