Associations of multiple plasma metals with the risk of type 2 diabetes in Chinese adults: A cross-sectional study

IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.117941
Liting Yang , Jin Chen , Zijun Yao , Junwei Cai , Han Zhang , Zhen Wang , Huailan Guo , Yongjiu Zha
{"title":"Associations of multiple plasma metals with the risk of type 2 diabetes in Chinese adults: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Liting Yang ,&nbsp;Jin Chen ,&nbsp;Zijun Yao ,&nbsp;Junwei Cai ,&nbsp;Han Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhen Wang ,&nbsp;Huailan Guo ,&nbsp;Yongjiu Zha","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.117941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evidence regarding the associations between co-exposure to multiple metals and diabetes risk was scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the associations of multiple metals with diabetes risk using multiple statistical methods. This cross-sectional study included 192 diabetic patients and 189 healthy subjects. We employed inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to determine the plasma concentrations of 18 metals. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, logistic regression, and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) were applied to evaluate associations of multiple metals with diabetes risk comprehensively. These models consistently suggested that aluminium and selenium were positively associated with diabetes risk, while manganese, rubidium, and lead were negatively associated with diabetes risk. Age-specific differences of selenium and sex-specific differences of manganese in diabetes risk were also observed based on stratified analyses. According to RCS analyses, we obtained dose-response relationships between metals and diabetes risk:(1) there were inverted U-shaped associations of plasma aluminium and selenium with diabetes risk, with the threshold close to 20.5µg/L and 75.9µg/L, respectively (both P for overall &lt; 0.05; both P for non-linearity &lt; 0.05). (2) There were L-shaped associations of rubidium and lead with diabetes risk, with the turning point close to 144.5µg/L and 2.5µg/L, respectively (both P for overall &lt; 0.05; both P for non-linearity &lt; 0.05). (3) Manganese was linearly and negatively correlated with diabetes risk when concentrations of manganese were less than approximately 4.2 μg/L (P for overall &lt; 0.05; P for non-linearity = 0.268). The BKMR model also revealed a negative combined effect of metal mixtures on diabetes risk and potential interactions between six pairs of metals (aluminium-manganese, aluminium-selenium, aluminium-rubidium, aluminium-lead, manganese-selenium, and manganese-rubidium). In summary, we need to pay attention to the role of low plasma levels of aluminium, selenium, manganese, rubidium, and lead in diabetes, especially regarding their safety windows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":303,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 117941"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651325002775","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence regarding the associations between co-exposure to multiple metals and diabetes risk was scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the associations of multiple metals with diabetes risk using multiple statistical methods. This cross-sectional study included 192 diabetic patients and 189 healthy subjects. We employed inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to determine the plasma concentrations of 18 metals. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, logistic regression, and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) were applied to evaluate associations of multiple metals with diabetes risk comprehensively. These models consistently suggested that aluminium and selenium were positively associated with diabetes risk, while manganese, rubidium, and lead were negatively associated with diabetes risk. Age-specific differences of selenium and sex-specific differences of manganese in diabetes risk were also observed based on stratified analyses. According to RCS analyses, we obtained dose-response relationships between metals and diabetes risk:(1) there were inverted U-shaped associations of plasma aluminium and selenium with diabetes risk, with the threshold close to 20.5µg/L and 75.9µg/L, respectively (both P for overall < 0.05; both P for non-linearity < 0.05). (2) There were L-shaped associations of rubidium and lead with diabetes risk, with the turning point close to 144.5µg/L and 2.5µg/L, respectively (both P for overall < 0.05; both P for non-linearity < 0.05). (3) Manganese was linearly and negatively correlated with diabetes risk when concentrations of manganese were less than approximately 4.2 μg/L (P for overall < 0.05; P for non-linearity = 0.268). The BKMR model also revealed a negative combined effect of metal mixtures on diabetes risk and potential interactions between six pairs of metals (aluminium-manganese, aluminium-selenium, aluminium-rubidium, aluminium-lead, manganese-selenium, and manganese-rubidium). In summary, we need to pay attention to the role of low plasma levels of aluminium, selenium, manganese, rubidium, and lead in diabetes, especially regarding their safety windows.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国成人血浆中多种金属与2型糖尿病风险的关系:一项横断面研究
关于共同接触多种金属与糖尿病风险之间关系的证据很少。本研究旨在通过多种统计方法评估多种金属与糖尿病风险的关系。本横断面研究包括192名糖尿病患者和189名健康受试者。采用电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS)测定了18种金属的血浆浓度。应用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归、逻辑回归和贝叶斯核机回归(BKMR)综合评价多种金属与糖尿病风险的相关性。这些模型一致表明,铝和硒与糖尿病风险呈正相关,而锰、铷和铅与糖尿病风险呈负相关。在分层分析的基础上,还观察了糖尿病风险中硒的年龄特异性差异和锰的性别特异性差异。根据RCS分析,我们获得了金属与糖尿病风险之间的剂量-反应关系:(1)血浆铝和硒与糖尿病风险呈倒u型相关,阈值分别接近20.5µg/L和75.9µg/L(总体P和lt P均为P;0.05;P表示非线性<;0.05)。(2)铷和铅与糖尿病风险呈L型相关,转折点分别接近144.5µg/L和2.5µg/L(总体P值和lt P值均为P;0.05;P表示非线性<;0.05)。(3)当锰浓度小于约4.2 μg/L时,锰与糖尿病风险呈线性负相关(P < 0.05);0.05;非线性P = 0.268)。BKMR模型还揭示了金属混合物对糖尿病风险的负联合效应以及六对金属(铝-锰、铝-硒、铝-铷、铝-铅、锰-硒和锰-铷)之间的潜在相互作用。综上所述,我们需要关注低血浆水平铝、硒、锰、铷和铅在糖尿病中的作用,特别是它们的安全窗口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1234
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety is a multi-disciplinary journal that focuses on understanding the exposure and effects of environmental contamination on organisms including human health. The scope of the journal covers three main themes. The topics within these themes, indicated below, include (but are not limited to) the following: Ecotoxicology、Environmental Chemistry、Environmental Safety etc.
期刊最新文献
Multistress in a changing world: Impacts of pollutant mixture and temperature on stress response, endocrine system, and detoxification mechanisms in the freshwater gastropod Physa acuta (Draparnaud, 1805). Acute cadmium exposure induced intestinal barrier damage in the hybrid grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus♂ × Epinephelus lanceolatus♀). PET degradation by Acinetobacter sp. W107 from plastic-polluted Tanggou River, mediated by the key esterase EstZ. Mechanistic investigation of the associations between bacterial community composition and cadmium distribution in Zizania latifolia. Quantitative characterization of LNAPL contaminant concentrations in the vadose zone by integrating environmental factors and interpretable support vector machine models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1