Research on Plastic Mitigation Underestimates the Potential Land-Use Impact of Bio-Based Plastic Alternatives

IF 4.1 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY Global Change Biology Bioenergy Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1111/gcbb.70024
Levi T. Helm
{"title":"Research on Plastic Mitigation Underestimates the Potential Land-Use Impact of Bio-Based Plastic Alternatives","authors":"Levi T. Helm","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The impacts of plastic, including carbon emissions and plastic pollution, have significant negative impacts on human well-being and the environment. Recent research suggests that these impacts could be mitigated by using biomass to create products with lower carbon emissions or that reduce pollution through biodegradation or composting. As the scale of the plastic problem is substantial, the amount of biomass required for mitigation could be large. Biomass may have benefits, but it also has risks, including the potential to cause significant land-use change. Land-use impacts are widely acknowledged in the literature on plastic mitigation but are often downplayed with assumptions that changes in policies, behaviors, agricultural productivity, and technology can ameliorate the most negative impacts. This paper reviews the assumptions made about land use in the literature on biomass-based plastics and plastic alternatives. Current studies generally make optimistic assumptions about land-use change or have limited ability to account for land-use change impacts. These assumptions, including technological and agricultural advancement, along with idealized feedstock sourcing, minimize potential land-use impacts. This paper demonstrates how reasonable projections based on the literature could require a considerable amount of biomass, equivalent to a 7%–13% increase in global crop demand in 2040. Further research investigating projections for biomass use and the assumptions in these estimates is required to better understand potential land-use impacts from bio-based plastic substitutes. This research is important for informing emerging policies, including the UN Treaty on plastic pollution. Establishing criteria and thresholds for the sustainability of bio-based alternatives, as well as identifying potential negative outcomes, will be crucial to avoid setting out on a path with significant unintended and potentially unavoidable consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70024","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impacts of plastic, including carbon emissions and plastic pollution, have significant negative impacts on human well-being and the environment. Recent research suggests that these impacts could be mitigated by using biomass to create products with lower carbon emissions or that reduce pollution through biodegradation or composting. As the scale of the plastic problem is substantial, the amount of biomass required for mitigation could be large. Biomass may have benefits, but it also has risks, including the potential to cause significant land-use change. Land-use impacts are widely acknowledged in the literature on plastic mitigation but are often downplayed with assumptions that changes in policies, behaviors, agricultural productivity, and technology can ameliorate the most negative impacts. This paper reviews the assumptions made about land use in the literature on biomass-based plastics and plastic alternatives. Current studies generally make optimistic assumptions about land-use change or have limited ability to account for land-use change impacts. These assumptions, including technological and agricultural advancement, along with idealized feedstock sourcing, minimize potential land-use impacts. This paper demonstrates how reasonable projections based on the literature could require a considerable amount of biomass, equivalent to a 7%–13% increase in global crop demand in 2040. Further research investigating projections for biomass use and the assumptions in these estimates is required to better understand potential land-use impacts from bio-based plastic substitutes. This research is important for informing emerging policies, including the UN Treaty on plastic pollution. Establishing criteria and thresholds for the sustainability of bio-based alternatives, as well as identifying potential negative outcomes, will be crucial to avoid setting out on a path with significant unintended and potentially unavoidable consequences.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塑料减排研究低估了生物基塑料替代品对土地利用的潜在影响
塑料的影响,包括碳排放和塑料污染,对人类福祉和环境产生了重大的负面影响。最近的研究表明,这些影响可以通过利用生物质生产碳排放较低的产品或通过生物降解或堆肥减少污染来减轻。由于塑料问题的规模很大,缓解所需的生物质数量可能很大。生物质可能有好处,但也有风险,包括可能造成重大的土地利用变化。在有关塑料缓解的文献中,土地利用影响得到了广泛承认,但往往被低估,因为人们假设政策、行为、农业生产力和技术的变化可以减轻最负面的影响。本文回顾了生物基塑料和塑料替代品文献中关于土地利用的假设。目前的研究一般对土地利用变化作出乐观的假设,或者解释土地利用变化影响的能力有限。这些假设,包括技术和农业进步,以及理想化的原料采购,最大限度地减少了潜在的土地利用影响。本文展示了基于文献的合理预测如何需要相当数量的生物质,相当于2040年全球作物需求增加7%-13%。为了更好地了解生物基塑料替代品对土地利用的潜在影响,需要对生物量利用的预测和这些估计中的假设进行进一步的研究。这项研究对于为包括联合国塑料污染条约在内的新兴政策提供信息非常重要。为生物基替代品的可持续性制定标准和阈值,以及确定潜在的负面结果,对于避免走上一条具有重大意外和可能不可避免的后果的道路至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
期刊最新文献
Interactive Effects of Warming and Nitrogen Fertilization on Soil Organic Carbon, Total Nitrogen, Soil Respiration, and Microbial Activities Co-Application of Biochar and Organic Matter With Synthetic Fertilisers Improves Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Rice Yield and Benefit–Cost Ratio: A Meta-Analysis Issue Information Biochar-Based Fertilizer Is Cost-Effective, Reduces Nutrient Input and Improves Nutrient Use Efficiency Without Decreasing Yield Biochar-Based Fertilizer Is Cost-Effective, Reduces Nutrient Input and Improves Nutrient Use Efficiency Without Decreasing Yield
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1