The influence of urban and agricultural landscape contexts on forest diversity and structure across ecoregions

IF 2.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70188
John Paul Schmit, Lea R. Johnson, Matthew Baker, Lindsay Darling, Robert Fahey, Dexter H. Locke, Anita T. Morzillo, Nancy F. Sonti, Tara L. E. Trammell, Myla F. J. Aronson, Michelle L. Johnson
{"title":"The influence of urban and agricultural landscape contexts on forest diversity and structure across ecoregions","authors":"John Paul Schmit,&nbsp;Lea R. Johnson,&nbsp;Matthew Baker,&nbsp;Lindsay Darling,&nbsp;Robert Fahey,&nbsp;Dexter H. Locke,&nbsp;Anita T. Morzillo,&nbsp;Nancy F. Sonti,&nbsp;Tara L. E. Trammell,&nbsp;Myla F. J. Aronson,&nbsp;Michelle L. Johnson","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forest patches in urban landscapes make outsized contributions to biodiversity, ecosystem function, and human health and well-being. However, urbanization can alter environmental conditions that underpin forest health. Most studies of forest health in urban landscapes have focused on few forest patches across a single metropolitan region, and synthesis is needed to understand broader patterns. We assessed variation among measures of forest health across land cover gradients and ecoregions by determining (1) whether the degree of urban, agricultural, and forested land surrounding a forest patch was reflected in differences in tree community composition, diversity, and structure and (2) whether these differences were consistent across ecoregions. We synthesized data from 17 observational studies (3334 plots) and remotely sensed land cover (1-km buffer) across four metropolitan regions (Baltimore–Washington DC, Chicago, New York City, and Philadelphia) spanning five ecoregions of the eastern deciduous forest of North America. Land cover surrounding forest patches differed among ecoregions, and forests were surrounded by heterogeneous land cover even in the most urbanized areas. Patterns of tree species composition and forest structure reflected landscape context. Forest patches surrounded by high canopy cover had greater or equal tree species diversity, density, basal area, and diversity of tree sizes relative to patches surrounded by highly agricultural or highly impervious landscapes. In contrast, there was little difference in structure and diversity between forests in highly agricultural and impervious settings. Tree species composition varied among ecoregions, yet tree community assemblages of forests in intensively urbanized areas were consistently distinct from those of forests in other contexts. Forest patches in the most urban and most agricultural landscapes shared predominantly native species communities and were characterized by low tree species diversity, basal area, and size class diversity, as well as high non-native tree abundance, highlighting commonalities among these intensive anthropogenic landscapes. These results point to both common challenges to forest health and common opportunities for forest stewardship in urban and agricultural landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70188","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70188","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest patches in urban landscapes make outsized contributions to biodiversity, ecosystem function, and human health and well-being. However, urbanization can alter environmental conditions that underpin forest health. Most studies of forest health in urban landscapes have focused on few forest patches across a single metropolitan region, and synthesis is needed to understand broader patterns. We assessed variation among measures of forest health across land cover gradients and ecoregions by determining (1) whether the degree of urban, agricultural, and forested land surrounding a forest patch was reflected in differences in tree community composition, diversity, and structure and (2) whether these differences were consistent across ecoregions. We synthesized data from 17 observational studies (3334 plots) and remotely sensed land cover (1-km buffer) across four metropolitan regions (Baltimore–Washington DC, Chicago, New York City, and Philadelphia) spanning five ecoregions of the eastern deciduous forest of North America. Land cover surrounding forest patches differed among ecoregions, and forests were surrounded by heterogeneous land cover even in the most urbanized areas. Patterns of tree species composition and forest structure reflected landscape context. Forest patches surrounded by high canopy cover had greater or equal tree species diversity, density, basal area, and diversity of tree sizes relative to patches surrounded by highly agricultural or highly impervious landscapes. In contrast, there was little difference in structure and diversity between forests in highly agricultural and impervious settings. Tree species composition varied among ecoregions, yet tree community assemblages of forests in intensively urbanized areas were consistently distinct from those of forests in other contexts. Forest patches in the most urban and most agricultural landscapes shared predominantly native species communities and were characterized by low tree species diversity, basal area, and size class diversity, as well as high non-native tree abundance, highlighting commonalities among these intensive anthropogenic landscapes. These results point to both common challenges to forest health and common opportunities for forest stewardship in urban and agricultural landscapes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市和农业景观背景对生态区域森林多样性和结构的影响
城市景观中的森林斑块对生物多样性、生态系统功能以及人类健康和福祉做出了巨大贡献。然而,城市化可以改变支撑森林健康的环境条件。大多数关于城市景观中森林健康的研究都集中在单个大都市区的少数森林斑块上,需要综合研究以了解更广泛的模式。我们通过确定(1)森林斑块周围的城市、农业和林地的程度是否反映在树木群落组成、多样性和结构的差异上,以及(2)这些差异在不同的生态区内是否一致,评估了不同土地覆盖梯度和生态区内森林健康指标之间的差异。我们综合了来自17个观测研究(3334个样地)的数据和遥感土地覆盖(1公里缓冲),这些数据来自四个大都市区(巴尔的摩-华盛顿特区、芝加哥、纽约市和费城),横跨北美东部落叶林的五个生态区。不同生态区森林斑块周围的土地覆盖存在差异,即使在城市化程度最高的地区,森林周围的土地覆盖也存在异质性。树种组成和森林结构的格局反映了景观文脉。相对于高度农业或高度不透水景观的斑块,高冠层覆盖的森林斑块具有更高或相同的树种多样性、密度、基面积和乔木大小多样性。相比之下,在高度农业和不透水环境中,森林的结构和多样性几乎没有差别。不同生态区域的树种组成各不相同,但密集城市化地区森林的树木群落组合始终不同于其他环境下的森林。大多数城市和农业景观的森林斑块以本地物种群落为主,树种多样性、基面积和大小类多样性低,而非本地树木丰度高,突出了这些密集人为景观之间的共性。这些结果既指出了森林健康面临的共同挑战,也指出了城市和农业景观中森林管理的共同机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
期刊最新文献
Relative pollen productivity estimates from India: A step towards quantitative reconstruction of past plant abundance The influence of environmental conditions on the selection of spring migration routes by caribou Carduus nutans and Carduus acanthoides, two invasive thistle species, strongly rebound from disturbances Early life exposure to the antibiotic tetracycline alters in-hive development of the adult honey bee gut microbiome Research on the spatiotemporal dynamics and the recreation spatial equity of China's nature reserves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1