Better generalization through distraction? Concurrent load reduces the size of the inverse base-rate effect.

IF 3.1 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.3758/s13423-025-02661-1
Lenard Dome, Andy J Wills
{"title":"Better generalization through distraction? Concurrent load reduces the size of the inverse base-rate effect.","authors":"Lenard Dome, Andy J Wills","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02661-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The inverse base-rate effect (IBRE) is an irrational phenomenon in predictive learning. It occurs when people try to generalize what they have experienced to novel and ambiguous events. This irrational generalization manifests as a preference for rare, unlikely outcomes in the face of ambiguity. At least two formal mathematical models of this irrational preference (EXIT, NNRAS) lead to a counter-intuitive prediction: the effect reduces under concurrent load. We tested this prediction across two experiments ( <math><msub><mi>N</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> </math> = 72, <math><msub><mi>M</mi> <mrow><mi>age</mi></mrow> </msub> </math> = 20.12; <math><msub><mi>N</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> = 160, <math><msub><mi>M</mi> <mrow><mi>age</mi></mrow> </msub> </math> = 20.88). We confirm the prediction, but only when participants were under an obvious time constraint. This empirical confirmation is as surprising as the prediction itself-irrationality reduces under increased task demands. Further, our data are more consistent with the NNRAS model than with EXIT, the most prominent model of the IBRE to date.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":"1776-1784"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02661-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The inverse base-rate effect (IBRE) is an irrational phenomenon in predictive learning. It occurs when people try to generalize what they have experienced to novel and ambiguous events. This irrational generalization manifests as a preference for rare, unlikely outcomes in the face of ambiguity. At least two formal mathematical models of this irrational preference (EXIT, NNRAS) lead to a counter-intuitive prediction: the effect reduces under concurrent load. We tested this prediction across two experiments ( N 1 = 72, M age = 20.12; N 2 = 160, M age = 20.88). We confirm the prediction, but only when participants were under an obvious time constraint. This empirical confirmation is as surprising as the prediction itself-irrationality reduces under increased task demands. Further, our data are more consistent with the NNRAS model than with EXIT, the most prominent model of the IBRE to date.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过分散注意力更好地概括?并发负载减少了反向基本速率效应的大小。
逆基础率效应(IBRE)是预测学习中的一种非理性现象。当人们试图将他们所经历的概括为新奇和模糊的事件时,就会发生这种情况。这种非理性的概括表现为在面对模糊性时偏爱罕见的、不太可能的结果。至少有两个关于这种非理性偏好的正式数学模型(EXIT, NNRAS)得出了一个反直觉的预测:在并发负载下,这种效应会降低。我们通过两个实验验证了这一预测(N 1 = 72, M年龄= 20.12;N 2 = 160, M年龄= 20.88)。我们证实了这一预测,但只有当参与者受到明显的时间限制时。这一实证证实和预测本身一样令人惊讶——在任务需求增加的情况下,非理性会减少。此外,我们的数据与NNRAS模型比EXIT模型更一致,EXIT模型是IBRE迄今为止最突出的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: The journal provides coverage spanning a broad spectrum of topics in all areas of experimental psychology. The journal is primarily dedicated to the publication of theory and review articles and brief reports of outstanding experimental work. Areas of coverage include cognitive psychology broadly construed, including but not limited to action, perception, & attention, language, learning & memory, reasoning & decision making, and social cognition. We welcome submissions that approach these issues from a variety of perspectives such as behavioral measurements, comparative psychology, development, evolutionary psychology, genetics, neuroscience, and quantitative/computational modeling. We particularly encourage integrative research that crosses traditional content and methodological boundaries.
期刊最新文献
You still intend to move: Inferred mental states imply motion to static body postures. Dissociating the relationship between time perception and decisions to delay gratification. The psychophysical limits of agency: Biological motion percepts are dramatically weakened in slow-moving displays. Let it go: How trusted reminders alter intention maintenance. Explaining success in Bayesian reasoning with the adaptive toolbox and expertise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1