Improving dynamic endurance time predictions for shoulder fatigue: A comparative evaluation

IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104480
Patricia O'Sullivan , Matteo Menolotto , Brendan O'Flynn , Dimitrios-Sokratis Komaris
{"title":"Improving dynamic endurance time predictions for shoulder fatigue: A comparative evaluation","authors":"Patricia O'Sullivan ,&nbsp;Matteo Menolotto ,&nbsp;Brendan O'Flynn ,&nbsp;Dimitrios-Sokratis Komaris","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are commonplace in industry and a host of qualitative and quantitative approaches have been used to assuage the problem, including wearable sensors and biomechanical endurance models, both of which were used in the present study. Six endurance models (consumed endurance, new improved consumed endurance and the exponential and power Frey Law and Avin general and shoulder models) with four alternative maximum torque (<span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>q</mi><mi>u</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow><mi>max</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>) quantification methods, including a novel approach to generate <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>q</mi><mi>u</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow><mi>max</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>, were compared. The proposed approach to quantify <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>q</mi><mi>u</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow><mi>max</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>, in combination with the new improved consumed endurance model produced the lowest root mean square errors (RMSE), and indicated improved performance compared to the literature. The mean RMSE was reduced from 41.08s to 19.11s for all subjects, from 26.13s to 12.16s for males, and 51.28s to 24.45s for females using the proposed method. R<sup>2</sup> for 25% and 45% standardised intensity dynamic tasks were .459 and .314 respectively, P &lt; .01. This research provided an optimised and individualised endurance prediction approach for loaded dynamic movements which can be applied to industry tasks and may lead to reduced upper-limb strains, and potentially WMSDs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104480"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000368702500016X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are commonplace in industry and a host of qualitative and quantitative approaches have been used to assuage the problem, including wearable sensors and biomechanical endurance models, both of which were used in the present study. Six endurance models (consumed endurance, new improved consumed endurance and the exponential and power Frey Law and Avin general and shoulder models) with four alternative maximum torque (Torquemax) quantification methods, including a novel approach to generate Torquemax, were compared. The proposed approach to quantify Torquemax, in combination with the new improved consumed endurance model produced the lowest root mean square errors (RMSE), and indicated improved performance compared to the literature. The mean RMSE was reduced from 41.08s to 19.11s for all subjects, from 26.13s to 12.16s for males, and 51.28s to 24.45s for females using the proposed method. R2 for 25% and 45% standardised intensity dynamic tasks were .459 and .314 respectively, P < .01. This research provided an optimised and individualised endurance prediction approach for loaded dynamic movements which can be applied to industry tasks and may lead to reduced upper-limb strains, and potentially WMSDs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of a comprehensive health promotion intervention for managing risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders in Iranian housewives: A four-arm randomized controlled trial Effects of DC-powered pistol grip tool location and orientation on operator upper extremity stiffness and damping Development, validation, acceptability and usability of a device-based system to measure sit-stand desk usage Editorial Board Dynamics of COVID-19 crisis management in hospitals and its long-term effects: An analysis using organizational resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1