Impact tensile test and numerical analysis of the dynamic behavior of sandstone ring specimens using a split Hopkinson hollow tensile bar

IF 4.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS Engineering Fracture Mechanics Pub Date : 2025-03-02 DOI:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.111004
Shi Liu , Chuanxin Cai , Shaoxu Hao , Yue Zhai , Xiquan Jiang , Xuqi Liang
{"title":"Impact tensile test and numerical analysis of the dynamic behavior of sandstone ring specimens using a split Hopkinson hollow tensile bar","authors":"Shi Liu ,&nbsp;Chuanxin Cai ,&nbsp;Shaoxu Hao ,&nbsp;Yue Zhai ,&nbsp;Xiquan Jiang ,&nbsp;Xuqi Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.111004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Most rock bodies encountered in underground engineering projects are subject to dynamic tensile conditions. The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of using hollow circular rock samples in a dynamic direct tensile test and assess the specimen’s dynamic tensile mechanical properties. We used 26 hollow ring red sandstone specimens (HRRSSs) with different strain rates (53.86 s<sup>−1</sup> to 104.44 s<sup>−1</sup> in dynamic direct tensile tests using a Split Hopkinson Hollow Tensile Bar (SHHTB) test system. Five parameters, i.e., the initial elastic modulus, elastoplastic modulus, ideal elastic energy, ideal elastic coefficient, and energy dissipation ratio, were used to identify five stress stages during loading. The parameters were used to analyze the stiffness and energy evolution of the HRRSSs during loading. Numerical methods were utilized to simulate the damage evolution and destruction of the 12 specimens under dynamic tensile loading. The experimental and numerical results showed that the hollow ring structure was reliable and effective in determining the dynamic and direct tensile mechanical properties of rock materials and expanded the upper limit of the strain rate. The direct tensile failure of the HRRSSs with a low strain rate was due to the connection of multiple weak surfaces, whereas that of the HRRSSs with a high strain rate occurred due to a central stress concentration area that consumed a large amount of plastic energy by penetrating a strong surface. The proposed testing method, specimen type, and analytical models can be used to investigate the mechanical properties of rocks using dynamic direct tensile tests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11576,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","volume":"319 ","pages":"Article 111004"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001379442500205X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most rock bodies encountered in underground engineering projects are subject to dynamic tensile conditions. The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of using hollow circular rock samples in a dynamic direct tensile test and assess the specimen’s dynamic tensile mechanical properties. We used 26 hollow ring red sandstone specimens (HRRSSs) with different strain rates (53.86 s−1 to 104.44 s−1 in dynamic direct tensile tests using a Split Hopkinson Hollow Tensile Bar (SHHTB) test system. Five parameters, i.e., the initial elastic modulus, elastoplastic modulus, ideal elastic energy, ideal elastic coefficient, and energy dissipation ratio, were used to identify five stress stages during loading. The parameters were used to analyze the stiffness and energy evolution of the HRRSSs during loading. Numerical methods were utilized to simulate the damage evolution and destruction of the 12 specimens under dynamic tensile loading. The experimental and numerical results showed that the hollow ring structure was reliable and effective in determining the dynamic and direct tensile mechanical properties of rock materials and expanded the upper limit of the strain rate. The direct tensile failure of the HRRSSs with a low strain rate was due to the connection of multiple weak surfaces, whereas that of the HRRSSs with a high strain rate occurred due to a central stress concentration area that consumed a large amount of plastic energy by penetrating a strong surface. The proposed testing method, specimen type, and analytical models can be used to investigate the mechanical properties of rocks using dynamic direct tensile tests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
606
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: EFM covers a broad range of topics in fracture mechanics to be of interest and use to both researchers and practitioners. Contributions are welcome which address the fracture behavior of conventional engineering material systems as well as newly emerging material systems. Contributions on developments in the areas of mechanics and materials science strongly related to fracture mechanics are also welcome. Papers on fatigue are welcome if they treat the fatigue process using the methods of fracture mechanics.
期刊最新文献
The splitting fatigue properties of ultra-large particle size asphalt mixture under the coupling effect of temperature and load A pre-tension based adhesion-tuning approach: Bridging the gap in peeling test research and application Impact tensile test and numerical analysis of the dynamic behavior of sandstone ring specimens using a split Hopkinson hollow tensile bar Multiscale analysis of carbon microfiber reinforcement on fracture behavior of ultra-high-performance concrete The role of burial depth on the structural plane-controlled rock burst failure characteristics of circular hard rock tunnels under true triaxial conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1