Enhancing Professionalism Online (Netiquette) in Medical Schools: A Systematic Scoping Review.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development Pub Date : 2025-02-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23821205241255268
Donovan Kai Wei Ng, Jonathan Zhen Liang, Ruth Si Man Wong, Vijayprasanth Raveendran, Gillian Li Gek Phua, Warren Fong, Crystal Lim, Jamie Xuelian Zhou, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
{"title":"Enhancing Professionalism Online (Netiquette) in Medical Schools: A Systematic Scoping Review.","authors":"Donovan Kai Wei Ng, Jonathan Zhen Liang, Ruth Si Man Wong, Vijayprasanth Raveendran, Gillian Li Gek Phua, Warren Fong, Crystal Lim, Jamie Xuelian Zhou, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna","doi":"10.1177/23821205241255268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relaxing of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions has not seen the return to previous in-person teaching formats. As blended training continues to be used, there is emphasis on the need to better appreciate the expectations, etiquette, and professional code of conduct (\"netiquette\") surrounding online learning, especially in light of evidence that poor online professionalism compromises learning and clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review seeks to map regnant netiquette guidelines in medical schools that will inform and provide preliminary recommendations for a clinically relevant framework.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a systematic scoping review (SSR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Krishna's Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA)'s Constructivist ontological and Relativist epistemological lens was used to guide this SSR. The SEBA process involves 6 stages, including the <i>Systematic Approach, Split Approach, Jigsaw Perspective, Funneling, Analysis of evidence-based and non-data-driven literature</i>, and <i>Synthesis of the SSR in SEBA</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 7941 abstracts were reviewed, 198 full text articles were evaluated, and 83 articles were included. The analysis of the results revealed 4 key domains: (1) current guidelines, (2) manifestations, (3) contributing factors, and (4) implications. This SSR in SEBA highlights variability and gaps in current guidelines and reveals the impact of sociocultural factors on breaches in netiquette. Unsurprisingly, contextual and clinical considerations shape the contributory factors impacting lapses in netiquette and their implications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the data accrued, this article proposes basic guidelines on netiquette and measures to support their effective employment. This includes curricular adaptations, methods of teaching and enhancing engagement with the students and faculty training. Drawing on prevailing studies, it also recommends methods of assessing netiquette, online professionalism, and the learning environment. Suggestions are also made for future areas of study.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205241255268"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241255268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The relaxing of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions has not seen the return to previous in-person teaching formats. As blended training continues to be used, there is emphasis on the need to better appreciate the expectations, etiquette, and professional code of conduct ("netiquette") surrounding online learning, especially in light of evidence that poor online professionalism compromises learning and clinical practice.

Objectives: This review seeks to map regnant netiquette guidelines in medical schools that will inform and provide preliminary recommendations for a clinically relevant framework.

Design: This study is a systematic scoping review (SSR).

Methods: Krishna's Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA)'s Constructivist ontological and Relativist epistemological lens was used to guide this SSR. The SEBA process involves 6 stages, including the Systematic Approach, Split Approach, Jigsaw Perspective, Funneling, Analysis of evidence-based and non-data-driven literature, and Synthesis of the SSR in SEBA.

Results: In total, 7941 abstracts were reviewed, 198 full text articles were evaluated, and 83 articles were included. The analysis of the results revealed 4 key domains: (1) current guidelines, (2) manifestations, (3) contributing factors, and (4) implications. This SSR in SEBA highlights variability and gaps in current guidelines and reveals the impact of sociocultural factors on breaches in netiquette. Unsurprisingly, contextual and clinical considerations shape the contributory factors impacting lapses in netiquette and their implications.

Conclusions: Based on the data accrued, this article proposes basic guidelines on netiquette and measures to support their effective employment. This includes curricular adaptations, methods of teaching and enhancing engagement with the students and faculty training. Drawing on prevailing studies, it also recommends methods of assessing netiquette, online professionalism, and the learning environment. Suggestions are also made for future areas of study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强医学院校在线专业(网络礼仪):系统的范围审查。
背景:COVID-19大流行限制的放松并没有恢复到以前的面对面教学形式。随着混合培训的继续使用,人们强调需要更好地理解围绕在线学习的期望、礼仪和专业行为准则(“网络礼仪”),特别是考虑到有证据表明,糟糕的在线专业精神会损害学习和临床实践。目的:本综述旨在绘制医学院校的主流网络礼仪指南,为临床相关框架提供信息和初步建议。设计:本研究是一项系统的范围评估(SSR)。方法:采用克里希纳系统循证方法(SEBA)的建构主义本体论和相对主义认识论视角来指导本SSR。SEBA过程包括6个阶段:系统方法、分裂方法、拼图视角、漏斗法、循证与非数据驱动文献分析、SEBA中SSR的合成。结果:共审查摘要7941篇,评价全文198篇,纳入83篇。对结果的分析揭示了4个关键领域:(1)当前指南,(2)表现,(3)影响因素,(4)影响。SEBA的这一SSR突出了现行准则的可变性和差距,并揭示了社会文化因素对违反网络礼仪的影响。不出所料,环境和临床因素塑造了影响网络礼仪失当及其影响的促成因素。结论:根据所得数据,本文提出了网络礼仪的基本准则和支持其有效就业的措施。这包括课程调整、教学方法和加强与学生和教师培训的接触。根据流行的研究,它还推荐了评估网络礼仪、在线专业和学习环境的方法。并对今后的研究方向提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Four-Step Micro-Research Closed-Loop Model via Online Spreadsheets for Molecular Biology Experimental Teaching: A Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Case Study. Perceived Impact of Virtual Reality-Based Education for History-Taking and Physical Examination Skills among International Medical Graduates in Japan: A Feasible One-Group Pretest-Posttest Study. Factors Associated with Critical Thinking Disposition in Postgraduate Medical Students: A Cross-sectional Study. Moving Equity into Practice: Evaluation of an Online Asynchronous Continuing Medical Education Program for Rheumatology Care. Confidence in Radiological Skills and Perceived Adequacy of Radiology Training Among Medical Students and Interns in Palestine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1