Direct oral anticoagulants versus no anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage with atrial fibrillation (PRESTIGE-AF): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

Roland Veltkamp, Eleni Korompoki, Kirsten H Harvey, Emily R Harvey, Cornelia Fießler, Uwe Malzahn, Viktoria Rücker, Joan Montaner, Valeria Caso, Igor Sibon, Peter Ringleb, Omid Halse, Klemens Hügen, Sabine Ullmann, Carolin Schuhmann, Gabriele Putz Todd, Kirsten Haas, Elena Palà, Stéphanie Debette, Morgane Lachaize, Robyn Lotto
{"title":"Direct oral anticoagulants versus no anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage with atrial fibrillation (PRESTIGE-AF): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial","authors":"Roland Veltkamp, Eleni Korompoki, Kirsten H Harvey, Emily R Harvey, Cornelia Fießler, Uwe Malzahn, Viktoria Rücker, Joan Montaner, Valeria Caso, Igor Sibon, Peter Ringleb, Omid Halse, Klemens Hügen, Sabine Ullmann, Carolin Schuhmann, Gabriele Putz Todd, Kirsten Haas, Elena Palà, Stéphanie Debette, Morgane Lachaize, Robyn Lotto","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00333-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce the rate of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation but the benefits and risks in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage are uncertain. We aimed to determine whether DOACs reduce the risk of ischaemic stroke without substantially increasing the risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage.<h3>Methods</h3>PRESTIGE-AF is a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 75 hospitals in six European countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage, atrial fibrillation, an indication for anticoagulation, and a score of 4 or less on the modified Rankin Scale. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to a DOAC or no anticoagulation, stratified by intracerebral haemorrhage location and sex. Only the events adjudication committee was masked to treatment allocation. The coprimary endpoints were first ischaemic stroke and first recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. Hierarchical testing for superiority and non-inferiority, respectively, was performed in the intention-to-treat population. The margin to establish non-inferiority regarding intracerebral haemorrhage was less than 1·735. The safety analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT03996772</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, and is complete.<h3>Findings</h3>Between May 31, 2019, and Nov 30, 2023, 319 participants were enrolled and 158 were randomly assigned to the DOAC group and 161 to the no anticoagulant group. Patients' median age was 79 years (IQR 73–83). 113 (35%) of 319 patients were female and 206 (65%) were male. Median follow-up was 1·4 years (IQR 0·7–2·3). First ischaemic stroke occurred less frequently in the DOAC group than in the no anticoagulant group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·05 [95% CI 0·01–0·36]; log-rank p&lt;0·0001). The rate of all ischaemic stroke events was 0·83 (95% CI 0·14–2·57) per 100 patient-years in the DOAC group versus 8·60 (5·43–12·80) per 100 patient-years in the no anticoagulant group. For first recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage, the DOAC group did not meet the prespecified HR for the non-inferiority margin of less than 1·735 (HR 10·89 [90% CI 1·95–60·72]; p=0·96). The event rate of all intracerebral haemorrhage was 5·00 (95% CI 2·68–8·39) per 100 patient-years in the DOAC group versus 0·82 (0·14–2·53) per 100 patient years in the no anticoagulant group. Serious adverse events occurred in 70 (44%) of 158 patients in the DOAC group and 89 (55%) of 161 patients in the no anticoagulant group. 16 (10%) patients in the DOAC group and 21 (13%) patients in the no anticoagulant group died. No patients died in the placebo group.<h3>Interpretation</h3>DOACs effectively prevent ischaemic strokes in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage with atrial fibrillation but a part of this benefit is offset by a substantially increased risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. To optimise stroke prevention in these vulnerable patients, further evidence from ongoing trials and a meta-analysis of randomised data is needed, as well as the evaluation of safer medical or mechanical alternatives for selected patients.<h3>Funding</h3>European Commission.","PeriodicalId":22898,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00333-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce the rate of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation but the benefits and risks in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage are uncertain. We aimed to determine whether DOACs reduce the risk of ischaemic stroke without substantially increasing the risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage.

Methods

PRESTIGE-AF is a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 75 hospitals in six European countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage, atrial fibrillation, an indication for anticoagulation, and a score of 4 or less on the modified Rankin Scale. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to a DOAC or no anticoagulation, stratified by intracerebral haemorrhage location and sex. Only the events adjudication committee was masked to treatment allocation. The coprimary endpoints were first ischaemic stroke and first recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. Hierarchical testing for superiority and non-inferiority, respectively, was performed in the intention-to-treat population. The margin to establish non-inferiority regarding intracerebral haemorrhage was less than 1·735. The safety analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03996772, and is complete.

Findings

Between May 31, 2019, and Nov 30, 2023, 319 participants were enrolled and 158 were randomly assigned to the DOAC group and 161 to the no anticoagulant group. Patients' median age was 79 years (IQR 73–83). 113 (35%) of 319 patients were female and 206 (65%) were male. Median follow-up was 1·4 years (IQR 0·7–2·3). First ischaemic stroke occurred less frequently in the DOAC group than in the no anticoagulant group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·05 [95% CI 0·01–0·36]; log-rank p<0·0001). The rate of all ischaemic stroke events was 0·83 (95% CI 0·14–2·57) per 100 patient-years in the DOAC group versus 8·60 (5·43–12·80) per 100 patient-years in the no anticoagulant group. For first recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage, the DOAC group did not meet the prespecified HR for the non-inferiority margin of less than 1·735 (HR 10·89 [90% CI 1·95–60·72]; p=0·96). The event rate of all intracerebral haemorrhage was 5·00 (95% CI 2·68–8·39) per 100 patient-years in the DOAC group versus 0·82 (0·14–2·53) per 100 patient years in the no anticoagulant group. Serious adverse events occurred in 70 (44%) of 158 patients in the DOAC group and 89 (55%) of 161 patients in the no anticoagulant group. 16 (10%) patients in the DOAC group and 21 (13%) patients in the no anticoagulant group died. No patients died in the placebo group.

Interpretation

DOACs effectively prevent ischaemic strokes in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage with atrial fibrillation but a part of this benefit is offset by a substantially increased risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. To optimise stroke prevention in these vulnerable patients, further evidence from ongoing trials and a meta-analysis of randomised data is needed, as well as the evaluation of safer medical or mechanical alternatives for selected patients.

Funding

European Commission.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直接口服抗凝剂与不使用抗凝剂预防脑出血合并心房颤动幸存者中风(presge - af):一项多中心、开放标签、随机、3期试验
背景:直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)可降低房颤患者的血栓栓塞率,但对脑出血幸存者的益处和风险尚不确定。我们的目的是确定DOACs是否在不显著增加复发性脑出血风险的情况下降低缺血性卒中的风险。sprestige - af是一项多中心、开放标签、随机、3期试验,在欧洲6个国家的75家医院进行。符合条件的患者年龄在18岁或以上,自发性脑出血,房颤,抗凝指征,改良Rankin量表评分为4分或以下。患者按脑出血部位和性别随机分配(1:1)到DOAC或不抗凝。只有赛事评审委员会被隐瞒了治疗分配。主要终点为首次缺血性卒中和首次复发性脑出血。在意向治疗人群中分别进行了优势和非劣效性的层次检验。颅内出血建立非劣效性的裕度小于1.735。安全性分析是在意向治疗人群中进行的。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT03996772,并且已经完成。在2019年5月31日至2023年11月30日期间,共招募了319名参与者,其中158人被随机分配到DOAC组,161人被分配到无抗凝剂组。患者中位年龄为79岁(IQR 73-83)。319例患者中女性113例(35%),男性206例(65%)。中位随访时间为1.4年(IQR为0.7 ~ 2.3)。DOAC组首次缺血性卒中发生率低于未使用抗凝剂组(危险比[HR] 0.05 [95% CI 0.01 - 0.36];log-rank术;0·0001)。DOAC组所有缺血性卒中事件发生率为0.83 (95% CI 0.14 - 2.57) / 100患者-年,而无抗凝剂组为8.60(5.43 - 12.80)/ 100患者-年。对于首次复发性脑出血,DOAC组未达到预定的HR,非劣效性边际小于1.735 (HR 10.89 [90% CI 1.95 - 60·72];p = 0·96)。DOAC组所有脑出血事件发生率为5.00 (95% CI 2.68 ~ 8.39) / 100患者年,而无抗凝剂组为0.82(0.14 ~ 2.53)/ 100患者年。DOAC组158例患者中有70例(44%)发生严重不良事件,无抗凝剂组161例患者中有89例(55%)发生严重不良事件。DOAC组16例(10%)死亡,未使用抗凝剂组21例(13%)死亡。安慰剂组没有患者死亡。doacs可以有效地预防脑出血合并心房颤动幸存者的缺血性中风,但这种益处的一部分被脑出血复发风险的大幅增加所抵消。为了优化这些易感患者的卒中预防,需要从正在进行的试验和随机数据的荟萃分析中获得进一步的证据,以及对选定患者进行更安全的医疗或机械替代方案的评估。FundingEuropean佣金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rocatinlimab atopic dermatitis in two global phase 3 clinical trials The medicine of…nuclear power plants Abortion: the possibilities of progress Offline: Reinvigorating One Health—merci! Lyon commitments aim to advance One Health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1