{"title":"When and How Autonomy Benefits the Impact of Prosocial Behaviour on Well-Being","authors":"Yunxiang Chen","doi":"10.1002/ijop.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Prosocial behaviour consistently correlates positively with individual well-being. However, the specific role of autonomy, a basic psychological need in self-determination theory, remains debated. To address this debate and fill theoretical and methodological gaps, this study takes a cross-cultural approach and examines the moderating and mediating effects of autonomy on the relationship between prosocial behaviour and well-being. The study utilises data from the extensive World Values Survey (<i>N</i> = 76,897 from 51 countries or territories). Results indicate a positive correlation between prosocial behaviour and well-being, with autonomy moderating this relationship. Notably, individuals with lower autonomy experience greater well-being benefits than those with higher autonomy. Additionally, autonomy partially mediates the positive relationship between prosocial behaviour and well-being. Upon simultaneous exploration of the dual roles of autonomy, both its mediating and interactive functions in the relationship between prosocial behaviour and well-being were identified. These findings shed light on the intricate dynamics of autonomy in the relationship between prosocial behaviour and well-being. The study concludes by discussing interpretations, implications, and avenues for future research.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prosocial behaviour consistently correlates positively with individual well-being. However, the specific role of autonomy, a basic psychological need in self-determination theory, remains debated. To address this debate and fill theoretical and methodological gaps, this study takes a cross-cultural approach and examines the moderating and mediating effects of autonomy on the relationship between prosocial behaviour and well-being. The study utilises data from the extensive World Values Survey (N = 76,897 from 51 countries or territories). Results indicate a positive correlation between prosocial behaviour and well-being, with autonomy moderating this relationship. Notably, individuals with lower autonomy experience greater well-being benefits than those with higher autonomy. Additionally, autonomy partially mediates the positive relationship between prosocial behaviour and well-being. Upon simultaneous exploration of the dual roles of autonomy, both its mediating and interactive functions in the relationship between prosocial behaviour and well-being were identified. These findings shed light on the intricate dynamics of autonomy in the relationship between prosocial behaviour and well-being. The study concludes by discussing interpretations, implications, and avenues for future research.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Psychology (IJP) is the journal of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) and is published under the auspices of the Union. IJP seeks to support the IUPsyS in fostering the development of international psychological science. It aims to strengthen the dialog within psychology around the world and to facilitate communication among different areas of psychology and among psychologists from different cultural backgrounds. IJP is the outlet for empirical basic and applied studies and for reviews that either (a) incorporate perspectives from different areas or domains within psychology or across different disciplines, (b) test the culture-dependent validity of psychological theories, or (c) integrate literature from different regions in the world.