Association between early phosphate intake and refeeding syndrome in extremely low-birth-weight infants: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-02-23 DOI:10.1002/jpen.2739
Thomas B Wright, Frank H Bloomfield, Tanith Alexander, Barbara E Cormack
{"title":"Association between early phosphate intake and refeeding syndrome in extremely low-birth-weight infants: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Thomas B Wright, Frank H Bloomfield, Tanith Alexander, Barbara E Cormack","doi":"10.1002/jpen.2739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preterm infants are at risk of refeeding syndrome, a constellation of biochemical changes associated with nutrition. We aimed to determine whether increased early phosphate intake with routine biochemical monitoring is associated with a reduction in refeeding syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study in two Auckland neonatal intensive care units comparing infants born <1000 g before (2014-2018, standard phosphate intake) and after (2020-2021, early phosphate intake) changes to intravenous nutrition protocols that increased phosphate intake and introduced biochemical monitoring. The standard phosphate intake cohort comprised the participants who received placebo in a randomized controlled trial of early increased amino acid intake. The early phosphate intake cohort was identified prospectively. Data were retrieved from the trial database or prospectively from electronic medical records. Groups were compared using either the chi-square test or pooled t test and logistic or multiple logistic regression analysis. Refeeding syndrome was defined as concurrent hypophosphatemia (serum phosphate <1.4 mmol L<sup>-1</sup>) and hypercalcemia (serum calcium >2.8 mmol L<sup>-1</sup>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of refeeding syndrome in the first 5 days after birth decreased from 11.9% to 2.9%, hypophosphatemia from 53.5% to 21.2%, and severe hypophosphatemia (<0.9 mmol L<sup>-1</sup>) from 11.3% to 1.2%. Probable early- and late-onset sepsis reduced from 51.4% to 28.2% and from 62.5% to 28.0%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased early phosphate intake with routine biochemical monitoring is associated with a lower incidence of refeeding syndrome, hypophosphatemia, and associated comorbidities. Whether these associations are causal requires further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2739","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preterm infants are at risk of refeeding syndrome, a constellation of biochemical changes associated with nutrition. We aimed to determine whether increased early phosphate intake with routine biochemical monitoring is associated with a reduction in refeeding syndrome.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study in two Auckland neonatal intensive care units comparing infants born <1000 g before (2014-2018, standard phosphate intake) and after (2020-2021, early phosphate intake) changes to intravenous nutrition protocols that increased phosphate intake and introduced biochemical monitoring. The standard phosphate intake cohort comprised the participants who received placebo in a randomized controlled trial of early increased amino acid intake. The early phosphate intake cohort was identified prospectively. Data were retrieved from the trial database or prospectively from electronic medical records. Groups were compared using either the chi-square test or pooled t test and logistic or multiple logistic regression analysis. Refeeding syndrome was defined as concurrent hypophosphatemia (serum phosphate <1.4 mmol L-1) and hypercalcemia (serum calcium >2.8 mmol L-1).

Results: The incidence of refeeding syndrome in the first 5 days after birth decreased from 11.9% to 2.9%, hypophosphatemia from 53.5% to 21.2%, and severe hypophosphatemia (<0.9 mmol L-1) from 11.3% to 1.2%. Probable early- and late-onset sepsis reduced from 51.4% to 28.2% and from 62.5% to 28.0%, respectively.

Conclusions: Increased early phosphate intake with routine biochemical monitoring is associated with a lower incidence of refeeding syndrome, hypophosphatemia, and associated comorbidities. Whether these associations are causal requires further investigation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (JPEN) is the premier scientific journal of nutrition and metabolic support. It publishes original peer-reviewed studies that define the cutting edge of basic and clinical research in the field. It explores the science of optimizing the care of patients receiving enteral or IV therapies. Also included: reviews, techniques, brief reports, case reports, and abstracts.
期刊最新文献
Multiomics profiling and parenteral nutrition weaning in pediatric patients with intestinal failure: A longitudinal cohort study. Association between early phosphate intake and refeeding syndrome in extremely low-birth-weight infants: A retrospective cohort study. Impact of early enteral nutrition in critically ill children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JPEN Journal Club 91. Choosing the population to study. Metabolic profiles and malnutrition in hospitalized adults: A metabolomic cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1