Amendments and seeding did not augment erosion control structure effectiveness in dry rangelands

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70105
Eva Stricker, Megan O'Connell
{"title":"Amendments and seeding did not augment erosion control structure effectiveness in dry rangelands","authors":"Eva Stricker,&nbsp;Megan O'Connell","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rangelands in the Western United States are crucial for providing ecosystem services and supporting rural food systems, but they face increased degradation from erosion. Existing erosion management activities leverage physical interventions such as rock structures, but little is known as to whether biological interventions such as seeding or organic amendments may enhance soil health and augment the effects of such rock structures. This study investigates the effectiveness of combining rock structures with organic amendments (wood mulch or compost) and native perennial grass seed addition to address erosion on rangelands. The study was conducted across five cattle ranches in New Mexico with 9–18 active head cuts studied at each ranch. Rock rundown structures were built at each headcut and a plot above each structure received an organic amendment treatment (compost, mulch, or control) and seed addition treatment (seeded or control). Across sites, we found none of the seed additions resulted in plant establishment; therefore, we aggregated all seed addition treatments and focused only on organic amendments and measured soil and vegetation characteristics after one year. Consistently, the rock structures themselves led to channel accretion, but organic amendments had no significant effect on infiltration rate, aggregate stability, channel erosion/accretion, aboveground biomass, vegetation cover, plant richness, or soil organic carbon. Our results indicate that rock structures are an effective solution for addressing small headcuts on arid rangelands but organic amendments and native seed addition were not effective on this time scale, potentially due to severe drought during much of the year in the region. Ranchers and field technicians noted trends of enhanced soil moisture in the amendments compared with controls and were thus interested in pursuing further investigation in amendments in the future, despite the lack of effect in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rangelands in the Western United States are crucial for providing ecosystem services and supporting rural food systems, but they face increased degradation from erosion. Existing erosion management activities leverage physical interventions such as rock structures, but little is known as to whether biological interventions such as seeding or organic amendments may enhance soil health and augment the effects of such rock structures. This study investigates the effectiveness of combining rock structures with organic amendments (wood mulch or compost) and native perennial grass seed addition to address erosion on rangelands. The study was conducted across five cattle ranches in New Mexico with 9–18 active head cuts studied at each ranch. Rock rundown structures were built at each headcut and a plot above each structure received an organic amendment treatment (compost, mulch, or control) and seed addition treatment (seeded or control). Across sites, we found none of the seed additions resulted in plant establishment; therefore, we aggregated all seed addition treatments and focused only on organic amendments and measured soil and vegetation characteristics after one year. Consistently, the rock structures themselves led to channel accretion, but organic amendments had no significant effect on infiltration rate, aggregate stability, channel erosion/accretion, aboveground biomass, vegetation cover, plant richness, or soil organic carbon. Our results indicate that rock structures are an effective solution for addressing small headcuts on arid rangelands but organic amendments and native seed addition were not effective on this time scale, potentially due to severe drought during much of the year in the region. Ranchers and field technicians noted trends of enhanced soil moisture in the amendments compared with controls and were thus interested in pursuing further investigation in amendments in the future, despite the lack of effect in this study.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
期刊最新文献
Elevated CO2 and drought modify plant–plant and plant–mycorrhizal interactions in two codominant grasses Amendments and seeding did not augment erosion control structure effectiveness in dry rangelands Historical fire regimes in whitebark pine ecosystems of west-central British Columbia Cover Image Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1