A novel framework for prioritization and spatial suitability assessment of Blue-Green infrastructure for urban pluvial flood resilience

IF 6.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132976
P. Ambily , N.R. Chithra , Mohammed Firoz C
{"title":"A novel framework for prioritization and spatial suitability assessment of Blue-Green infrastructure for urban pluvial flood resilience","authors":"P. Ambily ,&nbsp;N.R. Chithra ,&nbsp;Mohammed Firoz C","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) is amongst the most promising solutions to urban pluvial flooding. Optimum siting of BGI for maximum efficiency based on demand–supply assessment is a challenging problem investigated by earlier researchers. However, risk-based demand assessments focus on system vulnerabilities and often overlook the inherent system capacity to absorb and adapt to floods. A more effective approach would involve a resilience-based need assessment to optimize the use of available resources for maximum efficiency. In this research, a resilience-based framework is developed for BGI spatial planning in four modules to prioritize areas requiring intervention, assess spatial suitability, validate and optimize the proposed BGI. In Kochi City of Southern India, indicators of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, Normalized Difference Water Index, Topographic Wetness Index, Soil Potential Retention, and Patch Cohesion Index are weighted and applied for prioritization using weighted overlay analysis. Spatial suitability is assessed using land-use classification, plot size, and accessibility. A decentralized detention storage facility is proposed as the optimum BGI for the city which is simulated for a 24-hour event with a 25-year return period using Personnel Computer Storm Water Management Model (PCSWMM). ‘Duration Factor’ is examined to understand the effect of flood duration and depth on the city’s functionality. The sizes of BGI facility are optimized using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. The results of the flood modelling indicate a significant reduction in average flood duration by around 24% and flood depth by around 28% with the detention storage system, which is further improved by the optimization of detention storages sizes. Key contributions of this study are a methodological framework for site prioritization, suitability mapping, and a typological classification for small to medium-scale urban flood storage facilities. The proposed framework has important implications in identifying, prioritizing, optimizing and placing BGI for improved urban flood resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"655 ","pages":"Article 132976"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425003142","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) is amongst the most promising solutions to urban pluvial flooding. Optimum siting of BGI for maximum efficiency based on demand–supply assessment is a challenging problem investigated by earlier researchers. However, risk-based demand assessments focus on system vulnerabilities and often overlook the inherent system capacity to absorb and adapt to floods. A more effective approach would involve a resilience-based need assessment to optimize the use of available resources for maximum efficiency. In this research, a resilience-based framework is developed for BGI spatial planning in four modules to prioritize areas requiring intervention, assess spatial suitability, validate and optimize the proposed BGI. In Kochi City of Southern India, indicators of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, Normalized Difference Water Index, Topographic Wetness Index, Soil Potential Retention, and Patch Cohesion Index are weighted and applied for prioritization using weighted overlay analysis. Spatial suitability is assessed using land-use classification, plot size, and accessibility. A decentralized detention storage facility is proposed as the optimum BGI for the city which is simulated for a 24-hour event with a 25-year return period using Personnel Computer Storm Water Management Model (PCSWMM). ‘Duration Factor’ is examined to understand the effect of flood duration and depth on the city’s functionality. The sizes of BGI facility are optimized using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. The results of the flood modelling indicate a significant reduction in average flood duration by around 24% and flood depth by around 28% with the detention storage system, which is further improved by the optimization of detention storages sizes. Key contributions of this study are a methodological framework for site prioritization, suitability mapping, and a typological classification for small to medium-scale urban flood storage facilities. The proposed framework has important implications in identifying, prioritizing, optimizing and placing BGI for improved urban flood resilience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市洪泛恢复能力蓝绿基础设施优先排序与空间适宜性评价的新框架
蓝绿基础设施(BGI)是解决城市洪水最有希望的解决方案之一。基于供需评估的华大基因优化选址是早期研究人员研究的一个具有挑战性的问题。然而,基于风险的需求评估侧重于系统脆弱性,往往忽视了系统吸收和适应洪水的固有能力。更有效的办法是进行基于复原力的需求评估,以优化现有资源的利用,实现最高效率。在本研究中,为华大基因空间规划开发了一个基于弹性的框架,分为四个模块,以优先考虑需要干预的区域,评估空间适宜性,验证和优化拟议的华大基因。以印度南部的科钦市为例,对归一化植被指数、归一化水分指数、地形湿度指数、土壤潜在保持力指数和斑块粘聚力指数进行加权,并采用加权叠加分析方法进行优先级排序。利用土地利用分类、地块大小和可达性来评估空间适宜性。采用人员计算机雨水管理模型(PCSWMM)模拟了一个24小时的事件和25年的回复期,提出了一个分散的蓄能设施作为城市的最佳BGI。考察“持续时间因素”,以了解洪水持续时间和深度对城市功能的影响。采用非支配排序遗传算法对华大基因设施的规模进行优化。洪水模拟结果表明,采用滞洪蓄水池后,平均洪水持续时间减少约24%,洪水深度减少约28%,并通过优化滞洪蓄水池规模进一步改善了这一效果。本研究的主要贡献是为中小规模城市蓄洪设施的选址优先级、适宜性映射和类型分类提供了方法学框架。该框架对于识别、优先排序、优化和安置华大基因以提高城市抗洪能力具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
期刊最新文献
A new approach for groundwater fluxes assessment in alluvial aquifers using active-DTS with a Brillouin-based sensor Daily river water levels from multi-mission altimetry: A reach-based regression method using the unique SWOT data geometry Detection of nine plateau lakes water level changes in Yunnan, China from ICESat-2 data Agent-based intelligent real-time control for pluvial flood mitigation at urban scale A multidimensional Tucker tensor fusion method for multi-satellite derived chlorophyll-a concentrations in an Early Eutrophic Plateau lake
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1