Prediction of individual treatment allocation between electroconvulsive therapy or ketamine using the Personalized Advantage Index

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES NPJ Digital Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1038/s41746-025-01523-3
Benjamin S. C. Wade, Ryan Pindale, James Luccarelli, Shuang Li, Robert C. Meisner, Stephen J. Seiner, Joan A. Camprodon, Michael E. Henry
{"title":"Prediction of individual treatment allocation between electroconvulsive therapy or ketamine using the Personalized Advantage Index","authors":"Benjamin S. C. Wade, Ryan Pindale, James Luccarelli, Shuang Li, Robert C. Meisner, Stephen J. Seiner, Joan A. Camprodon, Michael E. Henry","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01523-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and ketamine are effective treatments for depression; however, evidence-based guidelines are needed to inform individual treatment selection. We adapted the Personalized Advantage Index (PAI) using machine learning to predict optimal treatment assignment to ECT or ketamine using EHR data on 2506 ECT and 196 ketamine patients. Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) before and during acute treatment. Propensity score matching across treatments was used to address confounding by indication, yielding a sample of 392 patients (<i>n</i> = 196 per treatment). Models predicted differential minimum QIDS scores (min-QIDS) over acute treatment using pretreatment EHR measures and SHAP values identified prescriptive predictors. Patients with large PAI scores who received a predicted optimal had significantly lower min-QIDS compared to the non-optimal treatment group (mean difference = 1.19 [95% CI: 0.32, ∞], <i>t</i> = 2.25, <i>q</i> &lt; 0.05, <i>d</i> = 0.26). Our model identified candidate pretreatment factors to provide actionable, effective antidepressant treatment selection guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01523-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and ketamine are effective treatments for depression; however, evidence-based guidelines are needed to inform individual treatment selection. We adapted the Personalized Advantage Index (PAI) using machine learning to predict optimal treatment assignment to ECT or ketamine using EHR data on 2506 ECT and 196 ketamine patients. Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) before and during acute treatment. Propensity score matching across treatments was used to address confounding by indication, yielding a sample of 392 patients (n = 196 per treatment). Models predicted differential minimum QIDS scores (min-QIDS) over acute treatment using pretreatment EHR measures and SHAP values identified prescriptive predictors. Patients with large PAI scores who received a predicted optimal had significantly lower min-QIDS compared to the non-optimal treatment group (mean difference = 1.19 [95% CI: 0.32, ∞], t = 2.25, q < 0.05, d = 0.26). Our model identified candidate pretreatment factors to provide actionable, effective antidepressant treatment selection guidelines.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用个性化优势指数预测电惊厥治疗或氯胺酮的个体治疗分配
电休克疗法(ECT)和氯胺酮是治疗抑郁症的有效方法;然而,需要循证指南来指导个体治疗选择。我们利用2506名ECT和196名氯胺酮患者的电子病历数据,采用机器学习的个性化优势指数(PAI)来预测ECT或氯胺酮的最佳治疗分配。采用抑郁症状快速量表(QIDS)在急性治疗前和治疗期间评估抑郁症状。使用不同治疗的倾向评分匹配来解决适应症的混淆,产生了392例患者的样本(每种治疗n = 196)。模型使用预处理EHR测量和SHAP值预测急性治疗的差异最小QIDS评分(min-QIDS)。PAI评分较高且接受预测最佳治疗的患者min-QIDS显著低于非最佳治疗组(平均差异= 1.19 [95% CI: 0.32,∞],t = 2.25, q < 0.05, d = 0.26)。我们的模型确定了候选的预处理因素,以提供可操作的、有效的抗抑郁药物治疗选择指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
期刊最新文献
The challenges of implementing hybrid baselines for the interpretation of longitudinal behavioral data from individuals. Effects of the SES NXT intervention on mental health and well-being for children of divorce. Tracing the Pen: Electronic Health Records Amid the Rise of Generative AI. Cohort vs case-control design for transformer-based prediction of asthma exacerbations in mild asthma. Patch-to-slide fusion deep learning model for histological diagnosis of early pregnancy loss including hydatidiform mole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1