Quantitative Evaluation of Debris Removal from NiTi Rotary Endodontic Instruments After Different Cleaning Procedures.

IF 3.1 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dentistry Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.3390/dj13020049
Luigi Generali, Paolo Generali, Pio Bertani, Francesco Cavani, Vittorio Checchi, Tommaso Filippini, Federica Veneri
{"title":"Quantitative Evaluation of Debris Removal from NiTi Rotary Endodontic Instruments After Different Cleaning Procedures.","authors":"Luigi Generali, Paolo Generali, Pio Bertani, Francesco Cavani, Vittorio Checchi, Tommaso Filippini, Federica Veneri","doi":"10.3390/dj13020049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Endodontic instruments require thorough decontamination and sterilization before use and reuse to ensure the safety and success of treatments. However, standardized protocols are lacking. This study aimed to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of different cleaning protocols in removing debris from NiTi rotary file surfaces. <b>Methods:</b> Forty-eight new Mtwo NiTi rotary instruments (sizes 10/.04, 15/.05, 20/.06, and 25/.06) were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 12). A set of new sterile instruments (Group I) served as the negative control. After usage for primary endodontic treatment, instruments underwent different cleaning protocols: steam sterilization without cleaning (Group II); ultrasonic cleaning + steam sterilization (Group III); and manual cleaning with a scouring sponge + ultrasonic cleaning + steam sterilization (Group IV). Back-scattered scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of the apical, middle, and coronal sections were processed using Fiji software (version 2.14.0) to quantify debris as a percentage of the total selected area. <b>Results:</b> No significant differences were found among the three sections within each group, although higher debris amounts were observed from coronal to apical in Groups I and II. Group I had the least debris, while Group II showed the most, with statistically significant differences compared to other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was no significant difference between Groups III and IV, though Group IV showed notably less debris. <b>Conclusions:</b> The combination of mechanical, chemical, and ultrasonic cleaning proved most effective at removing debris from endodontic instruments. Current cleaning methods, however, remain insufficient for complete debris removal, highlighting the need for further research to standardize and improve cleaning and sterilization protocols or preferably use single-use/single-patient instruments.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13020049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Endodontic instruments require thorough decontamination and sterilization before use and reuse to ensure the safety and success of treatments. However, standardized protocols are lacking. This study aimed to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of different cleaning protocols in removing debris from NiTi rotary file surfaces. Methods: Forty-eight new Mtwo NiTi rotary instruments (sizes 10/.04, 15/.05, 20/.06, and 25/.06) were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 12). A set of new sterile instruments (Group I) served as the negative control. After usage for primary endodontic treatment, instruments underwent different cleaning protocols: steam sterilization without cleaning (Group II); ultrasonic cleaning + steam sterilization (Group III); and manual cleaning with a scouring sponge + ultrasonic cleaning + steam sterilization (Group IV). Back-scattered scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of the apical, middle, and coronal sections were processed using Fiji software (version 2.14.0) to quantify debris as a percentage of the total selected area. Results: No significant differences were found among the three sections within each group, although higher debris amounts were observed from coronal to apical in Groups I and II. Group I had the least debris, while Group II showed the most, with statistically significant differences compared to other groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between Groups III and IV, though Group IV showed notably less debris. Conclusions: The combination of mechanical, chemical, and ultrasonic cleaning proved most effective at removing debris from endodontic instruments. Current cleaning methods, however, remain insufficient for complete debris removal, highlighting the need for further research to standardize and improve cleaning and sterilization protocols or preferably use single-use/single-patient instruments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同清洁方法对NiTi旋转根管器械碎片去除的定量评价。
目的:根管器械在使用和重复使用前需要进行彻底的净化和消毒,以确保治疗的安全和成功。然而,缺乏标准化的协议。本研究旨在定量评估不同清洁方案在去除镍钛旋转锉表面碎屑方面的有效性。方法:48台新型Mtwo NiTi旋转仪器(尺寸为10/。04, 15 /。05年,20 /。6例,25例/.06)随机分为4组(n = 12)。阴性对照为新型无菌器械1套(组1)。用于初级根管治疗后,器械进行不同的清洗方案:蒸汽灭菌不清洗(第二组);超声波清洗+蒸汽灭菌(III组);用洗净海绵手工清洗+超声清洗+蒸汽灭菌(IV组)。使用Fiji软件(2.14.0版本)处理顶端、中间和冠状切片的背散射扫描电子显微镜(SEM)显微照片,以量化碎片占选定总面积的百分比。结果:各组内3个切片间无显著差异,但ⅰ组和ⅱ组从冠状到根尖的碎片量较高。I组碎片最少,II组碎片最多,与其他组比较差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。第三组和第四组之间没有显著差异,尽管第四组的碎片明显较少。结论:机械清洗、化学清洗和超声清洗对清除根管器械碎片最有效。然而,目前的清洁方法仍然不足以完全清除碎片,因此需要进一步研究以标准化和改进清洁和灭菌方案,或最好使用一次性/单个患者的器械。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Dental Adhesion Protocol: A Clinically Oriented Literature Review with Practical Guidelines. Dental Amalgam and Oral Biological Responses: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence. Three-Dimensional Displacement Patterns in Maxillary Molar Distalization: A Comparative Finite Element Study. Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Dental Implants Placed and Restored by AEGD Residents: Up to 10-Year Retrospective Study. Partial Ceramic Veneers as a Conservative Restorative Strategy: A Narrative Review with Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1