Prediction of the full debonding process of mixed-adhesive FRP-to-substrate joints through a new analytical method

IF 5.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS Engineering Fracture Mechanics Pub Date : 2025-04-15 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.110963
Hugo C. Biscaia , Dilum Fernando , Jian-Guo Dai
{"title":"Prediction of the full debonding process of mixed-adhesive FRP-to-substrate joints through a new analytical method","authors":"Hugo C. Biscaia ,&nbsp;Dilum Fernando ,&nbsp;Jian-Guo Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.110963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rehabilitation and retrofitting of existing structures using externally bonded fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) have become increasingly popular. A common failure mode in such strengthened systems is the debonding of the FRP laminate from the substrate. To address this, various techniques have been developed to prevent or delay debonding failures. One such approach is the use of two adhesives with different elastic moduli, resulting in a mixed-adhesive joint. This technique is claimed to reduce stress concentrations at the plate ends, thereby delaying or preventing debonding failures. However, a detailed interfacial stress analysis, considering failure initiation and propagation within the bonded joint, has yet to be conducted to fully understand the effects of using a mixed adhesive. To address this gap, the present work proposes an analytical solution to describe the complete debonding process of FRP mixed-adhesive joints under mode II loading. This analytical solution is validated using the Finite Element Method (FEM), and several key parameters for mixed-adhesive joint design are identified. The results indicate that mixed-adhesive joints, compared to single-adhesive joints with a ductile adhesive, exhibit lower maximum load capacities. When the ductile adhesive is used as a loaded-end anchorage in the mixed-adhesive joint, the maximum load is higher than when it is used as an end anchorage. However, this configuration significantly reduces the ductility of the joint with the loaded-end anchorage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11576,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","volume":"318 ","pages":"Article 110963"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001379442500164X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rehabilitation and retrofitting of existing structures using externally bonded fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) have become increasingly popular. A common failure mode in such strengthened systems is the debonding of the FRP laminate from the substrate. To address this, various techniques have been developed to prevent or delay debonding failures. One such approach is the use of two adhesives with different elastic moduli, resulting in a mixed-adhesive joint. This technique is claimed to reduce stress concentrations at the plate ends, thereby delaying or preventing debonding failures. However, a detailed interfacial stress analysis, considering failure initiation and propagation within the bonded joint, has yet to be conducted to fully understand the effects of using a mixed adhesive. To address this gap, the present work proposes an analytical solution to describe the complete debonding process of FRP mixed-adhesive joints under mode II loading. This analytical solution is validated using the Finite Element Method (FEM), and several key parameters for mixed-adhesive joint design are identified. The results indicate that mixed-adhesive joints, compared to single-adhesive joints with a ductile adhesive, exhibit lower maximum load capacities. When the ductile adhesive is used as a loaded-end anchorage in the mixed-adhesive joint, the maximum load is higher than when it is used as an end anchorage. However, this configuration significantly reduces the ductility of the joint with the loaded-end anchorage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用一种新的分析方法预测frp -基材混合粘结接头的完全脱粘过程
使用外部粘合纤维增强聚合物(FRP)对现有结构进行修复和改造已经越来越流行。在这种加固系统中,常见的失效模式是FRP层压板从基材上剥离。为了解决这个问题,已经开发了各种技术来防止或延迟脱粘失败。其中一种方法是使用两种具有不同弹性模量的粘合剂,从而形成混合粘合剂连接。该技术声称可以减少板端应力集中,从而延缓或防止脱粘失效。然而,详细的界面应力分析,考虑到粘结接头内的破坏开始和扩展,尚未进行,以充分了解使用混合粘合剂的影响。为了解决这一差距,本工作提出了一个解析解来描述II型加载下FRP混合胶接头的完整脱粘过程。利用有限元方法对该解析解进行了验证,并确定了混合粘接设计的几个关键参数。结果表明:混合粘结接头的最大承载能力比单粘结接头低;在混合粘接节点中使用延性胶粘剂作为加载端锚固时,最大载荷高于使用延性胶粘剂作为加载端锚固时。然而,这种结构显著降低了与加载端锚固连接的延性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
606
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: EFM covers a broad range of topics in fracture mechanics to be of interest and use to both researchers and practitioners. Contributions are welcome which address the fracture behavior of conventional engineering material systems as well as newly emerging material systems. Contributions on developments in the areas of mechanics and materials science strongly related to fracture mechanics are also welcome. Papers on fatigue are welcome if they treat the fatigue process using the methods of fracture mechanics.
期刊最新文献
Fracture analysis of mode III interface cracks in ultra-thin layered composite materials: theory and MATLAB code A new estimation of median crack length in scratching of brittle materials On the 1D homogeneous and localized solutions of variational phase field method for pressurized fracture Higher-order electromechanical fracture analysis: Single- and mixed-mode nanocracks in flexoelectric solids Experimental study on the effect of bending stress on rail RCF crack initiation and propagation behavior: Based on a newly designed rail specimen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1