The Direct Anterior Approach for AO/OTA43B and 43C Pilon Injuries.

Laura E Sokil, Liam Wong, Elizabeth Roti, Graham J DeKeyser, Zachary M Working, Darin M Friess, James E Meeker
{"title":"The Direct Anterior Approach for AO/OTA43B and 43C Pilon Injuries.","authors":"Laura E Sokil, Liam Wong, Elizabeth Roti, Graham J DeKeyser, Zachary M Working, Darin M Friess, James E Meeker","doi":"10.1177/10711007251315095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pilon fractures carry high rates of early wound healing, infectious complications, and late posttraumatic arthrosis. When reconstructive procedures are indicated, these patients are at further risk for early complications. Perhaps using the same direct anterior (DA) approach for initial repair and later reconstruction might mitigate these risks, but the DA approach has not been explored for initial repair. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the DA approach for internal fixation of pilon fractures. We hypothesized that the reoperation rate for fractures treated with the DA approach would not differ from other surgical approaches in our series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart and radiographic review of operative Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 43B and C fractures from 2013 to 2022 were undertaken. Using Kaplan-Meier estimations, the likelihood of reoperation within 1 year of index surgery was analyzed. Reoperation risk factors were determined using multivariable logistic regression analyses created using a backward stepwise process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 135 fractures in 130 patients were eligible for review. The overall reoperation rate was 40.7%. There was no significant difference between DA and all other approaches for rate of reoperation for infection (2.3% vs 10%, <i>P</i> = .21), nonunion (15.9% vs 16.5%, <i>P</i> > .99), posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) (9.1% vs 7.8%, <i>P</i> > .99), and removal of symptomatic hardware (25% vs 36.3%, <i>P</i> = .27). In multivariate regression analysis, DA approach was associated with a lower rate of reoperation within 1 year (odds ratio 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.71, <i>P</i> = .015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The direct anterior approach can perform well for fixation of AO/OTA 43B and C fractures. Our retrospective series showed a favorable risk of reoperation at 1 year and a similar overall reoperation rate compared with all other combinations of approaches. Many factors determine the surgical approach to pilon fractures. This study has shown that the DA approach merits consideration as an option for open reduction and internal fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"10711007251315095"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251315095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pilon fractures carry high rates of early wound healing, infectious complications, and late posttraumatic arthrosis. When reconstructive procedures are indicated, these patients are at further risk for early complications. Perhaps using the same direct anterior (DA) approach for initial repair and later reconstruction might mitigate these risks, but the DA approach has not been explored for initial repair. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the DA approach for internal fixation of pilon fractures. We hypothesized that the reoperation rate for fractures treated with the DA approach would not differ from other surgical approaches in our series.

Methods: A retrospective chart and radiographic review of operative Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 43B and C fractures from 2013 to 2022 were undertaken. Using Kaplan-Meier estimations, the likelihood of reoperation within 1 year of index surgery was analyzed. Reoperation risk factors were determined using multivariable logistic regression analyses created using a backward stepwise process.

Results: A total of 135 fractures in 130 patients were eligible for review. The overall reoperation rate was 40.7%. There was no significant difference between DA and all other approaches for rate of reoperation for infection (2.3% vs 10%, P = .21), nonunion (15.9% vs 16.5%, P > .99), posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) (9.1% vs 7.8%, P > .99), and removal of symptomatic hardware (25% vs 36.3%, P = .27). In multivariate regression analysis, DA approach was associated with a lower rate of reoperation within 1 year (odds ratio 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.71, P = .015).

Conclusion: The direct anterior approach can perform well for fixation of AO/OTA 43B and C fractures. Our retrospective series showed a favorable risk of reoperation at 1 year and a similar overall reoperation rate compared with all other combinations of approaches. Many factors determine the surgical approach to pilon fractures. This study has shown that the DA approach merits consideration as an option for open reduction and internal fixation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Direct Anterior Approach for AO/OTA43B and 43C Pilon Injuries. Anatomical Study of Nerve Injuries With Minimally Invasive Calcaneus Osteotomies. Association of Factors Related to the Size and Hepple Classification of Medial Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus. Utility of 3D Wound Assessment in Monitoring Granulation Tissue Velocity Following Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcers. The Shape of Things to Come.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1