Seyfi Özdemir, P. Dilara Kecici, Hulya Yalcintan, Bulent Ekiz
{"title":"Behaviors in the Slaughter Corridor, Carcass, and Meat Quality Traits of Anatolian, Italian, and Italian × Anatolian Crossbreds (F1) Water Buffaloes","authors":"Seyfi Özdemir, P. Dilara Kecici, Hulya Yalcintan, Bulent Ekiz","doi":"10.1111/asj.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to assess the slaughter corridor behavior, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of Anatolian, Italian, and Italian × Anatolian (F<sub>1</sub>) crossbred water buffaloes. The research involved Anatolian (<i>n</i> = 8), Italian (<i>n</i> = 10), and Italian × Anatolian crossbred (<i>n</i> = 8) water buffaloes, all of which had been used for milk production on a commercial farm before being culled and slaughtered. While water buffalo pass through the slaughter corridor, both the behaviors of the animals and the handling actions of the stockpersons were video recorded. Genotype had no significant influence on the scores for animal behaviors (AWBEH) and stockperson actions (AWACT). There were significant differences in carcass weight among the genotypes (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with the genotypes ranked from smallest to largest in carcass weight as follows: Anatolian, crossbred (F<sub>1</sub>), and Italian water buffaloes. Additionally, the EUROP fatness score was higher in carcasses from the Italian genotype compared to the Anatolian water buffaloes. Mean pH<sub>24h</sub> was lower in Italian water buffaloes than Anatolian ones. On the other hand, fat and meat color variables were not influenced by animal genotype. In conclusion, crossbreeding between Italian and Anatolian water buffaloes may increase carcass weight in crossbred (F<sub>1</sub>) genotype without altering meat quality or temperament.</p>","PeriodicalId":7890,"journal":{"name":"Animal Science Journal","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asj.70042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asj.70042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the slaughter corridor behavior, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of Anatolian, Italian, and Italian × Anatolian (F1) crossbred water buffaloes. The research involved Anatolian (n = 8), Italian (n = 10), and Italian × Anatolian crossbred (n = 8) water buffaloes, all of which had been used for milk production on a commercial farm before being culled and slaughtered. While water buffalo pass through the slaughter corridor, both the behaviors of the animals and the handling actions of the stockpersons were video recorded. Genotype had no significant influence on the scores for animal behaviors (AWBEH) and stockperson actions (AWACT). There were significant differences in carcass weight among the genotypes (p < 0.001), with the genotypes ranked from smallest to largest in carcass weight as follows: Anatolian, crossbred (F1), and Italian water buffaloes. Additionally, the EUROP fatness score was higher in carcasses from the Italian genotype compared to the Anatolian water buffaloes. Mean pH24h was lower in Italian water buffaloes than Anatolian ones. On the other hand, fat and meat color variables were not influenced by animal genotype. In conclusion, crossbreeding between Italian and Anatolian water buffaloes may increase carcass weight in crossbred (F1) genotype without altering meat quality or temperament.
期刊介绍:
Animal Science Journal (a continuation of Animal Science and Technology) is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Animal Science (JSAS) and publishes Original Research Articles (full papers and rapid communications) in English in all fields of animal and poultry science: genetics and breeding, genetic engineering, reproduction, embryo manipulation, nutrition, feeds and feeding, physiology, anatomy, environment and behavior, animal products (milk, meat, eggs and their by-products) and their processing, and livestock economics. Animal Science Journal will invite Review Articles in consultations with Editors. Submission to the Journal is open to those who are interested in animal science.