{"title":"Online Moral Conformity Revisited","authors":"Alexandr A. Fedorov, Anastasiya A. Steshova","doi":"10.1002/ijop.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article presents a divergent replication of a recent study exploring the phenomenon of moral conformity in online video interactions. The replication introduced intentional variations, such as a different cultural context—specifically, Russian—and varied stimulus materials to examine the cross-cultural stability and consistency of the observed moral conformity effect. The research utilised a well-established Asch conformity paradigm and encompassed 15 moral situations, including trolley-type, factual and Haidt's moral scenarios. The study recruited a total of 104 participants, aged 18–28, comprising 68 females and 36 males. In the experimental condition, participants confronted moral dilemmas in the presence of confederates via the online video meeting service, while participants in the control condition made decisions alone. The results revealed significant differences between experimental and control conditions for both consequentialist and deontological pressure, as well as for the overall conformity level, affirming the robustness of the moral conformity effect across cultural contexts. No significant difference was observed between trolley-type and factual dilemmas. These findings suggest that moral conformity is a stable behavioural phenomenon that transcends cultural boundaries, highlighting its relevance for understanding moral behaviour in online interactions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.70033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article presents a divergent replication of a recent study exploring the phenomenon of moral conformity in online video interactions. The replication introduced intentional variations, such as a different cultural context—specifically, Russian—and varied stimulus materials to examine the cross-cultural stability and consistency of the observed moral conformity effect. The research utilised a well-established Asch conformity paradigm and encompassed 15 moral situations, including trolley-type, factual and Haidt's moral scenarios. The study recruited a total of 104 participants, aged 18–28, comprising 68 females and 36 males. In the experimental condition, participants confronted moral dilemmas in the presence of confederates via the online video meeting service, while participants in the control condition made decisions alone. The results revealed significant differences between experimental and control conditions for both consequentialist and deontological pressure, as well as for the overall conformity level, affirming the robustness of the moral conformity effect across cultural contexts. No significant difference was observed between trolley-type and factual dilemmas. These findings suggest that moral conformity is a stable behavioural phenomenon that transcends cultural boundaries, highlighting its relevance for understanding moral behaviour in online interactions.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Psychology (IJP) is the journal of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) and is published under the auspices of the Union. IJP seeks to support the IUPsyS in fostering the development of international psychological science. It aims to strengthen the dialog within psychology around the world and to facilitate communication among different areas of psychology and among psychologists from different cultural backgrounds. IJP is the outlet for empirical basic and applied studies and for reviews that either (a) incorporate perspectives from different areas or domains within psychology or across different disciplines, (b) test the culture-dependent validity of psychological theories, or (c) integrate literature from different regions in the world.