Patient Satisfaction with Remote Pre-Anesthesia Assessment Via Telephone.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2024.0067
Armin Langauer, Gernot Gerger, Sabine Völkl-Kernstock, Maria Kletecka-Pulker, Nikolaus Graf, Aylin Bilir, David M Baron
{"title":"Patient Satisfaction with Remote Pre-Anesthesia Assessment Via Telephone.","authors":"Armin Langauer, Gernot Gerger, Sabine Völkl-Kernstock, Maria Kletecka-Pulker, Nikolaus Graf, Aylin Bilir, David M Baron","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2024.0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of telemedicine can contribute to patient satisfaction, support hygienic concepts by avoiding physical contact when not required, and reduce waiting and travel time. We aimed to evaluate our recently implemented telemedical approach of remote pre-anesthesia assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with remote pre-anesthesia assessment procedures, completeness of understanding, and technical feasibility. In total, 250 patients were asked to voluntarily complete the questionnaire after their pre-anesthesia assessment via telephone. Digital anesthesia records were subsequently reviewed for unexpected events and complications to investigate the quality and safety of the approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients included in our study were 51 years old (median, range 18-85 years), mostly female (58%) and had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of 1-3 (22.8%, 56.4%, and 20.8%, respectively). Patient satisfaction was high with ratings of \"very good\" or \"good\" in over 90% of all questions related to the pre-anesthesia assessment via telephone. Patient's evaluation for the use of telemedicine in general also showed a wide acceptance with 84.4% rating the idea as \"very good\" (55.6%) or \"good\" (28.8%). Duration of patient-physician interaction positively correlated with age (<i>p</i> = 0.005) and ASA status (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Upon review of the digital anesthesia records, there were no intraoperative complications or unexpected events related to the remote pre-anesthesia assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remote pre-anesthesia assessment via telephone is safe, technically feasible, and satisfactorily accepted in selected patients. These results encourage the continuing implementation of telemedical approaches for pre-anesthesia assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94218,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"27-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2024.0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of telemedicine can contribute to patient satisfaction, support hygienic concepts by avoiding physical contact when not required, and reduce waiting and travel time. We aimed to evaluate our recently implemented telemedical approach of remote pre-anesthesia assessment.

Methods: We designed a questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with remote pre-anesthesia assessment procedures, completeness of understanding, and technical feasibility. In total, 250 patients were asked to voluntarily complete the questionnaire after their pre-anesthesia assessment via telephone. Digital anesthesia records were subsequently reviewed for unexpected events and complications to investigate the quality and safety of the approach.

Results: Patients included in our study were 51 years old (median, range 18-85 years), mostly female (58%) and had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of 1-3 (22.8%, 56.4%, and 20.8%, respectively). Patient satisfaction was high with ratings of "very good" or "good" in over 90% of all questions related to the pre-anesthesia assessment via telephone. Patient's evaluation for the use of telemedicine in general also showed a wide acceptance with 84.4% rating the idea as "very good" (55.6%) or "good" (28.8%). Duration of patient-physician interaction positively correlated with age (p = 0.005) and ASA status (p = 0.003). Upon review of the digital anesthesia records, there were no intraoperative complications or unexpected events related to the remote pre-anesthesia assessment.

Conclusion: Remote pre-anesthesia assessment via telephone is safe, technically feasible, and satisfactorily accepted in selected patients. These results encourage the continuing implementation of telemedical approaches for pre-anesthesia assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Selling the Return on Investment for Digital Health. Knowledge, Readiness, Willingness-to-Use, and Willingness-to-Pay for Telehealth in Nonlife-Threatening Emergency Department Visits. Patient Satisfaction with Remote Pre-Anesthesia Assessment Via Telephone. Characteristics and Outcomes of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Patients Managed Through Inpatient Asynchronous Teledermatology: A Retrospective Study. Home Cardiotocography in High-Risk Pregnancies: A Retrospective Study on Feasibility and Patient Well-Being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1