All Good Things Come to an End: Emerging Strategic Patterns of Sunset Foundations

IF 1.4 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing Pub Date : 2025-02-23 DOI:10.1002/nvsm.70015
Alice Hengevoss, Georg von Schnurbein
{"title":"All Good Things Come to an End: Emerging Strategic Patterns of Sunset Foundations","authors":"Alice Hengevoss,&nbsp;Georg von Schnurbein","doi":"10.1002/nvsm.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Sunset foundations—foundations that exist for a limited time—are gaining increased attention in the discussion on impactful philanthropy. The idea is that having a limited organizational life span allows for greater impact. However, there is little knowledge on how leaders of these foundations navigate this sunset phase. Based on organizational development theory, we take a first step in investigating the causes that lead to the decision to sunset. We apply a multiple-case study approach to analyze an international sample of 11 sunset foundations. We find that depending on the cause for the decision to close as well as the logic through which the remaining endowment is spent down, four distinct ideal-typical sunset strategies emerge. The proposed strategic patterns refer to as Impact Accelerators, Urgency Responders, Resource Spenders, and Fade-outs. This classification adds to a better understanding of the strategic and managerial requirements leaders of sunset foundations should consider and the intended impact goals connected to a sunset.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nvsm.70015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sunset foundations—foundations that exist for a limited time—are gaining increased attention in the discussion on impactful philanthropy. The idea is that having a limited organizational life span allows for greater impact. However, there is little knowledge on how leaders of these foundations navigate this sunset phase. Based on organizational development theory, we take a first step in investigating the causes that lead to the decision to sunset. We apply a multiple-case study approach to analyze an international sample of 11 sunset foundations. We find that depending on the cause for the decision to close as well as the logic through which the remaining endowment is spent down, four distinct ideal-typical sunset strategies emerge. The proposed strategic patterns refer to as Impact Accelerators, Urgency Responders, Resource Spenders, and Fade-outs. This classification adds to a better understanding of the strategic and managerial requirements leaders of sunset foundations should consider and the intended impact goals connected to a sunset.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
天下没有不散的筵席:日落基金会的新战略模式
日落基金会——存在时间有限的基金会——在有影响力的慈善事业的讨论中越来越受到关注。其理念是,有限的组织寿命可以产生更大的影响。然而,对于这些基金会的领导人如何度过这个夕阳阶段,人们知之甚少。基于组织发展理论,我们在调查导致落日决定的原因上迈出了第一步。我们采用多案例研究方法分析了11个日落基金会的国际样本。我们发现,根据决定关闭的原因以及剩余禀赋消耗的逻辑,出现了四种不同的理想典型日落策略。建议的战略模式包括影响加速器、紧急响应器、资源消耗器和淡出。这种分类有助于更好地理解日落基金会的领导者应该考虑的战略和管理要求,以及与日落相关的预期影响目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Money Attitudes Driving Charitable Bequest Intentions: Understanding Legacy-Gift Segments to Inform Nonprofit Communication Strategy Re-Envisioning Global Health Partnerships in Times of Decreasing Foreign Aid From the U.S. and Other High-Income Countries: The Child Thrive Coalition Lessons Learned: Individual Charitable Giving and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1