Łukasz Dembiński, Lorenzo Norsa, Sian Copley, Marcin Dziekiewicz, Thomas Gestels, Maureen Lawson, Cecilia Mantegazza, Gøri Perminow, Jonas Povilavicius, Monica Ronconi, Anna-Maria Schneider, Tobias Schwerd, Wojciech Sitarski, Kristina Skram, Geistė Tubutytė, Saskia Vande Velde, Dotan Yogev, Shira Yuval, Aleksandra Banaszkiewicz
{"title":"Validation of the Toronto Upper Gastrointestinal Cleaning Score in children.","authors":"Łukasz Dembiński, Lorenzo Norsa, Sian Copley, Marcin Dziekiewicz, Thomas Gestels, Maureen Lawson, Cecilia Mantegazza, Gøri Perminow, Jonas Povilavicius, Monica Ronconi, Anna-Maria Schneider, Tobias Schwerd, Wojciech Sitarski, Kristina Skram, Geistė Tubutytė, Saskia Vande Velde, Dotan Yogev, Shira Yuval, Aleksandra Banaszkiewicz","doi":"10.1002/jpn3.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Gastroscopy is used to examine the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, but no validated method yet exists to assess the quality of mucosal visualization in children. Utilizing validated endoscopic scales can enhance study quality and standardization across centers. This study aimed to validate the existing Toronto Upper Gastrointestinal Cleaning Score (TUGCS) in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter, prospective, single-masked study conducted in 10 European pediatric gastroenterology centers. Endoscopists with varying degrees of experience assessed the quality of mucosal visualization in prerecorded gastroscopies using the TUGCS. Each endoscopist assessed the studies two times in random order, with an interval of at least 2 weeks. The correlations of individual and total scores were statistically compared between themselves, between assessors, and between assessment attempts. Internal consistency was also checked with Cronbach's α.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen endoscopists participated in the study. The TUGCS demonstrated high consistency within raters, with a score of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-0.84), and an excellent test-retest reliability of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99). The scale also showed high internal consistency, with a Cronbach's α of 0.95. The correlation between different items ranged from 0.60 to 0.77, and the correlation between individual items and the total score ranged from 0.66 to 0.88. No significant differences in the assessment were found based on the raters' experience performing endoscopy, specialization, age, or gender. The endoscopists found TUGCS easy to learn and potentially useful, especially in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TUGCS was demonstrated as a reliable and validated method for assessing the visualization quality of the upper GI mucosa in pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.70022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Gastroscopy is used to examine the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, but no validated method yet exists to assess the quality of mucosal visualization in children. Utilizing validated endoscopic scales can enhance study quality and standardization across centers. This study aimed to validate the existing Toronto Upper Gastrointestinal Cleaning Score (TUGCS) in pediatric patients.
Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, single-masked study conducted in 10 European pediatric gastroenterology centers. Endoscopists with varying degrees of experience assessed the quality of mucosal visualization in prerecorded gastroscopies using the TUGCS. Each endoscopist assessed the studies two times in random order, with an interval of at least 2 weeks. The correlations of individual and total scores were statistically compared between themselves, between assessors, and between assessment attempts. Internal consistency was also checked with Cronbach's α.
Results: Seventeen endoscopists participated in the study. The TUGCS demonstrated high consistency within raters, with a score of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-0.84), and an excellent test-retest reliability of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99). The scale also showed high internal consistency, with a Cronbach's α of 0.95. The correlation between different items ranged from 0.60 to 0.77, and the correlation between individual items and the total score ranged from 0.66 to 0.88. No significant differences in the assessment were found based on the raters' experience performing endoscopy, specialization, age, or gender. The endoscopists found TUGCS easy to learn and potentially useful, especially in clinical trials.
Conclusions: The TUGCS was demonstrated as a reliable and validated method for assessing the visualization quality of the upper GI mucosa in pediatric patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (JPGN) provides a forum for original papers and reviews dealing with pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, including normal and abnormal functions of the alimentary tract and its associated organs, including the salivary glands, pancreas, gallbladder, and liver. Particular emphasis is on development and its relation to infant and childhood nutrition.