Anticipated effects of an unconditional cash transfer program: A qualitative community-engaged planning study

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Preventive Medicine Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103014
Rebeccah Sokol , Max Glick , Stephanie Hall , Stephen Y. Nose , Erinn Johnson , Jennifer Poma
{"title":"Anticipated effects of an unconditional cash transfer program: A qualitative community-engaged planning study","authors":"Rebeccah Sokol ,&nbsp;Max Glick ,&nbsp;Stephanie Hall ,&nbsp;Stephen Y. Nose ,&nbsp;Erinn Johnson ,&nbsp;Jennifer Poma","doi":"10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This community-engaged study explored the perspectives of residents in Oakland County, Michigan, who were experiencing poverty to understand how a proposed short-term unconditional cash transfer program may or may not influence their health and well-being.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Community partners recruited low-income residents to participate in focus groups. Six focus groups with 34 participants, aged 25–82, were held in 2023. In 2024, the team used qualitative content analysis to understand the anticipated effects of an unconditional cash transfer program.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 34 participants, 25 (74 %) were at or below 100 % of the federal poverty level. Participants identified their health and well-being priorities broadly, encompassing physical and mental health for themselves and their families, family enrichment, and safety. Participants often described their priorities in tandem with barriers. The most cited barrier was insufficient funds, which created other social risk factors (e.g., food insecurity, inaccessible healthcare). Participants discussed using funds from an unconditional cash transfer program to address diverse social risk factors, including using funds to pay for utilities or to move to a different neighborhood. Participants described how beneficiaries may use funds to pay existing debt, but may not have the opportunity to build financial security.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Low-income community members viewed a short-term unconditional cash transfer program as having promising, but diverse and limited, effects on individual health and well-being. Centering beneficiaries' priorities and intended uses within plans to design, implement, and evaluate unconditional cash transfers may help programs observe positive gains in health and well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38066,"journal":{"name":"Preventive Medicine Reports","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 103014"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive Medicine Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335525000531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This community-engaged study explored the perspectives of residents in Oakland County, Michigan, who were experiencing poverty to understand how a proposed short-term unconditional cash transfer program may or may not influence their health and well-being.

Methods

Community partners recruited low-income residents to participate in focus groups. Six focus groups with 34 participants, aged 25–82, were held in 2023. In 2024, the team used qualitative content analysis to understand the anticipated effects of an unconditional cash transfer program.

Results

Among the 34 participants, 25 (74 %) were at or below 100 % of the federal poverty level. Participants identified their health and well-being priorities broadly, encompassing physical and mental health for themselves and their families, family enrichment, and safety. Participants often described their priorities in tandem with barriers. The most cited barrier was insufficient funds, which created other social risk factors (e.g., food insecurity, inaccessible healthcare). Participants discussed using funds from an unconditional cash transfer program to address diverse social risk factors, including using funds to pay for utilities or to move to a different neighborhood. Participants described how beneficiaries may use funds to pay existing debt, but may not have the opportunity to build financial security.

Conclusions

Low-income community members viewed a short-term unconditional cash transfer program as having promising, but diverse and limited, effects on individual health and well-being. Centering beneficiaries' priorities and intended uses within plans to design, implement, and evaluate unconditional cash transfers may help programs observe positive gains in health and well-being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive Medicine Reports
Preventive Medicine Reports Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
期刊最新文献
Exploring longitudinal associations between social determinants of health during adolescence and self-reported contraceptive use in young adulthood in the United States The global, regional and national burden of peptic ulcer disease attributable to smoking from 1990 to 2021: A population-based study Associations between youth lifestyle habits, sociodemographic characteristics, and health status with positive mental health: A gender-based analysis in a sample of Canadian postsecondary students Association between body roundness index and suicidal ideation in U.S. adults: A cross-sectional study Anticipated effects of an unconditional cash transfer program: A qualitative community-engaged planning study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1