Ashkan Jasemi, Eva Fejerskov Lauridsen, Liselotte Sonnesen
{"title":"Head Posture and Upper Spine Morphological Deviations in Patients With Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.","authors":"Ashkan Jasemi, Eva Fejerskov Lauridsen, Liselotte Sonnesen","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare head posture and upper spine morphology in hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) patients with healthy controls with neutral occlusion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study consisted of 27 hEDS patients (23 females, 4 males, mean age 36.41 ± 11.35) and 39 healthy controls (28 females, 11 males, mean age 31.85 ± 11.35) with neutral occlusion and no previous orthodontic treatment. Head posture was analysed by angular measurements on lateral cephalograms taken in natural head position and upper spine morphology was assessed on Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) by visual analysis of fusion and partial cleft of the upper spine and compared by general linear and logistic analyses adjusted for age and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, upper spine morphological deviations occurred significantly more often in hEDS patients (51.9%) compared to controls (15.4%) (p = 0.007). Out of the two categories of upper spine morphological deviations (fusion anomalies and posterior arch deficiencies (PAD)), PAD occurred significantly more often in hEDS patients (48.1%) compared to controls (12.8%) (p = 0.007). The differences remained significant when p-values were corrected for multiple testing comparing groups. Head posture was almost significantly more extended in hEDS patients compared to controls when the p-values were corrected for multiple testing comparing groups (NSL/VER, p = 0.089; NSL/OPT, p = 0.080).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the present study indicate that upper spine morphology is affected in hEDS patients. The results may contribute to a further understanding of the spinal phenotypic spectrum in hEDS patients and thus prove valuable in the diagnostics and treatment of hEDS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12907","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare head posture and upper spine morphology in hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) patients with healthy controls with neutral occlusion.
Materials and methods: The study consisted of 27 hEDS patients (23 females, 4 males, mean age 36.41 ± 11.35) and 39 healthy controls (28 females, 11 males, mean age 31.85 ± 11.35) with neutral occlusion and no previous orthodontic treatment. Head posture was analysed by angular measurements on lateral cephalograms taken in natural head position and upper spine morphology was assessed on Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) by visual analysis of fusion and partial cleft of the upper spine and compared by general linear and logistic analyses adjusted for age and gender.
Results: In total, upper spine morphological deviations occurred significantly more often in hEDS patients (51.9%) compared to controls (15.4%) (p = 0.007). Out of the two categories of upper spine morphological deviations (fusion anomalies and posterior arch deficiencies (PAD)), PAD occurred significantly more often in hEDS patients (48.1%) compared to controls (12.8%) (p = 0.007). The differences remained significant when p-values were corrected for multiple testing comparing groups. Head posture was almost significantly more extended in hEDS patients compared to controls when the p-values were corrected for multiple testing comparing groups (NSL/VER, p = 0.089; NSL/OPT, p = 0.080).
Conclusions: The results of the present study indicate that upper spine morphology is affected in hEDS patients. The results may contribute to a further understanding of the spinal phenotypic spectrum in hEDS patients and thus prove valuable in the diagnostics and treatment of hEDS patients.
期刊介绍:
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions.
The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements.
The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.