{"title":"Decoding urban form resilience and adaptation in flood prone wards of Surat, India: Exploring the duality of public-private discourse","authors":"Nitesh Shukla, Arup Das, Tarak Nath Mazumder","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cities in the Global South face amplified consequences of climate change due to rapid urbanization, which is predominantly informal and lacks basic infrastructure and emergency support systems. The worst affected sections are those living in informal settlements, generally located in the city's floodplains. The lack of or lag in the state's response to flood hazards creates a need for urban dwellers to adapt to these recurring disturbances. However, there is limited understanding of the implications of these localized interventions for overall urban resilience and how they interact with state-level adaptation efforts. This study explores two layers of resilience phenomena: urban form resilience and the adaptive response of different stakeholders within the urban form. Taking case study of Surat, a city situated on the western ghats of India, the study assesses urban form resilience and the patterns and costs of adaptation through a Rapid Visual Survey (RVS). The findings reveal that formal urban areas have higher resilience scores, while informal settlements exhibit lower resilience scores but more individual adaptation. Individual households alter their physical form by taking measures such as raising the plinth, raising the porch area, constructing a protection wall on the entrance, and constructing a mezzanine floor to cope with recurring flood hazards. However, the cost of these individual adaptations is significantly high for an adapting household as compared to the per household cost of state-led adaptation. The study provides a context-specific input to the ongoing discourse on collaboration between top-down and bottom-up efforts for a resilient and sustainable urban environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101178"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525000442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cities in the Global South face amplified consequences of climate change due to rapid urbanization, which is predominantly informal and lacks basic infrastructure and emergency support systems. The worst affected sections are those living in informal settlements, generally located in the city's floodplains. The lack of or lag in the state's response to flood hazards creates a need for urban dwellers to adapt to these recurring disturbances. However, there is limited understanding of the implications of these localized interventions for overall urban resilience and how they interact with state-level adaptation efforts. This study explores two layers of resilience phenomena: urban form resilience and the adaptive response of different stakeholders within the urban form. Taking case study of Surat, a city situated on the western ghats of India, the study assesses urban form resilience and the patterns and costs of adaptation through a Rapid Visual Survey (RVS). The findings reveal that formal urban areas have higher resilience scores, while informal settlements exhibit lower resilience scores but more individual adaptation. Individual households alter their physical form by taking measures such as raising the plinth, raising the porch area, constructing a protection wall on the entrance, and constructing a mezzanine floor to cope with recurring flood hazards. However, the cost of these individual adaptations is significantly high for an adapting household as compared to the per household cost of state-led adaptation. The study provides a context-specific input to the ongoing discourse on collaboration between top-down and bottom-up efforts for a resilient and sustainable urban environment.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action.
Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers.
All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.