Impact of Antepartum Case-Based Learning on Glycemic Control and Self-Management Skills in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Patient-Centered Non-Parallel Quasi-Experimental Study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-02-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S503359
Guifen Wen, Jinguo Zhai, Peixuan Wen, Fang Yang, Xiaoxia Xie
{"title":"Impact of Antepartum Case-Based Learning on Glycemic Control and Self-Management Skills in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Patient-Centered Non-Parallel Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Guifen Wen, Jinguo Zhai, Peixuan Wen, Fang Yang, Xiaoxia Xie","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S503359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a growing global concern. GDM increases the risk of complications in both mothers and infants, including preeclampsia, macrosomia, and a higher likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes later in life. This study aimed to assess whether integrating case-based learning (CBL) with traditional education could improve glycemic control and patient outcomes in women with GDM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This non-parallel quasi-experimental study compared CBL interventions with traditional education in GDM women. Pregnant women from September 2022 to March 2023 received only traditional education (control group), whereas those from April to September 2023 received both case-based and traditional education (intervention group). The primary outcomes included fasting and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose level changes after the intervention. The secondary outcomes included self-management behavior changes (Self-Management Scale for Women with GDM), self-efficacy (Pregnancy Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale), GDM understanding (self-developed questionnaire), satisfaction, pregnancy weight gain, and macrosomia incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 GDM women were included, with the intervention and control groups containing 70 participants each. The intervention group showed significantly greater reductions in fasting and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose levels than the control group (<i>p</i><0.001). In addition, the intervention group demonstrated notable improvements in self-management behaviors, GDM knowledge, and patient satisfaction. The incidence of macrosomia was also significantly lower in the intervention group (1.6% vs 10.8%, <i>p</i>=0.034), indicating better neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CBL could be incorporated into traditional education in GDM women to improve their self-management and self-efficacy for better glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes. Healthcare providers should be educated on the CBL and relevant policies should be developed to facilitate the implementation of CBL in the clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"451-462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S503359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a growing global concern. GDM increases the risk of complications in both mothers and infants, including preeclampsia, macrosomia, and a higher likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes later in life. This study aimed to assess whether integrating case-based learning (CBL) with traditional education could improve glycemic control and patient outcomes in women with GDM.

Methods: This non-parallel quasi-experimental study compared CBL interventions with traditional education in GDM women. Pregnant women from September 2022 to March 2023 received only traditional education (control group), whereas those from April to September 2023 received both case-based and traditional education (intervention group). The primary outcomes included fasting and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose level changes after the intervention. The secondary outcomes included self-management behavior changes (Self-Management Scale for Women with GDM), self-efficacy (Pregnancy Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale), GDM understanding (self-developed questionnaire), satisfaction, pregnancy weight gain, and macrosomia incidence.

Results: A total of 140 GDM women were included, with the intervention and control groups containing 70 participants each. The intervention group showed significantly greater reductions in fasting and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose levels than the control group (p<0.001). In addition, the intervention group demonstrated notable improvements in self-management behaviors, GDM knowledge, and patient satisfaction. The incidence of macrosomia was also significantly lower in the intervention group (1.6% vs 10.8%, p=0.034), indicating better neonatal outcomes.

Conclusion: CBL could be incorporated into traditional education in GDM women to improve their self-management and self-efficacy for better glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes. Healthcare providers should be educated on the CBL and relevant policies should be developed to facilitate the implementation of CBL in the clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Antepartum Case-Based Learning on Glycemic Control and Self-Management Skills in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Patient-Centered Non-Parallel Quasi-Experimental Study. Implementing a Care Model for Bedridden Stroke Survivors: A Qualitative Study in Northeastern Thailand [Letter]. Patient Experiences and Preferences Regarding Medication Cost Discussions Among Heart Failure Patients in Singapore: A Qualitative Survey. Development and Validation of Facial Line Distress Scale-Glabellar Lines (FINE-GL). Living with Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Levels: The Experiences of Patients and Caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1