Increasing Participation and Completion Rates in Questionnaire Surveys of Primary Care Patients: Cluster-Randomized Study.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Interactive Journal of Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.2196/67981
Paul Sebo, Benoit Tudrej, Augustin Bernard, Bruno Delaunay, Alexandra Dupuy, Claire Malavergne, Hubert Maisonneuve
{"title":"Increasing Participation and Completion Rates in Questionnaire Surveys of Primary Care Patients: Cluster-Randomized Study.","authors":"Paul Sebo, Benoit Tudrej, Augustin Bernard, Bruno Delaunay, Alexandra Dupuy, Claire Malavergne, Hubert Maisonneuve","doi":"10.2196/67981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Participation and completion rates in questionnaire-based surveys are often low.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess participation and completion rates for a survey using paper and mixed mode questionnaires with patients recruited by research assistants in primary care waiting rooms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cluster-randomized study, conducted in 2023 in France, involved 974 patients from 39 practices randomized into 4 groups: \"paper with incentive\" (n=251), \"paper without incentive\" (n=368), \"mixed mode with tablet\" (n=187), and \"mixed mode with QR code\" (n=168). Analyses compared the combined paper group with the 2 mixed mode groups and the \"paper with incentive\" and \"paper without incentive\" groups. Logistic regressions were used to analyze participation and completion rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 974 patients recruited, 822 (women: 536/821, 65.3%; median age 52, IQR 37-68 years) agreed to participate (participation rate=84.4%), with no significant differences between groups. Overall, 806 patients (98.1%) answered all 48 questions. Completion rates were highest in the combined paper group (99.8%) compared to mixed mode groups (96.8% for paper or tablet, 93.3% for paper or QR code; P<.001). There was no significant difference in completion rates between the \"paper with incentive\" and \"paper without incentive\" groups (100% vs 99.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recruiting patients in waiting rooms with research assistants resulted in high participation and completion rates across all groups. Mixed mode options did not enhance participation or completion rates but may offer logistical advantages. Future research should explore incentives and mixed-mode strategies in diverse settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e67981"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/67981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Participation and completion rates in questionnaire-based surveys are often low.

Objective: This study aims to assess participation and completion rates for a survey using paper and mixed mode questionnaires with patients recruited by research assistants in primary care waiting rooms.

Methods: This cluster-randomized study, conducted in 2023 in France, involved 974 patients from 39 practices randomized into 4 groups: "paper with incentive" (n=251), "paper without incentive" (n=368), "mixed mode with tablet" (n=187), and "mixed mode with QR code" (n=168). Analyses compared the combined paper group with the 2 mixed mode groups and the "paper with incentive" and "paper without incentive" groups. Logistic regressions were used to analyze participation and completion rates.

Results: Of the 974 patients recruited, 822 (women: 536/821, 65.3%; median age 52, IQR 37-68 years) agreed to participate (participation rate=84.4%), with no significant differences between groups. Overall, 806 patients (98.1%) answered all 48 questions. Completion rates were highest in the combined paper group (99.8%) compared to mixed mode groups (96.8% for paper or tablet, 93.3% for paper or QR code; P<.001). There was no significant difference in completion rates between the "paper with incentive" and "paper without incentive" groups (100% vs 99.7%).

Conclusions: Recruiting patients in waiting rooms with research assistants resulted in high participation and completion rates across all groups. Mixed mode options did not enhance participation or completion rates but may offer logistical advantages. Future research should explore incentives and mixed-mode strategies in diverse settings.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高初级保健患者问卷调查的参与率和完成率:分组随机研究
背景:问卷调查的参与率和完成率通常很低。目的:本研究旨在评估问卷调查的参与率和完成率,问卷调查由初级保健候诊室的研究助理招募。方法:本研究于2023年在法国开展,纳入来自39家诊所的974名患者,随机分为4组:“有激励论文”组(251人)、“无激励论文”组(368人)、“片剂混合模式”组(187人)、“二维码混合模式”组(168人)。分析比较了组合论文组与2种混合模式组以及“有激励论文”和“无激励论文”组。采用Logistic回归分析参与率和完成率。结果:在纳入的974例患者中,822例(女性:536/821,65.3%;中位年龄52岁,IQR 37-68岁)同意参加(参与率=84.4%),组间无显著差异。总的来说,806名患者(98.1%)回答了所有48个问题。与混合模式组相比,组合纸张组的完成率最高(99.8%)(纸张或平板电脑96.8%,纸张或二维码93.3%;结论:在有研究助理的候诊室招募患者,所有组的参与率和完成率都很高。混合模式选择不能提高参与率或完成率,但可能提供后勤优势。未来的研究应探索不同环境下的激励和混合模式策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Interactive Journal of Medical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Machine and Deep Learning for Detection of Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity From Accelerometer Data: Systematic Scoping Review. Sleep Disturbance and Its Association With Purchasing Behavior of COVID-19 Medicine Among the Public After the Adjustment of Zero-COVID Policy in China: Results From a Web-Based Survey Study. Correction: Digital Health for Australia: Bridging the Rural, Regional, and Remote Health Gap. A Proposed Taxonomy to Holistically Classify Employee Mental Health Programs: Qualitative Taxonomy Development Study. Effectiveness, facilitators and barriers of digital mental health services for First Nations Peoples in Australia: A systematic scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1