An Assessment of the Impact of a Diverse Geological Substrate on Potentially Toxic Elements (PTEs) Content and Origin in Soil and Sediment in Flood Conditions Using Different Receptor Models
{"title":"An Assessment of the Impact of a Diverse Geological Substrate on Potentially Toxic Elements (PTEs) Content and Origin in Soil and Sediment in Flood Conditions Using Different Receptor Models","authors":"Dragan Čakmak, Veljko Perović, Dragana Pavlović, Svetlana Antić-Mladenović, Marija Matić, Miroslava Mitrović, Pavle Pavlović","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study is to determine the level and source of pollution by potentially toxic elements (PTEs) due to torrential floods in the catchment area of the Drina River under complex geological conditions. The degree of soil and sediment pollution by PTEs was estimated by calculating the Pollution Index (PI) and the Geo-accumulation index (Igeo). Sources of PTEs were determined using Principal component analysis (PCA) for soil and sediment and the Positive Matrix Factorisation (PMF) model for sediment. To fully include the spatial component when determining the source of PTEs, Bivariate Local Moran's I analysis was also applied. By comparing the applied methods, it was determined that PCA is suitable for determining the sources of PTEs in soil and for investigating the sedimentation process in sediment, while the PMF model is more suitable for determining the sources of PTEs in sediment. It was also determined that when the geological substrate is rich and after high-intensity flooding, there is an increase in As, Cd, Co, Cu and Fe content in sediment compared with soil. Arsenic was partially impacted by anthropogenic factors, with Igeo values for soil (16.21%) and sediment (21.76%) at the polluted level.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study is to determine the level and source of pollution by potentially toxic elements (PTEs) due to torrential floods in the catchment area of the Drina River under complex geological conditions. The degree of soil and sediment pollution by PTEs was estimated by calculating the Pollution Index (PI) and the Geo-accumulation index (Igeo). Sources of PTEs were determined using Principal component analysis (PCA) for soil and sediment and the Positive Matrix Factorisation (PMF) model for sediment. To fully include the spatial component when determining the source of PTEs, Bivariate Local Moran's I analysis was also applied. By comparing the applied methods, it was determined that PCA is suitable for determining the sources of PTEs in soil and for investigating the sedimentation process in sediment, while the PMF model is more suitable for determining the sources of PTEs in sediment. It was also determined that when the geological substrate is rich and after high-intensity flooding, there is an increase in As, Cd, Co, Cu and Fe content in sediment compared with soil. Arsenic was partially impacted by anthropogenic factors, with Igeo values for soil (16.21%) and sediment (21.76%) at the polluted level.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind.
Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.