Online Moral Conformity Revisited

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1002/ijop.70033
Alexandr A. Fedorov, Anastasiya A. Steshova
{"title":"Online Moral Conformity Revisited","authors":"Alexandr A. Fedorov,&nbsp;Anastasiya A. Steshova","doi":"10.1002/ijop.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article presents a divergent replication of a recent study exploring the phenomenon of moral conformity in online video interactions. The replication introduced intentional variations, such as a different cultural context—specifically, Russian—and varied stimulus materials to examine the cross-cultural stability and consistency of the observed moral conformity effect. The research utilised a well-established Asch conformity paradigm and encompassed 15 moral situations, including trolley-type, factual and Haidt's moral scenarios. The study recruited a total of 104 participants, aged 18–28, comprising 68 females and 36 males. In the experimental condition, participants confronted moral dilemmas in the presence of confederates via the online video meeting service, while participants in the control condition made decisions alone. The results revealed significant differences between experimental and control conditions for both consequentialist and deontological pressure, as well as for the overall conformity level, affirming the robustness of the moral conformity effect across cultural contexts. No significant difference was observed between trolley-type and factual dilemmas. These findings suggest that moral conformity is a stable behavioural phenomenon that transcends cultural boundaries, highlighting its relevance for understanding moral behaviour in online interactions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.70033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a divergent replication of a recent study exploring the phenomenon of moral conformity in online video interactions. The replication introduced intentional variations, such as a different cultural context—specifically, Russian—and varied stimulus materials to examine the cross-cultural stability and consistency of the observed moral conformity effect. The research utilised a well-established Asch conformity paradigm and encompassed 15 moral situations, including trolley-type, factual and Haidt's moral scenarios. The study recruited a total of 104 participants, aged 18–28, comprising 68 females and 36 males. In the experimental condition, participants confronted moral dilemmas in the presence of confederates via the online video meeting service, while participants in the control condition made decisions alone. The results revealed significant differences between experimental and control conditions for both consequentialist and deontological pressure, as well as for the overall conformity level, affirming the robustness of the moral conformity effect across cultural contexts. No significant difference was observed between trolley-type and factual dilemmas. These findings suggest that moral conformity is a stable behavioural phenomenon that transcends cultural boundaries, highlighting its relevance for understanding moral behaviour in online interactions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视网络道德规范
这篇文章提出了对最近一项研究的不同复制,该研究探索了在线视频互动中的道德从众现象。复制引入了有意的变化,如不同的文化背景,特别是俄罗斯和不同的刺激材料,以检验观察到的道德从规性效应的跨文化稳定性和一致性。该研究采用了一个完善的Asch从众范式,包括15种道德情境,包括电车型、事实型和Haidt的道德情境。该研究共招募了104名参与者,年龄在18-28岁之间,其中68名女性和36名男性。在实验条件下,参与者通过在线视频会议服务在同盟者在场的情况下面对道德困境,而在控制条件下,参与者单独做出决定。结果显示,结果主义压力和义务论压力以及整体从众水平在实验条件和控制条件之间存在显著差异,证实了道德从众效应在不同文化背景下的稳健性。有轨电车型困境与事实型困境之间无显著差异。这些发现表明,道德从众是一种超越文化界限的稳定行为现象,强调了其与理解在线互动中的道德行为的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychology
International Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychology (IJP) is the journal of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) and is published under the auspices of the Union. IJP seeks to support the IUPsyS in fostering the development of international psychological science. It aims to strengthen the dialog within psychology around the world and to facilitate communication among different areas of psychology and among psychologists from different cultural backgrounds. IJP is the outlet for empirical basic and applied studies and for reviews that either (a) incorporate perspectives from different areas or domains within psychology or across different disciplines, (b) test the culture-dependent validity of psychological theories, or (c) integrate literature from different regions in the world.
期刊最新文献
Justice Beliefs in German Parliamentarians and Citizens. Reciprocal Relations Between Honesty-Humility and Internal Locus of Control Specific to Well-Being: A Four-Wave Longitudinal Study. The Foreign Language Effect on Victim Blaming: The Moderating Role of the Belief in a Just World. Network Analysis of Parental Responses to Children's Negative Emotions and Adolescents' Socioemotional Development. Music Therapy and Art Therapy in the Treatment of Patients With Mental Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1