Idunn S Morris, Thiago Bassi, Catherine A Bellissimo, Paweenuch Bootjeamjai, Georgiana Roman-Sarita, Marc de Perrot, Laura Donahoe, Karen McRae, Jose Dianti, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Shaf Keshavjee, Marcelo Cypel, Steven C Reynolds, Martin Dres, Viral Thakkar, Nawzer Mehta, Laurent Brochard, Niall D Ferguson, Ewan C Goligher
{"title":"Continuous On-Demand Diaphragm Neurostimulation to Prevent Diaphragm Inactivity During Mechanical Ventilation: A Phase 1 Clinical Trial (STIMULUS).","authors":"Idunn S Morris, Thiago Bassi, Catherine A Bellissimo, Paweenuch Bootjeamjai, Georgiana Roman-Sarita, Marc de Perrot, Laura Donahoe, Karen McRae, Jose Dianti, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Shaf Keshavjee, Marcelo Cypel, Steven C Reynolds, Martin Dres, Viral Thakkar, Nawzer Mehta, Laurent Brochard, Niall D Ferguson, Ewan C Goligher","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202407-1483OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Diaphragm inactivity during invasive mechanical ventilation may predispose the lung and diaphragm to injury, and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess the feasibility of continuous on-demand diaphragm neurostimulation-assisted mechanical ventilation to maintain diaphragm activity in the absence of respiratory drive for at least 24 hours of mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single center phase 1 clinical trial, patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure or after thoracic surgery underwent transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation delivered in synchrony with mechanical ventilation. Diaphragm neurostimulation was delivered when breaths were initiated by the ventilator and not by the patient until a successful spontaneous breathing trial was performed or for up to seven days. The co-primary outcomes were safety and feasibility of maintaining diaphragm activity over the first 24 hours of intervention.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Twenty participants were enrolled and 19 underwent study procedures. Diaphragm neurostimulation was successfully initiated in all 19 patients (100%) and on-target diaphragm activity was maintained for ≥50% of hours of passive mechanical ventilation over the initial 24-hour period in 18/19 (95%) patients. Diaphragm neurostimulation was well-tolerated; one pneumothorax unrelated to device occurred following subclavian catheter placement prior to surgery. Over the 7-day study period, diaphragm activity was maintained during a median of 100% (IQR 95-100%) hours with absent respiratory drive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous on-demand diaphragm neurostimulation-assisted mechanical ventilation is feasible and can prevent diaphragm inactivity during mechanical ventilation. Clinical trial registration available at www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov, ID: NCT05465083.</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202407-1483OC","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale: Diaphragm inactivity during invasive mechanical ventilation may predispose the lung and diaphragm to injury, and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes.
Objectives: Assess the feasibility of continuous on-demand diaphragm neurostimulation-assisted mechanical ventilation to maintain diaphragm activity in the absence of respiratory drive for at least 24 hours of mechanical ventilation.
Methods: In a single center phase 1 clinical trial, patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure or after thoracic surgery underwent transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation delivered in synchrony with mechanical ventilation. Diaphragm neurostimulation was delivered when breaths were initiated by the ventilator and not by the patient until a successful spontaneous breathing trial was performed or for up to seven days. The co-primary outcomes were safety and feasibility of maintaining diaphragm activity over the first 24 hours of intervention.
Measurements and main results: Twenty participants were enrolled and 19 underwent study procedures. Diaphragm neurostimulation was successfully initiated in all 19 patients (100%) and on-target diaphragm activity was maintained for ≥50% of hours of passive mechanical ventilation over the initial 24-hour period in 18/19 (95%) patients. Diaphragm neurostimulation was well-tolerated; one pneumothorax unrelated to device occurred following subclavian catheter placement prior to surgery. Over the 7-day study period, diaphragm activity was maintained during a median of 100% (IQR 95-100%) hours with absent respiratory drive.
Conclusions: Continuous on-demand diaphragm neurostimulation-assisted mechanical ventilation is feasible and can prevent diaphragm inactivity during mechanical ventilation. Clinical trial registration available at www.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences.
A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.