Anatomical Study of Nerve Injuries With Minimally Invasive Calcaneus Osteotomies.

IF 2.2 Foot & ankle international Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1177/10711007251319248
Maria Felsberg, Martha Adamik, Sebastian Schilde, Heike Kielstein, Karl-Stefan Delank, Alexander Zeh, Dariusch Arbab, Natalia Gutteck
{"title":"Anatomical Study of Nerve Injuries With Minimally Invasive Calcaneus Osteotomies.","authors":"Maria Felsberg, Martha Adamik, Sebastian Schilde, Heike Kielstein, Karl-Stefan Delank, Alexander Zeh, Dariusch Arbab, Natalia Gutteck","doi":"10.1177/10711007251319248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Calcaneal osteotomy is frequently used in correcting various foot deformities. Minimally invasive procedures such as minimally invasive calcaneus osteotomy (MICO) have become established because of their more favorable risk profile. The literature describes a safe zone for performing the osteotomy to protect the nerve structures. Overall, the existence of a \"safe zone\" remains controversial. The aim of this anatomical study was to determine the risk of nerve injury in the context of MICO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty fresh frozen specimens were randomized to a V-shaped and oblique MICO groups. Following the skin incision, the osteotomies were performed with a Shannon burr. The nerve structures were then investigated both medially and laterally. After visualization of the osteotomy plane, standardized distance measurements were taken from the plane to the nerve and injuries were detected. Radiographs were then taken of all specimens, and the safe zone on each was measured and outlined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evaluation of the safe zone showed that in 17 of 20 cases the osteotomies we performed were located within the safe zone. We found 10 nerve injuries on 8 of 20 specimens. The medial calcaneal nerve was most vulnerable Overall, we found no significant correlation between the frequency of injured nerves and the type of osteotomy (<i>P</i> <i>=</i> .361).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MICO is a procedure with a low-risk profile. We found that nerve injuries can occur despite compliance with surgical standards and the relative \"safe zone\" previously described. Other options for protecting the nerve structures and further investigations into the type of osteotomies should be carried out. The clinical relevance of these findings remains to be investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"429-434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251319248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Calcaneal osteotomy is frequently used in correcting various foot deformities. Minimally invasive procedures such as minimally invasive calcaneus osteotomy (MICO) have become established because of their more favorable risk profile. The literature describes a safe zone for performing the osteotomy to protect the nerve structures. Overall, the existence of a "safe zone" remains controversial. The aim of this anatomical study was to determine the risk of nerve injury in the context of MICO.

Methods: Twenty fresh frozen specimens were randomized to a V-shaped and oblique MICO groups. Following the skin incision, the osteotomies were performed with a Shannon burr. The nerve structures were then investigated both medially and laterally. After visualization of the osteotomy plane, standardized distance measurements were taken from the plane to the nerve and injuries were detected. Radiographs were then taken of all specimens, and the safe zone on each was measured and outlined.

Results: The evaluation of the safe zone showed that in 17 of 20 cases the osteotomies we performed were located within the safe zone. We found 10 nerve injuries on 8 of 20 specimens. The medial calcaneal nerve was most vulnerable Overall, we found no significant correlation between the frequency of injured nerves and the type of osteotomy (P= .361).

Conclusion: MICO is a procedure with a low-risk profile. We found that nerve injuries can occur despite compliance with surgical standards and the relative "safe zone" previously described. Other options for protecting the nerve structures and further investigations into the type of osteotomies should be carried out. The clinical relevance of these findings remains to be investigated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创钙骨截骨术神经损伤的解剖学研究
背景:跟骨截骨术常用于纠正各种足部畸形。微创手术,如微创跟骨截骨术(MICO)已经建立,因为他们更有利的风险。文献描述了进行截骨术以保护神经结构的安全区域。总的来说,“安全区”的存在仍然存在争议。本解剖研究的目的是确定MICO背景下神经损伤的风险。方法:20例新鲜冷冻标本随机分为v型组和斜向组。皮肤切口后,采用香农毛刺进行截骨术。然后在内侧和外侧检查神经结构。截骨平面可视化后,从截骨平面到神经的标准化距离测量和损伤检测。然后对所有标本拍x光片,并对每个标本的安全区域进行测量和勾画。结果:安全区域评估显示,20例患者中有17例位于安全区域内。我们发现20个标本中有8个有10处神经损伤。总的来说,我们发现神经损伤的频率与截骨方式之间没有显著的相关性(P = .361)。结论:MICO是一种低风险的手术。我们发现,尽管符合手术标准和先前描述的相对“安全区”,神经损伤仍可能发生。保护神经结构的其他选择和对截骨类型的进一步调查应该进行。这些发现的临床相关性仍有待研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Union Outcomes in Medial and Central Column Tarsometatarsal Fusions: Single vs Multiple Joints. Postoperative Opioid Use Is Uncommon After Third- and Fourth-Generation Percutaneous Hallux Valgus Surgery: A Prospective Single-Surgeon Case Series. Radiographic Osseointegration Appears Similar Across Synthetic, Allograft, and Mixed Grafts in Custom 3D-Printed Cage Reconstruction of the Foot and Ankle: A Short Report. Arthroscopic Bone Marrow Stimulation for Non-primary Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus Yields Limited Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes Compared to Primary Lesions: A Prospective 2-Year Follow-up Study. Full Circle in Talar Osteochondral Defect Treatment: A 3-Decade Return to Microfracture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1