Haemorrhage-related adverse events profles of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab alone or in combination: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS database.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1186/s40360-025-00878-3
Shiqiao Wang, Guizhi Ren, Heng Pan, Jiayi Chen, Jiayu Huang, Qinghua Mei, Zhongze Li, Guosheng Zou
{"title":"Haemorrhage-related adverse events profles of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab alone or in combination: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS database.","authors":"Shiqiao Wang, Guizhi Ren, Heng Pan, Jiayi Chen, Jiayu Huang, Qinghua Mei, Zhongze Li, Guosheng Zou","doi":"10.1186/s40360-025-00878-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Limited understanding exists regarding the haemorrhagic risk resulting from potential interactions between lenvatinib and pembrolizumab. We investigated haemorrhagic adverse events (ADEs) associated with co-administration of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab using data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) in an effort to provide recommendations for their safe and sensible use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The FAERS database's bleeding events linked to lenvatinib and pembrolizumab were carefully examined. Haemorrhagic signals mining was performed by the reported odds ratios (RORs) and information component (IC), corroborated by additive and multiplicative models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 38,416,055 adverse event cases were analyzed, with 1188 bleeding events records in the lenvatinib alone, 952 bleeding events records in the pembrolizumab alone and 420 bleeding events reports in the combination therapy, respectively. We observed a significantly higher risk of haemorrhage with the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab compare with pembrolizumab alone. In addition, in the baseline model analysis of suspected bleeding adverse reactions, the additive model detected an increased incidence of small intestinal haemorrhage caused by combination therapy, and found no risk signals of tumour haemorrhage and tracheal haemorrhage; the results of multiplicative model are all negative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis of FAERS data reveals different levels of haemorrhagic risk when lenvatinib and pembrolizumab are administered concurrently, highlighting the significance of being cautious when using them in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9023,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":"26 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-025-00878-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Limited understanding exists regarding the haemorrhagic risk resulting from potential interactions between lenvatinib and pembrolizumab. We investigated haemorrhagic adverse events (ADEs) associated with co-administration of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab using data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) in an effort to provide recommendations for their safe and sensible use.

Methods: The FAERS database's bleeding events linked to lenvatinib and pembrolizumab were carefully examined. Haemorrhagic signals mining was performed by the reported odds ratios (RORs) and information component (IC), corroborated by additive and multiplicative models.

Results: A total of 38,416,055 adverse event cases were analyzed, with 1188 bleeding events records in the lenvatinib alone, 952 bleeding events records in the pembrolizumab alone and 420 bleeding events reports in the combination therapy, respectively. We observed a significantly higher risk of haemorrhage with the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab compare with pembrolizumab alone. In addition, in the baseline model analysis of suspected bleeding adverse reactions, the additive model detected an increased incidence of small intestinal haemorrhage caused by combination therapy, and found no risk signals of tumour haemorrhage and tracheal haemorrhage; the results of multiplicative model are all negative.

Conclusion: The analysis of FAERS data reveals different levels of haemorrhagic risk when lenvatinib and pembrolizumab are administered concurrently, highlighting the significance of being cautious when using them in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACYTOXICOLOGY&nb-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of chemically defined therapeutic and toxic agents. The journal welcomes submissions from all fields of experimental and clinical pharmacology including clinical trials and toxicology.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Effects of cypermethrin exposure on learning and memory functions and anxiety-like behavior in rats. Haemorrhage-related adverse events profles of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab alone or in combination: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS database. Real world results of ibrutinib in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a meta-analysis of clinical studies. Neuroprotective effects of berberine in preclinical models of ischemic stroke: a systematic review. Real-world safety analysis of deutetrabenazine post-marketing: a disproportionality study leveraging the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1