Glenohumeral arthrodesis in brachial plexus palsies: open surgery or arthroscopy? A retrospective comparative study

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.029
Marie Fernandez MD , Antoine Bossée-Pilon MD , Thomas Williams MD , Frédéric Dubrana PhD , Arthur Dellestable MD
{"title":"Glenohumeral arthrodesis in brachial plexus palsies: open surgery or arthroscopy? A retrospective comparative study","authors":"Marie Fernandez MD ,&nbsp;Antoine Bossée-Pilon MD ,&nbsp;Thomas Williams MD ,&nbsp;Frédéric Dubrana PhD ,&nbsp;Arthur Dellestable MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The indications for glenohumeral arthrodesis<span> are severe lesions of the supra-clavicular brachial plexus<span>. This is a demanding surgery with numerous complications. To reduce morbidity, a few rare arthroscopic techniques have been developed. We compared arthroscopic shoulder arthrodesis with open arthrodesis. Our hypothesis is that the results of arthroscopic arthrodesis would be at least as good as open arthrodesis in terms of strength and mobility, and better in terms of complications.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixteen patients underwent arthrodesis for sequelae<span> of complete brachial plexus palsy between 2008 and 2022. The procedures were performed in our university hospital by experienced surgeons. Six patients underwent open arthrodesis, and 10 arthroscopically. Data were collected retrospectively. A clinical assessment was carried out preoperative and monthly until bone fusion. Clinical examination included measurement of flexion, abduction, and rotation amplitudes. Strength was assessed. Secondary endpoints included pain assessment, operative time, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons index, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and Simple Shoulder Test. Radiographs were analyzed at each consultation until bone fusion was acquired.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average age of the patients was 28 years. Mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 49.38 months. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups on preoperative data. The vast majority of brachial plexus palsies were due to road traffic accidents. Patients underwent arthrodesis on an average of 29 months after the accident. There was a statistically significant difference (<em>P</em><span> = .034) in the postoperative complication rate in favor of the arthroscopic group. There was no significant difference in mobility or strength. There were no significant differences in pain levels or scores, either pre- or postoperatively.</span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results of arthroscopic shoulder arthrodesis are at least as good as open arthrodesis in terms of strength and mobility, and better in terms of complications. The most frequent complications are pseudarthrodesis, humeral fractures, infection, and pain. It would be interesting to carry out a multicenter, prospective study to confirm our results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":"34 10","pages":"Pages e879-e889"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274625001715","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The indications for glenohumeral arthrodesis are severe lesions of the supra-clavicular brachial plexus. This is a demanding surgery with numerous complications. To reduce morbidity, a few rare arthroscopic techniques have been developed. We compared arthroscopic shoulder arthrodesis with open arthrodesis. Our hypothesis is that the results of arthroscopic arthrodesis would be at least as good as open arthrodesis in terms of strength and mobility, and better in terms of complications.

Methods

Sixteen patients underwent arthrodesis for sequelae of complete brachial plexus palsy between 2008 and 2022. The procedures were performed in our university hospital by experienced surgeons. Six patients underwent open arthrodesis, and 10 arthroscopically. Data were collected retrospectively. A clinical assessment was carried out preoperative and monthly until bone fusion. Clinical examination included measurement of flexion, abduction, and rotation amplitudes. Strength was assessed. Secondary endpoints included pain assessment, operative time, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons index, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and Simple Shoulder Test. Radiographs were analyzed at each consultation until bone fusion was acquired.

Results

The average age of the patients was 28 years. Mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 49.38 months. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups on preoperative data. The vast majority of brachial plexus palsies were due to road traffic accidents. Patients underwent arthrodesis on an average of 29 months after the accident. There was a statistically significant difference (P = .034) in the postoperative complication rate in favor of the arthroscopic group. There was no significant difference in mobility or strength. There were no significant differences in pain levels or scores, either pre- or postoperatively.

Conclusion

The results of arthroscopic shoulder arthrodesis are at least as good as open arthrodesis in terms of strength and mobility, and better in terms of complications. The most frequent complications are pseudarthrodesis, humeral fractures, infection, and pain. It would be interesting to carry out a multicenter, prospective study to confirm our results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
臂丛神经麻痹的盂肱关节融合术:开放手术还是关节镜?回顾性比较研究。
背景:盂肱关节融合术的适应症是严重的锁骨上臂丛病变。这是一个要求很高的手术,有很多并发症。为了降低发病率,一些罕见的关节镜技术已经被开发出来。我们比较了关节镜下肩关节融合术和开放式肩关节融合术。我们的假设是,关节镜下关节融合术的结果至少与开放关节融合术在力量和活动方面一样好,在并发症方面更好。方法:2008年至2022年间,16例完全性臂丛神经麻痹后遗症患者行关节融合术。手术在我校医院由经验丰富的外科医生进行。6例患者行开放关节融合术,10例行关节镜下手术。回顾性收集资料。术前和每月进行临床评估,直至骨融合。临床检查包括测量屈曲、外展和旋转幅度。评估了强度。次要终点包括疼痛评估、手术时间、美国肩肘外科医生指数、手臂、肩和手的残疾评分和简单肩部测试。每次会诊时均分析x线片,直至获得骨融合。结果:患者平均年龄28岁。关节融合术后平均随访时间49.38个月。两组术前资料比较,差异无统计学意义。绝大多数臂丛神经麻痹是由道路交通事故引起的。患者在事故发生后平均29个月接受了关节融合术。关节镜组术后并发症发生率差异有统计学意义(p = 0.034)。在活动能力和力量方面没有显著差异。无论是术前还是术后,疼痛程度和评分均无显著差异。结论:关节镜下肩关节融合术在力量和活动方面至少与开放关节融合术一样好,在并发症方面更佳。最常见的并发症是假关节融合术、肱骨骨折、感染和疼痛。开展一项多中心的前瞻性研究来证实我们的结果将是一件有趣的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Long Term clinical and radiological outcomes of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 15 years. Cohort of 101 consecutive Nexel total elbow arthroplasties. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Outcomes. Outcomes of Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Utilizing Bulk Femoral Head Allograft with a Monoblock Central Screw Baseplate for Severe Glenoid Defects with Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Quality of surgical technique in patients with a humeral shaft fracture in the HUMMER study (HUMMER-Survey); an international survey among expert surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1