From data to artificial intelligence: evaluating the readiness of gastrointestinal endoscopy datasets.

IF 2.7 Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-02-21 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1093/jcag/gwae041
Sami Elamin, Shreya Johri, Pranav Rajpurkar, Enrik Geisler, Tyler M Berzin
{"title":"From data to artificial intelligence: evaluating the readiness of gastrointestinal endoscopy datasets.","authors":"Sami Elamin, Shreya Johri, Pranav Rajpurkar, Enrik Geisler, Tyler M Berzin","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwae041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy represents a promising advancement in gastroenterology. With over 40 published randomized controlled trials and numerous ongoing clinical trials, gastroenterology leads other medical disciplines in AI research. Computer-aided detection algorithms for identifying colorectal polyps have achieved regulatory approval and are in routine clinical use, while other AI applications for GI endoscopy are in advanced development stages. Near-term opportunities include the potential for computer-aided diagnosis to replace conventional histopathology for diagnosing small colon polyps and increased AI automation in capsule endoscopy. Despite significant development in research settings, the generalizability and robustness of AI models in real clinical practice remain inconsistent. The GI field lags behind other medical disciplines in the breadth of novel AI algorithms, with only 13 out of 882 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved AI models focussed on GI endoscopy as of June 2024. Additionally, existing GI endoscopy image databases are disproportionately focussed on colon polyps, lacking representation of the diversity of other endoscopic findings. High-quality datasets, encompassing a wide range of patient demographics, endoscopic equipment types, and disease states, are crucial for developing effective AI models for GI endoscopy. This article reviews the current state of GI endoscopy datasets, barriers to progress, including dataset size, data diversity, annotation quality, and ethical issues in data collection and usage, and future needs for advancing AI in GI endoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"8 Suppl 2","pages":"S81-S86"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwae041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy represents a promising advancement in gastroenterology. With over 40 published randomized controlled trials and numerous ongoing clinical trials, gastroenterology leads other medical disciplines in AI research. Computer-aided detection algorithms for identifying colorectal polyps have achieved regulatory approval and are in routine clinical use, while other AI applications for GI endoscopy are in advanced development stages. Near-term opportunities include the potential for computer-aided diagnosis to replace conventional histopathology for diagnosing small colon polyps and increased AI automation in capsule endoscopy. Despite significant development in research settings, the generalizability and robustness of AI models in real clinical practice remain inconsistent. The GI field lags behind other medical disciplines in the breadth of novel AI algorithms, with only 13 out of 882 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved AI models focussed on GI endoscopy as of June 2024. Additionally, existing GI endoscopy image databases are disproportionately focussed on colon polyps, lacking representation of the diversity of other endoscopic findings. High-quality datasets, encompassing a wide range of patient demographics, endoscopic equipment types, and disease states, are crucial for developing effective AI models for GI endoscopy. This article reviews the current state of GI endoscopy datasets, barriers to progress, including dataset size, data diversity, annotation quality, and ethical issues in data collection and usage, and future needs for advancing AI in GI endoscopy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从数据到人工智能:评估胃肠内窥镜数据集的准备情况。
人工智能(AI)与胃肠道(GI)内窥镜的结合代表了胃肠病学的一个有前途的进步。胃肠病学在人工智能研究方面领先于其他医学学科,有40多项已发表的随机对照试验和众多正在进行的临床试验。用于识别结肠直肠息肉的计算机辅助检测算法已获得监管部门批准并进入常规临床应用,而其他用于胃肠道内镜的人工智能应用处于后期开发阶段。近期的机会包括计算机辅助诊断取代传统组织病理学诊断小结肠息肉的潜力,以及胶囊内窥镜中人工智能自动化程度的提高。尽管在研究方面取得了重大进展,但人工智能模型在实际临床实践中的通用性和稳健性仍然不一致。胃肠道领域在新型人工智能算法的广度方面落后于其他医学学科,截至2024年6月,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的882个人工智能模型中,只有13个专注于胃肠道内窥镜检查。此外,现有的胃肠道内镜图像数据库不成比例地集中于结肠息肉,缺乏其他内镜发现的多样性。高质量的数据集,包括广泛的患者人口统计、内窥镜设备类型和疾病状态,对于开发有效的胃肠道内窥镜人工智能模型至关重要。本文综述了GI内窥镜数据集的现状、进展障碍,包括数据集大小、数据多样性、注释质量、数据收集和使用中的伦理问题,以及未来在GI内窥镜中推进人工智能的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences study: Canadian individuals and healthcare professional perceptions of the experience and impact of symptoms of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Medico-legal cases involving gastroenterologists in Canada between 2017 and 2021. Effect of music therapy on patient experience in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a scoping review. Telemedicine and reduction of travel-related environmental impact of digestive clinic care in a Canadian province. Effectiveness of vedolizumab dose escalation in inflammatory bowel disease in a large-scale, Canadian real-world cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1