echno-economic and environmental evaluation of green hydrogen co-firing in a 570 MWe gas turbine combined cycle power plant in Iraq

Hassan Munther , Qusay Hassan , Aymen Mohammed , Talib Munshid Hanoon , Sameer Algburi
{"title":"echno-economic and environmental evaluation of green hydrogen co-firing in a 570 MWe gas turbine combined cycle power plant in Iraq","authors":"Hassan Munther ,&nbsp;Qusay Hassan ,&nbsp;Aymen Mohammed ,&nbsp;Talib Munshid Hanoon ,&nbsp;Sameer Algburi","doi":"10.1016/j.uncres.2025.100163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study evaluates the interconnections between renewable energy generation, hydrogen production, storage, and the operational demands of hydrogen co-fired gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) power plants for carbon-neutral energy production. Specifically, it assesses the technical, economic, and environmental aspects of producing green hydrogen from hybrid photovoltaic (PV) and wind turbine (WT) sources in Dhi Qar, Iraq. The analysis considers three scenarios with varying hydrogen mole fractions (15 %, 30 %, and 50 %) co-fired with natural gas in a 570 MWe of the GTCC power plant, emitting 1.39 million tonnes of CO<sub>2</sub> annually. Baseline renewable electricity generation capacities for solar PV and wind energy were set at 497.5, 970, and 2200.5 MWp, with hybrid PV/WT systems optimized to supply power to an alkaline water electrolyzer (AWE) with capacities of 180, 425, and 825 MWp, based on hourly weather data from 2023. Multi-objective simulations and optimizations were performed using HOMER Pro and ProSim software to minimize the net present cost (NPC), levelized cost of energy (LCOE), cost of hydrogen (COH), and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Over the proposed 20-year project lifespan (2023–2043), green hydrogen production ranged from 12,082 to 54,442.9 tonnes annually, with a COH between $3.29 and $3.16 per kilogram, demonstrating the economic viability of large-scale hydrogen production. Hydrogen consumption in the GTCC fuel mixture ranged from 10,554.1 to 47,431 tonnes annually, reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 67,864.3 to 310,831.4 tonnes annually. Additionally, natural gas use decreased by 5.22 %–29.1 %, yielding savings of $6.79 to $31.08 million from avoided CO<sub>2</sub> emissions costs. However, despite the environmental and fuel cost benefits, the NPC for the green hydrogen project ranged from $412.9 million to $1.785 billion, and the LCOE for hydrogen co-combustion in the GTCC power plant ranged from $113.54 to $127.74 per MWh, compared to $107.93 per MWh for 100 % natural gas-based power generation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101263,"journal":{"name":"Unconventional Resources","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unconventional Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666519025000299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study evaluates the interconnections between renewable energy generation, hydrogen production, storage, and the operational demands of hydrogen co-fired gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) power plants for carbon-neutral energy production. Specifically, it assesses the technical, economic, and environmental aspects of producing green hydrogen from hybrid photovoltaic (PV) and wind turbine (WT) sources in Dhi Qar, Iraq. The analysis considers three scenarios with varying hydrogen mole fractions (15 %, 30 %, and 50 %) co-fired with natural gas in a 570 MWe of the GTCC power plant, emitting 1.39 million tonnes of CO2 annually. Baseline renewable electricity generation capacities for solar PV and wind energy were set at 497.5, 970, and 2200.5 MWp, with hybrid PV/WT systems optimized to supply power to an alkaline water electrolyzer (AWE) with capacities of 180, 425, and 825 MWp, based on hourly weather data from 2023. Multi-objective simulations and optimizations were performed using HOMER Pro and ProSim software to minimize the net present cost (NPC), levelized cost of energy (LCOE), cost of hydrogen (COH), and CO2 emissions. Over the proposed 20-year project lifespan (2023–2043), green hydrogen production ranged from 12,082 to 54,442.9 tonnes annually, with a COH between $3.29 and $3.16 per kilogram, demonstrating the economic viability of large-scale hydrogen production. Hydrogen consumption in the GTCC fuel mixture ranged from 10,554.1 to 47,431 tonnes annually, reducing CO2 emissions by 67,864.3 to 310,831.4 tonnes annually. Additionally, natural gas use decreased by 5.22 %–29.1 %, yielding savings of $6.79 to $31.08 million from avoided CO2 emissions costs. However, despite the environmental and fuel cost benefits, the NPC for the green hydrogen project ranged from $412.9 million to $1.785 billion, and the LCOE for hydrogen co-combustion in the GTCC power plant ranged from $113.54 to $127.74 per MWh, compared to $107.93 per MWh for 100 % natural gas-based power generation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adopting internet project management to achieve sustainable development goals in the context of energy transition Reimagining research for renewable energy resources solutions: Integrating Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessments for effective global action echno-economic and environmental evaluation of green hydrogen co-firing in a 570 MWe gas turbine combined cycle power plant in Iraq Lithologic characteristics and reservoir evolution of tight sandstones in the upper Triassic Xujiahe formation, northeast Sichuan Basin, China Energy transition as a path to sustainable development in Latin American countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1