Enhancing representation of data-scarce reservoir-regulated river basins using a hybrid DL-process based approach

IF 6.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132895
Liangkun Deng , Xiang Zhang , Louise J. Slater
{"title":"Enhancing representation of data-scarce reservoir-regulated river basins using a hybrid DL-process based approach","authors":"Liangkun Deng ,&nbsp;Xiang Zhang ,&nbsp;Louise J. Slater","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>River discharge estimation in regulated river basins requires the inclusion of specific reservoir operation modules. However, human impacts remain challenging to depict in regions where upstream operational information (such as inflow and storage observations) is not available. Here, we develop a hybrid deep learning (DL)-process based approach that couples a conceptual hydrological model with simplified generic reservoir operation schemes and uses embedded neural networks (ENNs) to parameterize the conceptual model and optionally replace its reservoir operation module. We assess the ability of ENNs to compensate for the structural inability of simplified operation schemes to capture complex human impacts, while maintaining the advantage of minimal upstream operational record requirements. The hybrid models were tested across 43 regulated basins in the Continental USA in terms of their ability to simulate reservoir outflow, and evaluated in terms of their physical interpretability. Results show that the hybrid models outperformed both the conceptual and the LSTM models for outflow simulations, achieving a median NSE (KGE) of 0.648 (0.700) compared to 0.426 (0.415) for the conceptual models and 0.581 (0.636) for the LSTM model, with percentage improvements of 52.47 % (68.67 %) and 11.53 % (10.06 %) respectively. The dynamic parameterization by the ENNs compensates for the structural limitations of the simplified operation schemes to reproduce different operational patterns. Beyond their superior accuracy, the hybrid models also preserve physical interpretability, producing meaningful untrained internal variables such as inflow and evapotranspiration, and coherent parameters. The physical operation modules, while not improving final output accuracy, play a key role in supporting the physical interpretation of internal inflow processes. This highlights the importance of evaluating hybrid models comprehensively, rather than relying solely on final output performance. Our study offers deeper insights into hybrid modeling and provides a promising solution for system representation of data-scarce regulated river basins.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"655 ","pages":"Article 132895"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425002331","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

River discharge estimation in regulated river basins requires the inclusion of specific reservoir operation modules. However, human impacts remain challenging to depict in regions where upstream operational information (such as inflow and storage observations) is not available. Here, we develop a hybrid deep learning (DL)-process based approach that couples a conceptual hydrological model with simplified generic reservoir operation schemes and uses embedded neural networks (ENNs) to parameterize the conceptual model and optionally replace its reservoir operation module. We assess the ability of ENNs to compensate for the structural inability of simplified operation schemes to capture complex human impacts, while maintaining the advantage of minimal upstream operational record requirements. The hybrid models were tested across 43 regulated basins in the Continental USA in terms of their ability to simulate reservoir outflow, and evaluated in terms of their physical interpretability. Results show that the hybrid models outperformed both the conceptual and the LSTM models for outflow simulations, achieving a median NSE (KGE) of 0.648 (0.700) compared to 0.426 (0.415) for the conceptual models and 0.581 (0.636) for the LSTM model, with percentage improvements of 52.47 % (68.67 %) and 11.53 % (10.06 %) respectively. The dynamic parameterization by the ENNs compensates for the structural limitations of the simplified operation schemes to reproduce different operational patterns. Beyond their superior accuracy, the hybrid models also preserve physical interpretability, producing meaningful untrained internal variables such as inflow and evapotranspiration, and coherent parameters. The physical operation modules, while not improving final output accuracy, play a key role in supporting the physical interpretation of internal inflow processes. This highlights the importance of evaluating hybrid models comprehensively, rather than relying solely on final output performance. Our study offers deeper insights into hybrid modeling and provides a promising solution for system representation of data-scarce regulated river basins.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用基于混合dl过程的方法增强数据稀缺的水库调节河流流域的表示
调节流域的河流流量估算需要包含特定的水库运行模块。然而,在无法获得上游操作信息(如流入和储存观测)的地区,描述人类影响仍然具有挑战性。在这里,我们开发了一种基于混合深度学习(DL)过程的方法,该方法将概念水文模型与简化的通用水库运行方案相结合,并使用嵌入式神经网络(ENNs)对概念模型进行参数化,并可选择替换其水库运行模块。我们评估了enn的能力,以弥补简化操作方案的结构性缺陷,以捕捉复杂的人为影响,同时保持最小的上游操作记录要求的优势。该混合模型在美国大陆的43个调节盆地进行了测试,以评估其模拟油藏流出的能力,并评估了其物理可解释性。结果表明,混合模型在外流模拟中的表现优于概念模型和LSTM模型,其中位数NSE (KGE)为0.648(0.700),而概念模型的中位数NSE (KGE)为0.426 (0.415),LSTM模型的中位数NSE (KGE)为0.581(0.636),分别提高了52.47%(68.67%)和11.53%(10.06%)。enn的动态参数化补偿了简化操作方案的结构限制,以再现不同的操作模式。除了具有较高的准确性外,混合模型还保留了物理可解释性,产生了有意义的未经训练的内部变量,如入水量和蒸散量,以及相关参数。物理操作模块虽然不能提高最终输出的精度,但在支持内部流入过程的物理解释方面发挥了关键作用。这突出了综合评估混合动力模型的重要性,而不是仅仅依赖于最终输出性能。我们的研究为混合建模提供了更深入的见解,并为数据稀缺的受管制流域的系统表示提供了一个有希望的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
期刊最新文献
An exact solution for steady subsurface irrigation with free boundary A flood peak prediction in data-scarce mountain river basins considering the time distribution of rainfall A new approach for groundwater fluxes assessment in alluvial aquifers using active-DTS with a Brillouin-based sensor Latitude/elevation-dependent response of snow phenology to climate change in the Northern Hemisphere from 1972 to 2022 Daily river water levels from multi-mission altimetry: A reach-based regression method using the unique SWOT data geometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1