Comparison of an Emergency Medicine Asynchronous Learning Platform Usage Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Analysis Study.

IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES JMIR Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.2196/58100
Blake Briggs, Madhuri Mulekar, Hannah Morales, Iltifat Husain
{"title":"Comparison of an Emergency Medicine Asynchronous Learning Platform Usage Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Analysis Study.","authors":"Blake Briggs, Madhuri Mulekar, Hannah Morales, Iltifat Husain","doi":"10.2196/58100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic challenged medical educators due to social distancing. Podcasts and asynchronous learning platforms help distill medical education in a socially distanced environment. Medical educators interested in providing asynchronous teaching should know how these methods performed during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the level of engagement for an emergency medicine (EM) board review podcast and website platform, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We measured engagement via website traffic, including such metrics as visits, bounce rate, unique visitors, and page views. We also evaluated podcast analytics, which included total listeners, engaged listeners, and number of plays.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Content was designed after the American Board of EM Model, covering only 1 review question per episode. Website traffic and podcast analytics were studied monthly from 2 time periods of 20 months each, before the pandemic (July 11, 2018, to February 31, 2020) and during the pandemic (May 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021). March and April 2020 data were omitted from the analysis due to variations in closure at various domestic and international locations. Results underwent statistical analysis in March 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 132 podcast episodes and 93 handouts were released from July 11, 2018, to December 31, 2021. The mean number of listeners per podcast increased significantly from 2.11 (SD 1.19) to 3.77 (SD 0.76; t test, P<.001), the mean number engaged per podcast increased from 1.72 (SD 1.00) to 3.09 (SD 0.62; t test, P<.001), and the mean number of plays per podcast increased from 42.54 (SD 40.66) to 69.23 (SD 17.54; t test, P=.012). Similarly, the mean number of visits per posting increased from 5.85 (SD 3.28) to 15.39 (SD 3.06; t test, P<.001), the mean number of unique visitors per posting increased from 3.74 (SD 1.83) to 10.41 (SD 2.33; t test, P<.001), and the mean number of page views per posting increased from 17.13 (SD 10.63) to 33.32 (SD 7.01; t test, P<.001). Note that, all measures showed a decrease from November 2021 to December 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increased engagement for our EM board review podcast and website platform over a long-term period, specifically through website visitors and the number of podcast plays. Medical educators should be aware of the increasing usage of web-based education tools, and that asynchronous learning is favorably viewed by learners. Limitations include the inability to view Spotify (Spotify Technology S.A.) analytics during the study period, and confounding factors like increased popularity of social media inadvertently promoting the podcast.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"11 ","pages":"e58100"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11870596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/58100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic challenged medical educators due to social distancing. Podcasts and asynchronous learning platforms help distill medical education in a socially distanced environment. Medical educators interested in providing asynchronous teaching should know how these methods performed during the pandemic.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the level of engagement for an emergency medicine (EM) board review podcast and website platform, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We measured engagement via website traffic, including such metrics as visits, bounce rate, unique visitors, and page views. We also evaluated podcast analytics, which included total listeners, engaged listeners, and number of plays.

Methods: Content was designed after the American Board of EM Model, covering only 1 review question per episode. Website traffic and podcast analytics were studied monthly from 2 time periods of 20 months each, before the pandemic (July 11, 2018, to February 31, 2020) and during the pandemic (May 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021). March and April 2020 data were omitted from the analysis due to variations in closure at various domestic and international locations. Results underwent statistical analysis in March 2022.

Results: A total of 132 podcast episodes and 93 handouts were released from July 11, 2018, to December 31, 2021. The mean number of listeners per podcast increased significantly from 2.11 (SD 1.19) to 3.77 (SD 0.76; t test, P<.001), the mean number engaged per podcast increased from 1.72 (SD 1.00) to 3.09 (SD 0.62; t test, P<.001), and the mean number of plays per podcast increased from 42.54 (SD 40.66) to 69.23 (SD 17.54; t test, P=.012). Similarly, the mean number of visits per posting increased from 5.85 (SD 3.28) to 15.39 (SD 3.06; t test, P<.001), the mean number of unique visitors per posting increased from 3.74 (SD 1.83) to 10.41 (SD 2.33; t test, P<.001), and the mean number of page views per posting increased from 17.13 (SD 10.63) to 33.32 (SD 7.01; t test, P<.001). Note that, all measures showed a decrease from November 2021 to December 2021.

Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increased engagement for our EM board review podcast and website platform over a long-term period, specifically through website visitors and the number of podcast plays. Medical educators should be aware of the increasing usage of web-based education tools, and that asynchronous learning is favorably viewed by learners. Limitations include the inability to view Spotify (Spotify Technology S.A.) analytics during the study period, and confounding factors like increased popularity of social media inadvertently promoting the podcast.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行前后急诊医学异步学习平台使用情况比较:回顾性分析研究
背景:新冠肺炎大流行给医学教育工作者带来了社会距离挑战。播客和异步学习平台有助于在社交远程环境中提炼医学教育。对提供异步教学感兴趣的医学教育工作者应了解这些方法在大流行期间的表现。目的:本研究的目的是评估在COVID-19大流行之前和期间急诊医学(EM)委员会审查播客和网站平台的参与水平。我们通过网站流量来衡量用户粘性,包括访问量、跳出率、独立访问者和页面浏览量等指标。我们还评估了播客分析,其中包括总听众、参与听众和播放次数。方法:内容按照美国医学委员会模型设计,每集只包含1个复习题。在大流行之前(2018年7月11日至2020年2月31日)和大流行期间(2020年5月1日至2021年12月31日),每月对网站流量和播客分析进行两个时间段的研究,每个时间段为20个月。由于国内和国际不同地点的关闭情况不同,2020年3月和4月的数据在分析中被省略。结果于2022年3月进行统计分析。结果:2018年7月11日至2021年12月31日,共发布了132集播客和93份讲义。每个播客的平均听众人数从2.11 (SD 1.19)显著增加到3.77 (SD 0.76);结论:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,我们的新兴市场董事会审查播客和网站平台的长期参与度有所增加,特别是通过网站访问者和播客播放数量。医学教育工作者应该意识到基于网络的教育工具的使用越来越多,并且学习者对异步学习持积极态度。限制包括在研究期间无法查看Spotify (Spotify Technology S.A.)的分析,以及社交媒体日益普及无意中促进播客等混杂因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Education
JMIR Medical Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gender and Racial Discrimination During Residency Training: Scoping Review. Authors' Reply: Why Medical Education Without Artificial Intelligence Still Matters: A Neuroscience-Informed Perspective. Why Medical Education Without Artificial Intelligence Still Matters: A Neuroscience-Informed Perspective. Susceptibility of Assessment Types to AI-Generated Content in Digital Health and Health Information Management Education: Quasi-Experimental Pilot Study. Virtual Reality Versus In-Person Simulation of Sepsis for Medical Students: Randomized Comparative Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1