Association between body roundness index and suicidal ideation in U.S. adults: A cross-sectional study

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Preventive Medicine Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103018
Pincheng Luo , Omar M. Alruwaili , Huanlin Zhou , Yanxue Lian
{"title":"Association between body roundness index and suicidal ideation in U.S. adults: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Pincheng Luo ,&nbsp;Omar M. Alruwaili ,&nbsp;Huanlin Zhou ,&nbsp;Yanxue Lian","doi":"10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The relationship between the body roundness index (BRI) and suicidal ideation has not been previously examined. This study aimed to investigate this association through a cross-sectional analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The data used in this study was extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey ranging from 2011 to 2012 to 2017–2018. The BRI was calculated from body measurement data, while a questionnaire was used to assess suicidal ideation. Weighted multivariable logistic regression analysis, weighted stratified analysis, and smooth curve fitting were conducted to assess the relationship between the BRI and suicidal ideation. <strong>Results:</strong> A total of 12,878 participants were included in the study with 441 of them reported experiencing suicidal thoughts. After adjusted for all covariates, a one-unit increase in BRI was associated with a 5 % greater likelihood of having suicidal thoughts [1.05 (1.00, 1.10)]. Additionally, BRI was categorized into quartiles, and individuals in the highest quartile were 1.52 times as likely to experience suicidal thoughts compared to those in the lowest quartile [1.52 (1.03, 2.25)]. There were no interaction effects between BRI and suicidal ideation for any subgroups stratified by demographics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The present study indicated that a greater BRI was significantly associated with higher levels of suicidal ideation. The findings underscore the importance of considering BRI as a potential indicator for identifying individuals at elevated risk of suicidal ideation. The study also emphasizes the need for a shift towards a weight-inclusive approach in public health, which can help reduce societal pressures and mitigate the psychological impact of weight stigma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38066,"journal":{"name":"Preventive Medicine Reports","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 103018"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive Medicine Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335525000579","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The relationship between the body roundness index (BRI) and suicidal ideation has not been previously examined. This study aimed to investigate this association through a cross-sectional analysis.

Method

The data used in this study was extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey ranging from 2011 to 2012 to 2017–2018. The BRI was calculated from body measurement data, while a questionnaire was used to assess suicidal ideation. Weighted multivariable logistic regression analysis, weighted stratified analysis, and smooth curve fitting were conducted to assess the relationship between the BRI and suicidal ideation. Results: A total of 12,878 participants were included in the study with 441 of them reported experiencing suicidal thoughts. After adjusted for all covariates, a one-unit increase in BRI was associated with a 5 % greater likelihood of having suicidal thoughts [1.05 (1.00, 1.10)]. Additionally, BRI was categorized into quartiles, and individuals in the highest quartile were 1.52 times as likely to experience suicidal thoughts compared to those in the lowest quartile [1.52 (1.03, 2.25)]. There were no interaction effects between BRI and suicidal ideation for any subgroups stratified by demographics.

Conclusion

The present study indicated that a greater BRI was significantly associated with higher levels of suicidal ideation. The findings underscore the importance of considering BRI as a potential indicator for identifying individuals at elevated risk of suicidal ideation. The study also emphasizes the need for a shift towards a weight-inclusive approach in public health, which can help reduce societal pressures and mitigate the psychological impact of weight stigma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive Medicine Reports
Preventive Medicine Reports Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
期刊最新文献
Exploring longitudinal associations between social determinants of health during adolescence and self-reported contraceptive use in young adulthood in the United States The global, regional and national burden of peptic ulcer disease attributable to smoking from 1990 to 2021: A population-based study Associations between youth lifestyle habits, sociodemographic characteristics, and health status with positive mental health: A gender-based analysis in a sample of Canadian postsecondary students Association between body roundness index and suicidal ideation in U.S. adults: A cross-sectional study Anticipated effects of an unconditional cash transfer program: A qualitative community-engaged planning study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1