Meta-Synthesis of Professional Development Researches for In-Service Science Teachers

IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Journal of Education Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1111/ejed.70047
Filiz Gülhan
{"title":"Meta-Synthesis of Professional Development Researches for In-Service Science Teachers","authors":"Filiz Gülhan","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Since science education is a field that is open to current developments due to its nature, science educators need to be in a professional development process that frequently updates themselves. In this study, a metasynthesis of studies focusing on in-service professional development for science teachers was made. Content analysis, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the examination of 37 articles that met the criteria. It had been observed that descriptive studies the current situations are mostly on “general evaluation of in-service professional development programs”. It has been found that negative thoughts are at the forefront in the results of research findings in this aim. It has been determined that the most frequently studied themes involving experimental procedure researches on professional development practices for teachers are “in-service training practice and evaluation” and “collaborative practices” and positive results have been obtained from these studies. The theme of “collaboration” for science teachers' professional development has come to the fore in both descriptive and involving experimental procedure research. In the light of the results of the research, suggestions were made with the idea that there should be more studies that examine “the teacher as a part of a social structure” rather than “individual professional development” prepared by considering the teacher as an individual separate from the student and the school.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since science education is a field that is open to current developments due to its nature, science educators need to be in a professional development process that frequently updates themselves. In this study, a metasynthesis of studies focusing on in-service professional development for science teachers was made. Content analysis, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the examination of 37 articles that met the criteria. It had been observed that descriptive studies the current situations are mostly on “general evaluation of in-service professional development programs”. It has been found that negative thoughts are at the forefront in the results of research findings in this aim. It has been determined that the most frequently studied themes involving experimental procedure researches on professional development practices for teachers are “in-service training practice and evaluation” and “collaborative practices” and positive results have been obtained from these studies. The theme of “collaboration” for science teachers' professional development has come to the fore in both descriptive and involving experimental procedure research. In the light of the results of the research, suggestions were made with the idea that there should be more studies that examine “the teacher as a part of a social structure” rather than “individual professional development” prepared by considering the teacher as an individual separate from the student and the school.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在职科学教师专业发展研究的元综合
由于科学教育的本质是一个对当前发展开放的领域,科学教育者需要处于一个经常更新自己的专业发展过程中。本研究对科学教师在职专业发展的相关研究进行了综合分析。内容分析是一种定性研究方法,对37篇符合标准的文章进行了检验。人们注意到,目前的描述性研究大多是关于“在职专业发展方案的总体评价”。研究发现,在这方面的研究结果中,消极思想是最重要的。在教师专业发展实践的实验程序研究中,研究最多的主题是“在职培训实践与评价”和“合作实践”,并取得了积极的成果。科学教师专业发展的“协作”主题在描述性研究和涉及性实验程序研究中都已崭露头角。根据研究结果,建议应该更多地研究“教师作为社会结构的一部分”,而不是将教师视为独立于学生和学校的个体而准备的“个人专业发展”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
期刊最新文献
Correction to ‘Actualization of Interdisciplinary Integration at Mathematics Lessons’ Correction to ‘Actualization of Interdisciplinary Integration at Mathematics Lessons’ Perceived Principal Leadership and Work Engagement Among Chinese Primary School Teachers: The Roles of Occupational Stress and Job Crafting Perceived Principal Leadership and Work Engagement Among Chinese Primary School Teachers: The Roles of Occupational Stress and Job Crafting Digital Pedagogies in Music Education: Exploring Technology-Mediated Strategies for Creative Skill Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1