A Pilot Study of the Home-Based 12-Lead Electrocardiogram in Clinical Practice

Levi W. Disrud CCRC, CRAT, CCT , William H. Swain MD , Halley Davison MBA/HCM , Tara Gosse MS, FACHE , Manfred M. Kubler MD , David M. Harmon MD , Paul A. Friedman MD , Peter A. Noseworthy MD , Anthony H. Kashou MD
{"title":"A Pilot Study of the Home-Based 12-Lead Electrocardiogram in Clinical Practice","authors":"Levi W. Disrud CCRC, CRAT, CCT ,&nbsp;William H. Swain MD ,&nbsp;Halley Davison MBA/HCM ,&nbsp;Tara Gosse MS, FACHE ,&nbsp;Manfred M. Kubler MD ,&nbsp;David M. Harmon MD ,&nbsp;Paul A. Friedman MD ,&nbsp;Peter A. Noseworthy MD ,&nbsp;Anthony H. Kashou MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Telehealth consultation with a physician can be an attractive option for eligible patients. In this pilot study, we evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of an FDA approved 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) device, Smeartheart, that can be used remotely in the patients’ home before telehealth appointments with a cardiac electrophysiologist. We scheduled a phone call with 10 patients who used this device as part of their care. Eight patients were able to obtain a diagnostic quality ECG. Telephone call appointments with ECG technicians took a median of 51 minutes, and it took patients an average of 2.2 attempts to record a usable ECG. We also identified barriers to the use of the Smartheart device, including internet accessibility, training material, patient functional status, and motion artifact that may inform more widespread study and utilization of remote-recorded 12-lead ECGs. We conclude that the Smartheart device may have clinical use with remote use in routine clinical care, although the best use of this technology requires further study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"9 2","pages":"Article 100598"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454825000098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Telehealth consultation with a physician can be an attractive option for eligible patients. In this pilot study, we evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of an FDA approved 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) device, Smeartheart, that can be used remotely in the patients’ home before telehealth appointments with a cardiac electrophysiologist. We scheduled a phone call with 10 patients who used this device as part of their care. Eight patients were able to obtain a diagnostic quality ECG. Telephone call appointments with ECG technicians took a median of 51 minutes, and it took patients an average of 2.2 attempts to record a usable ECG. We also identified barriers to the use of the Smartheart device, including internet accessibility, training material, patient functional status, and motion artifact that may inform more widespread study and utilization of remote-recorded 12-lead ECGs. We conclude that the Smartheart device may have clinical use with remote use in routine clinical care, although the best use of this technology requires further study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭12导联心电图在临床应用中的初步研究
对符合条件的患者来说,与医生进行远程医疗咨询是一个有吸引力的选择。在这项试点研究中,我们评估了FDA批准的12导联心电图(ECG)设备smearheart的可行性和效率,该设备可以在与心脏电生理学家进行远程医疗预约之前在患者家中远程使用。我们安排了一次电话会议,邀请了10位在治疗过程中使用这种设备的患者。8例患者能够获得诊断质量的心电图。与心电图技术人员的电话预约平均需要51分钟,患者平均需要尝试2.2次才能记录可用的心电图。我们还确定了使用Smartheart设备的障碍,包括互联网可及性、培训材料、患者功能状态和运动假影,这些障碍可能会为远程记录的12导联心电图的更广泛研究和利用提供信息。我们的结论是,尽管这项技术的最佳使用需要进一步研究,但智能心脏设备可以在临床和常规临床护理中远程使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Code Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Quality Improvement Pilot Study Multifeature Ultrasound-Based Classification for Breast Lesions: A Comparative Study of PONS Image Enhancement Technology Bridging the Gap: Identifying and Overcoming Barriers to CAR-T Access Through Streamlined and Standardized Pathways
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1