{"title":"Healthy labels, healthy portions? The impact of favorable nutri-scores on consumers' portion size selection and food intake","authors":"Eva Heeremans, Maggie Geuens, Iris Vermeir","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While front-of-pack labels have been found to positively impact purchase intentions and food choices, their potential negative impact on portion sizes and food intake remains understudied. We focused on the Nutri-Score, a front-of-pack label that summarizes the nutritional quality of foods with a five color-letter combination. We tested whether favorable Nutri-Scores (A and B) increased consumers' portion sizes and their actual food intake. In five online experiments, participants were presented with six portion size photographs and an option to not consume for four to twelve products per study. In two lab experiments, we measured the weight of two foods consumed on a single occasion. The results do not support our main proposition that the presence of favorable Nutri-Scores, compared to the absence of Nutri-Scores, would lead to larger selected portion sizes and an increased food intake. Neither did the results support an indirect effect of favorable Nutri-Scores on portion sizes or food intake via (1) perceptions of appropriate portion sizes, (2) the use of product healthiness as a justification cue, or (3) reduced guilt feelings. No support was found for perceived product healthiness as a moderator of the effects. These research findings mean good news, as they suggest that promoting healthier options through favorable Nutri-Scores does not inadvertently lead to larger portions or food intake. This has important implications for policy makers, retailers, and manufacturers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 105485"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000606","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While front-of-pack labels have been found to positively impact purchase intentions and food choices, their potential negative impact on portion sizes and food intake remains understudied. We focused on the Nutri-Score, a front-of-pack label that summarizes the nutritional quality of foods with a five color-letter combination. We tested whether favorable Nutri-Scores (A and B) increased consumers' portion sizes and their actual food intake. In five online experiments, participants were presented with six portion size photographs and an option to not consume for four to twelve products per study. In two lab experiments, we measured the weight of two foods consumed on a single occasion. The results do not support our main proposition that the presence of favorable Nutri-Scores, compared to the absence of Nutri-Scores, would lead to larger selected portion sizes and an increased food intake. Neither did the results support an indirect effect of favorable Nutri-Scores on portion sizes or food intake via (1) perceptions of appropriate portion sizes, (2) the use of product healthiness as a justification cue, or (3) reduced guilt feelings. No support was found for perceived product healthiness as a moderator of the effects. These research findings mean good news, as they suggest that promoting healthier options through favorable Nutri-Scores does not inadvertently lead to larger portions or food intake. This has important implications for policy makers, retailers, and manufacturers.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.