Invasive Physiological Assessment of Lower Limb Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Narrative Review.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.3390/jcdd12020077
Sarosh Khan, Samer Fawaz, Uzma Sajjad, Christopher Cook, Grigoris V Karamasis, John Davies, Ali Kordzadeh, Elafra Nour, Alun H Davies, Ankur Thapar, Thomas Keeble
{"title":"Invasive Physiological Assessment of Lower Limb Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Sarosh Khan, Samer Fawaz, Uzma Sajjad, Christopher Cook, Grigoris V Karamasis, John Davies, Ali Kordzadeh, Elafra Nour, Alun H Davies, Ankur Thapar, Thomas Keeble","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12020077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects over 236 million people globally, with endovascular treatment as the predominant mode of revascularization. While pre-procedural lesion assessment typically relies on non-invasive Doppler measurement, invasive physiological assessment offers a promising approach to guide lesion selection and provide real-time evaluation of angioplasty success. This review explores the current methods, challenges, and future directions of invasive physiological assessment in PAD. Sensor-tipped wires, particularly pressure sensor-tipped wires (pressure-wires), enable precise evaluation of stenoses through indices such as peripheral fractional flow reserve (pFFR) measured during hyperaemia. pFFR can identify significant flow-limiting lesions, assess angioplasty efficacy, and predict tissue healing. Additional indices, including Doppler-wire derived flow reserves and resistance measurements, further enhance the understanding of lesion physiology. Early data support the utility of these techniques for guiding treatment decisions, although the variability in methodologies highlights the need for standardization and outcome-driven cut-off values. This review uniquely consolidates evidence on invasive physiological assessment in PAD, addressing critical gaps and providing a framework for future research. By advancing lesion-specific evaluation and procedural optimization, this work underscores the transformative potential of these techniques in improving patient outcomes and redefining PAD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12020077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects over 236 million people globally, with endovascular treatment as the predominant mode of revascularization. While pre-procedural lesion assessment typically relies on non-invasive Doppler measurement, invasive physiological assessment offers a promising approach to guide lesion selection and provide real-time evaluation of angioplasty success. This review explores the current methods, challenges, and future directions of invasive physiological assessment in PAD. Sensor-tipped wires, particularly pressure sensor-tipped wires (pressure-wires), enable precise evaluation of stenoses through indices such as peripheral fractional flow reserve (pFFR) measured during hyperaemia. pFFR can identify significant flow-limiting lesions, assess angioplasty efficacy, and predict tissue healing. Additional indices, including Doppler-wire derived flow reserves and resistance measurements, further enhance the understanding of lesion physiology. Early data support the utility of these techniques for guiding treatment decisions, although the variability in methodologies highlights the need for standardization and outcome-driven cut-off values. This review uniquely consolidates evidence on invasive physiological assessment in PAD, addressing critical gaps and providing a framework for future research. By advancing lesion-specific evaluation and procedural optimization, this work underscores the transformative potential of these techniques in improving patient outcomes and redefining PAD management.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢外周动脉疾病的侵入性生理评估:综述。
外周动脉疾病(PAD)影响全球超过2.36亿人,血管内治疗是主要的血运重建模式。虽然术前病变评估通常依赖于无创多普勒测量,但有创生理评估为指导病变选择和提供血管成形术成功的实时评估提供了有希望的方法。本文综述了目前PAD侵袭性生理评估的方法、挑战和未来发展方向。传感器尖端导线,特别是压力传感器尖端导线(压力导线),可以通过充血期间测量的外周分数血流储备(pFFR)等指标来精确评估狭窄。pFFR可以识别明显的血流受限病变,评估血管成形术的疗效,并预测组织愈合。其他指标,包括多普勒线衍生的血流储量和阻力测量,进一步增强了对病变生理学的理解。早期数据支持这些技术在指导治疗决策方面的效用,尽管方法的可变性突出了标准化和结果驱动的临界值的必要性。本综述独特地巩固了PAD侵袭性生理评估的证据,解决了关键空白,并为未来的研究提供了框架。通过推进病变特异性评估和程序优化,这项工作强调了这些技术在改善患者预后和重新定义PAD管理方面的变革潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
期刊最新文献
Vertical Right Axillary Thoracotomy for Repair of Ventricular Septal Defects in Infants and Children: Experience with 50 Consecutive Cases. Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Balancing Embolic Stroke and Intracerebral Hemorrhage Risk in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Southern Italy: A Retrospective Analysis of 11,653 Cases. Single-Site Experience in the ONSET-OFFSET Study Demonstrates Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Advantages of Ticagrelor over Clopidogrel in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes. Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Very Elderly Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Procedures: A Case Report and Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1