Local structural flexibility drives oligomorphism in computationally designed protein assemblies

Alena Khmelinskaia, Neville P. Bethel, Farzad Fatehi, Bhoomika Basu Mallik, Aleksandar Antanasijevic, Andrew J. Borst, Szu-Hsueh Lai, Ho Yeung Chim, Jing Yang ‘John’ Wang, Marcos C. Miranda, Andrew M. Watkins, Cassandra Ogohara, Shane Caldwell, Mengyu Wu, Albert J. R. Heck, David Veesler, Andrew B. Ward, David Baker, Reidun Twarock, Neil P. King
{"title":"Local structural flexibility drives oligomorphism in computationally designed protein assemblies","authors":"Alena Khmelinskaia, Neville P. Bethel, Farzad Fatehi, Bhoomika Basu Mallik, Aleksandar Antanasijevic, Andrew J. Borst, Szu-Hsueh Lai, Ho Yeung Chim, Jing Yang ‘John’ Wang, Marcos C. Miranda, Andrew M. Watkins, Cassandra Ogohara, Shane Caldwell, Mengyu Wu, Albert J. R. Heck, David Veesler, Andrew B. Ward, David Baker, Reidun Twarock, Neil P. King","doi":"10.1038/s41594-025-01490-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many naturally occurring protein assemblies have dynamic structures that allow them to perform specialized functions. Although computational methods for designing novel self-assembling proteins have advanced substantially over the past decade, they primarily focus on designing static structures. Here we characterize three distinct computationally designed protein assemblies that exhibit unanticipated structural diversity arising from flexibility in their subunits. Cryo-EM single-particle reconstructions and native mass spectrometry reveal two distinct architectures for two assemblies, while six cryo-EM reconstructions for the third likely represent a subset of its solution-phase structures. Structural modeling and molecular dynamics simulations indicate that constrained flexibility within the subunits of each assembly promotes a defined range of architectures rather than nonspecific aggregation. Redesigning the flexible region in one building block rescues the intended monomorphic assembly. These findings highlight structural flexibility as a powerful design principle, enabling exploration of new structural and functional spaces in protein assembly design.</p>","PeriodicalId":18822,"journal":{"name":"Nature structural & molecular biology","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature structural & molecular biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-025-01490-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many naturally occurring protein assemblies have dynamic structures that allow them to perform specialized functions. Although computational methods for designing novel self-assembling proteins have advanced substantially over the past decade, they primarily focus on designing static structures. Here we characterize three distinct computationally designed protein assemblies that exhibit unanticipated structural diversity arising from flexibility in their subunits. Cryo-EM single-particle reconstructions and native mass spectrometry reveal two distinct architectures for two assemblies, while six cryo-EM reconstructions for the third likely represent a subset of its solution-phase structures. Structural modeling and molecular dynamics simulations indicate that constrained flexibility within the subunits of each assembly promotes a defined range of architectures rather than nonspecific aggregation. Redesigning the flexible region in one building block rescues the intended monomorphic assembly. These findings highlight structural flexibility as a powerful design principle, enabling exploration of new structural and functional spaces in protein assembly design.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Human polymerase θ helicase positions DNA microhomologies for double-strand break repair Structures of a natural circularly permuted group II intron reveal mechanisms of branching and backsplicing A PAR6–aPKC–LGL structure reveals how LGL antagonizes aPKC Local structural flexibility drives oligomorphism in computationally designed protein assemblies Structure of the human K2P13.1 channel reveals a hydrophilic pore restriction and lipid cofactor site
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1