Development and Validation of Facial Line Distress Scale-Glabellar Lines (FINE-GL).

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-02-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S497415
Danbee Kang, Eunjee Kang, Kyeongrok Choi, Sooyeon Kim, Woo Shun Lee, Juhee Cho
{"title":"Development and Validation of Facial Line Distress Scale-Glabellar Lines (FINE-GL).","authors":"Danbee Kang, Eunjee Kang, Kyeongrok Choi, Sooyeon Kim, Woo Shun Lee, Juhee Cho","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S497415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We developed and validated facial line distress scale-glabellar lines (FINE-GL) to evaluate the severity and psychosocial distress associated with GL.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In Phase I, a preliminary item pool for the FINE-GL was developed through a literature review and expert consultation. This was followed by cognitive interviews to ensure comprehensibility of the items. In Phase II, we conducted a cross-sectional survey at a tertiary hospital and two local clinics in Korea. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify the underlying factor structure of the FINE-GL, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability were also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We yielded 20 items in four domains. The model fit was good. Coefficient alphas ranged from 0.92 to 0.95 for sub-domains and 0.97 for the total. The FINE-GL was moderately correlated with the appearance appraisal score and body image. In the test-retest, the range of ICC was 0.77-0.90.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FINE-GL is a reliable, valid, and comprehensive patient-reported outcome measure for assessing GL severity and distress. This will be helpful to determine a patient's eligibility for inclusion of study and to measure primary or secondary effectiveness endpoints for glabellar line treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"419-429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853867/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S497415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We developed and validated facial line distress scale-glabellar lines (FINE-GL) to evaluate the severity and psychosocial distress associated with GL.

Patients and methods: In Phase I, a preliminary item pool for the FINE-GL was developed through a literature review and expert consultation. This was followed by cognitive interviews to ensure comprehensibility of the items. In Phase II, we conducted a cross-sectional survey at a tertiary hospital and two local clinics in Korea. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify the underlying factor structure of the FINE-GL, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability were also examined.

Results: We yielded 20 items in four domains. The model fit was good. Coefficient alphas ranged from 0.92 to 0.95 for sub-domains and 0.97 for the total. The FINE-GL was moderately correlated with the appearance appraisal score and body image. In the test-retest, the range of ICC was 0.77-0.90.

Conclusion: FINE-GL is a reliable, valid, and comprehensive patient-reported outcome measure for assessing GL severity and distress. This will be helpful to determine a patient's eligibility for inclusion of study and to measure primary or secondary effectiveness endpoints for glabellar line treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
期刊最新文献
"Doctor-Led, Patient-Centered": A Mixed-Method Research Comparing Patients' and Doctors' Treatment Outcome Choices for Chronic Low Back Pain. Impact of Antepartum Case-Based Learning on Glycemic Control and Self-Management Skills in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Patient-Centered Non-Parallel Quasi-Experimental Study. Implementing a Care Model for Bedridden Stroke Survivors: A Qualitative Study in Northeastern Thailand [Letter]. Patient Experiences and Preferences Regarding Medication Cost Discussions Among Heart Failure Patients in Singapore: A Qualitative Survey. Development and Validation of Facial Line Distress Scale-Glabellar Lines (FINE-GL).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1