Improving dynamic endurance time predictions for shoulder fatigue: A comparative evaluation

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104480
Patricia O'Sullivan , Matteo Menolotto , Brendan O'Flynn , Dimitrios-Sokratis Komaris
{"title":"Improving dynamic endurance time predictions for shoulder fatigue: A comparative evaluation","authors":"Patricia O'Sullivan ,&nbsp;Matteo Menolotto ,&nbsp;Brendan O'Flynn ,&nbsp;Dimitrios-Sokratis Komaris","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are commonplace in industry and a host of qualitative and quantitative approaches have been used to assuage the problem, including wearable sensors and biomechanical endurance models, both of which were used in the present study. Six endurance models (consumed endurance, new improved consumed endurance and the exponential and power Frey Law and Avin general and shoulder models) with four alternative maximum torque (<span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>q</mi><mi>u</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow><mi>max</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>) quantification methods, including a novel approach to generate <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>q</mi><mi>u</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow><mi>max</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>, were compared. The proposed approach to quantify <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>q</mi><mi>u</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow><mi>max</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>, in combination with the new improved consumed endurance model produced the lowest root mean square errors (RMSE), and indicated improved performance compared to the literature. The mean RMSE was reduced from 41.08s to 19.11s for all subjects, from 26.13s to 12.16s for males, and 51.28s to 24.45s for females using the proposed method. R<sup>2</sup> for 25% and 45% standardised intensity dynamic tasks were .459 and .314 respectively, P &lt; .01. This research provided an optimised and individualised endurance prediction approach for loaded dynamic movements which can be applied to industry tasks and may lead to reduced upper-limb strains, and potentially WMSDs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104480"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000368702500016X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are commonplace in industry and a host of qualitative and quantitative approaches have been used to assuage the problem, including wearable sensors and biomechanical endurance models, both of which were used in the present study. Six endurance models (consumed endurance, new improved consumed endurance and the exponential and power Frey Law and Avin general and shoulder models) with four alternative maximum torque (Torquemax) quantification methods, including a novel approach to generate Torquemax, were compared. The proposed approach to quantify Torquemax, in combination with the new improved consumed endurance model produced the lowest root mean square errors (RMSE), and indicated improved performance compared to the literature. The mean RMSE was reduced from 41.08s to 19.11s for all subjects, from 26.13s to 12.16s for males, and 51.28s to 24.45s for females using the proposed method. R2 for 25% and 45% standardised intensity dynamic tasks were .459 and .314 respectively, P < .01. This research provided an optimised and individualised endurance prediction approach for loaded dynamic movements which can be applied to industry tasks and may lead to reduced upper-limb strains, and potentially WMSDs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进肩部疲劳的动态耐力时间预测:一个比较评价
与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSDs)在工业中很常见,许多定性和定量的方法已经被用来缓解这个问题,包括可穿戴传感器和生物力学耐力模型,这两种方法都被用于本研究。比较了6种耐力模型(消耗耐力、新型改进的消耗耐力、指数和功率Frey定律和Avin一般模型和肩部模型)和4种可选的最大扭矩(Torquemax)量化方法,包括一种新的产生Torquemax的方法。所提出的量化Torquemax的方法与新的改进的消耗耐力模型相结合,产生了最低的均方根误差(RMSE),与文献相比,表明性能有所提高。使用所提出的方法,所有受试者的平均RMSE从41.08s降至19.11s,男性从26.13s降至12.16s,女性从51.28s降至24.45s。25%和45%标准化强度动态任务的R2分别为0.459和0.314,P <;. 01。该研究为负载动态运动提供了一种优化的个性化耐力预测方法,可应用于工业任务,并可能减少上肢劳损,以及潜在的WMSDs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the effects of back-support exoskeletons on work posture: An automated AI-based NIOSH measurement using YOLO. Design and context of use of postpartum haemorrhage kits in the UK: a qualitative study combining human factors and social science analysis. Personalised cutout saddle selection reduces perineal pain and improves cycling comfort in women with vulvar skin conditions. Generating a representative anthropometric dataset for U.S. children and youth. Perceptions of activity-based flexible offices among onsite, hybrid and remote workers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1