Rademikibart Treatment for Moderate-to-Severe Uncontrolled Asthma: A Phase 2B Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 21.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1164/rccm.202409-1708OC
Edward Kerwin, Ting Yang, Nan Su, Jiawang Guo, Radha Adivikolanu, Malinda Longphre, Junying Wang, Jili Yun, Wuban Pan, Zheng Wei, Raúl Collazo
{"title":"Rademikibart Treatment for Moderate-to-Severe Uncontrolled Asthma: A Phase 2B Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Edward Kerwin, Ting Yang, Nan Su, Jiawang Guo, Radha Adivikolanu, Malinda Longphre, Junying Wang, Jili Yun, Wuban Pan, Zheng Wei, Raúl Collazo","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202409-1708OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Rademikibart (formerly CBP-201) is an IL-4Rα-targeting antibody. <b>Objectives:</b> We sought to evaluate rademikibart in adults with moderate-to-severe, persistent, uncontrolled asthma. <b>Methods:</b> In this global Phase 2b trial, 322 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to two rademikibart groups (150 mg or 300 mg every other week, after a 600-mg loading dose) or a placebo group; rademikibart or placebo was administered subcutaneously for 24 weeks. <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> Prebronchodilator (trough) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV<sub>1</sub>) at Week 12 (primary endpoint) improved with rademikibart at 150 mg and 300 mg: Least squares mean changes (95% confidence interval), above placebo, were 140 ml (44-236 ml; <i>P</i> = 0.005) and 189 ml (92-286 ml; <i>P</i> < 0.001), respectively. Prebronchodilator (trough) FEV<sub>1</sub> improvements occurred rapidly during Week 1, were sustained through Week 24, and were greatest in patients with high baseline blood eosinophils (patients with ⩾300 eosinophils/ml experienced placebo-adjusted FEV<sub>1</sub> improvement at Week 24 of 420 ml [95% confidence interval =  239-600 ml] in the 300-mg group). Rapid and sustained statistically significant improvements were also observed in percent predicted FEV<sub>1</sub> and Asthma Control Questionnaire score across 24 weeks. Through Week 24, proportions of patients with one or more exacerbations were 7.5% (150 mg) and 9.3% (300 mg) versus 16.7% (placebo). Eighty-eight percent of patients completed treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events were generally similar to placebo, and no eosinophilia was observed. Injection site reactions were mostly mild. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (10-12% of patients) were cough, coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and dyspnea. <b>Conclusions:</b> Rapid and sustained improvements in lung function and asthma control were gained across 24 weeks of rademikibart therapy. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04773678).</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":"749-758"},"PeriodicalIF":21.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12091008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202409-1708OC","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Rademikibart (formerly CBP-201) is an IL-4Rα-targeting antibody. Objectives: We sought to evaluate rademikibart in adults with moderate-to-severe, persistent, uncontrolled asthma. Methods: In this global Phase 2b trial, 322 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to two rademikibart groups (150 mg or 300 mg every other week, after a 600-mg loading dose) or a placebo group; rademikibart or placebo was administered subcutaneously for 24 weeks. Measurements and Main Results: Prebronchodilator (trough) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at Week 12 (primary endpoint) improved with rademikibart at 150 mg and 300 mg: Least squares mean changes (95% confidence interval), above placebo, were 140 ml (44-236 ml; P = 0.005) and 189 ml (92-286 ml; P < 0.001), respectively. Prebronchodilator (trough) FEV1 improvements occurred rapidly during Week 1, were sustained through Week 24, and were greatest in patients with high baseline blood eosinophils (patients with ⩾300 eosinophils/ml experienced placebo-adjusted FEV1 improvement at Week 24 of 420 ml [95% confidence interval =  239-600 ml] in the 300-mg group). Rapid and sustained statistically significant improvements were also observed in percent predicted FEV1 and Asthma Control Questionnaire score across 24 weeks. Through Week 24, proportions of patients with one or more exacerbations were 7.5% (150 mg) and 9.3% (300 mg) versus 16.7% (placebo). Eighty-eight percent of patients completed treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events were generally similar to placebo, and no eosinophilia was observed. Injection site reactions were mostly mild. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (10-12% of patients) were cough, coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and dyspnea. Conclusions: Rapid and sustained improvements in lung function and asthma control were gained across 24 weeks of rademikibart therapy. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04773678).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rademikibart治疗中重度、未控制哮喘:一项2B期随机试验
原理:Rademikibart(原CBP-201)是一种靶向il - 4r α的抗体。目的:评估rademikibart对中度至重度、持续性、不受控制的成人哮喘的治疗效果。方法:在这项全球2b期试验(NCT04773678)中,322名患者以1:1:1的比例随机分配到两个rademikibart组(150 mg或300 mg每隔一周,在600 mg负荷剂量之后)或安慰剂组,皮下注射,持续24周。测量和主要结果:第12周(主要终点),rademikibart 150 mg和300 mg改善了支气管扩张剂(槽)呼气前第一秒的用力呼气量(FEV1):最小二乘平均变化(95% CI),高于安慰剂,为+140 mL (+44-236 mL;p=0.005)和+189 mL (+92 ~ 286 mL;p1的改善在第1周迅速发生,并持续到第24周,并且在基线血嗜酸性粒细胞高的患者中效果最好(嗜酸性粒细胞≥300 /mL的患者在300 mg组的第24周+420 mL时经历了安慰剂调整的FEV1改善[95% CI, +239-600 mL])。在24周内,预测FEV1和哮喘控制问卷评分的百分比也观察到快速和持续的统计学显著改善。到第24周,≥1次加重的患者比例分别为7.5% (150 mg)和9.3% (300 mg),而安慰剂组为16.7%。88%的患者完成了治疗。治疗后出现的不良事件(teae)总体上与安慰剂相似,未观察到嗜酸性粒细胞增多。注射部位反应大多轻微。最常见的teae(10-12%的患者)是咳嗽、COVID-19和呼吸困难。结论:在24周的rademikibart治疗中,肺功能和哮喘控制得到了快速和持续的改善。临床试验注册可在www.Clinicaltrials: gov, ID: NCT04773678。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
1313
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences. A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.
期刊最新文献
The Gut Speaks to the Lung: Fecal Microbiota and Survival in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Decoding the Granuloma-Fibrosis Axis in Cardiac Sarcoidosis. Coal Workers' Pneumoconiosis in the United States 1974-2025: Prevalence in Central Appalachia Continues to Increase. Unusual Presentation of Primary Pulmonary Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma as Soft Tissue Density Shadows in Both Hilar Regions. Targeted Lung Denervation in COPD: The Need to Address Comorbid Contributors to Dyspnea.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1