Morality in the Making: The Collaborative Relationship Between Formal Caregivers, Informal Caregivers, and Nursing Home Residents.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2025-05-10 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnaf082
Marleen D W Dohmen, Mandy Visser, Johanna M Huijg, Barbara C Groot, Tineke A Abma
{"title":"Morality in the Making: The Collaborative Relationship Between Formal Caregivers, Informal Caregivers, and Nursing Home Residents.","authors":"Marleen D W Dohmen, Mandy Visser, Johanna M Huijg, Barbara C Groot, Tineke A Abma","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Collaboration between formal and informal caregivers is essential for providing good care to nursing home residents. Yet, ambiguity regarding mutual roles and responsibilities often impedes effective collaboration. To address this issue, we examined how formal caregivers, informal caregivers, and residents establish a moral understanding of their responsibilities, and how these understandings affect their triadic relationship.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted a responsive evaluation including 28 semistructured interviews with formal caregivers, informal caregivers, and residents. We used the Walker's (2007) expressive-collaborative model of morality as a theoretical lens to identify identities, values, and roles in the triad.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Formal caregivers were assigned more moral responsibilities in the care process than residents and informal caregivers, particularly regarding decision-making authority. Formal caregivers considered this justified, while informal caregivers generally desired more influence. The attitude of residents on this matter remained relatively unclear. The diverging views on moral responsibilities between formal and informal caregivers led to relational tensions, affecting mutual trust and recognition between them.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Walker's model of morality provides a deeper understanding of the moral dynamics underlying the collaboration between formal caregivers, informal caregivers, and residents. Traditional hierarchies and a mismatch between healthcare and family ethics are implied to hinder informal caregiver involvement. Our findings call for practical and cultural adaptations on different levels within and outside nursing home organizations to improve the triadic collaborative relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Collaboration between formal and informal caregivers is essential for providing good care to nursing home residents. Yet, ambiguity regarding mutual roles and responsibilities often impedes effective collaboration. To address this issue, we examined how formal caregivers, informal caregivers, and residents establish a moral understanding of their responsibilities, and how these understandings affect their triadic relationship.

Research design and methods: We conducted a responsive evaluation including 28 semistructured interviews with formal caregivers, informal caregivers, and residents. We used the Walker's (2007) expressive-collaborative model of morality as a theoretical lens to identify identities, values, and roles in the triad.

Results: Formal caregivers were assigned more moral responsibilities in the care process than residents and informal caregivers, particularly regarding decision-making authority. Formal caregivers considered this justified, while informal caregivers generally desired more influence. The attitude of residents on this matter remained relatively unclear. The diverging views on moral responsibilities between formal and informal caregivers led to relational tensions, affecting mutual trust and recognition between them.

Discussion and implications: Walker's model of morality provides a deeper understanding of the moral dynamics underlying the collaboration between formal caregivers, informal caregivers, and residents. Traditional hierarchies and a mismatch between healthcare and family ethics are implied to hinder informal caregiver involvement. Our findings call for practical and cultural adaptations on different levels within and outside nursing home organizations to improve the triadic collaborative relationship.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
形成中的道德:正式照顾者、非正式照顾者与养老院居民之间的合作关系。
背景和目的:正式和非正式护理人员之间的合作对于为养老院居民提供良好的护理至关重要。然而,相互角色和责任的模糊性常常阻碍有效的合作。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了正式照顾者、非正式照顾者和居民如何建立对他们责任的道德理解,以及这些理解如何影响他们的三合一关系。研究设计和方法:我们进行了响应性评估,包括28个半结构化访谈,包括正式护理人员、非正式护理人员和居民。沃克的表达-合作道德模型(2007)被用作识别身份、价值观和角色的理论视角。结果:在护理过程中,正式护理人员被赋予的道德责任比住院医师和非正式护理人员更多,尤其是在决策权方面。正式的照顾者认为这是合理的,而非正式的照顾者通常希望更多的影响。居民对这件事的态度还比较不明朗。正式和非正式照顾者对道德责任的不同看法导致关系紧张,影响了他们之间的相互信任和认可。讨论和启示:Walker的道德模型提供了对正式照顾者、非正式照顾者和居民之间合作的道德动态的更深层次的理解。传统的等级制度和医疗保健与家庭伦理之间的不匹配被暗示会阻碍非正式照顾者的参与。我们的研究结果呼吁在养老院组织内外的不同层面上进行实践和文化适应,以改善三方合作关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
Book review: Living Beyond Loss by Robert Neimeyer. Exploring the Cognitive Aspects of Walking in the Neighbourhoods among People Living with Dementia. Exploring Older Adults' Engagement with Socially-Assistive-Robots using AI: Personas, Patterns, and Psychosocial Outcomes. Navigating Late-Life Parental Care Transitions: Implications for Adult Children's Psychosocial Well-Being. Sentimental Value and the value of sentiment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1