Abba Aliyu Kasim , Pei Leng , Yu-Xuan Li , Qian-Yu Liao , Yun-Jing Geng , Jianwei Ma , Yayong Sun , Xiaoning Song , Si-Bo Duan , Zhao-Liang Li
{"title":"Remote sensing of root zone soil moisture: A review of methods and products","authors":"Abba Aliyu Kasim , Pei Leng , Yu-Xuan Li , Qian-Yu Liao , Yun-Jing Geng , Jianwei Ma , Yayong Sun , Xiaoning Song , Si-Bo Duan , Zhao-Liang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The demand for accurate and reliable estimates of root zone soil moisture (RZSM) has been increasing because of the growing need to address global concerns, including climate change and food security. In recent decades, significant advances have been made for inferring RZSM from remotely sensed observations, providing many methods and products that are available for Earth science fields. However, there are conflicting views in the recent literature regarding the accuracy of these methods due to regional differences in climate, soil, and vegetation conditions, as well as variations in parameterization and calibration approaches. These techniques have not been adequately discussed and documented in the literature. This article comprehensively reviews the satellite-based RZSM estimation methods (however some methods are not exclusively remote sensing-based, but in theory satellite data can be applicable to them), discusses their basic principles, and highlights their strengths, weaknesses, and potential research directions. We categorize these methods into two groups: those that estimate RZSM with knowledge of surface soil moisture (SSM) and those that estimate RZSM without SSM knowledge. Although these methods show varying levels of accuracy, periodic review required to address neglected assumptions, modify algorithms, and develop new ones in line with technological advancements of the 21st Century. In addition, we adequately describe and compare the major satellite-based global RZSM products at present to understand their global and local patterns and uncover existing problems. This review will serve as a reference for scientists in various fields to make informed decisions on the preferred methods for estimating RZSM from remote sensing measurements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"656 ","pages":"Article 133002"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425003403","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The demand for accurate and reliable estimates of root zone soil moisture (RZSM) has been increasing because of the growing need to address global concerns, including climate change and food security. In recent decades, significant advances have been made for inferring RZSM from remotely sensed observations, providing many methods and products that are available for Earth science fields. However, there are conflicting views in the recent literature regarding the accuracy of these methods due to regional differences in climate, soil, and vegetation conditions, as well as variations in parameterization and calibration approaches. These techniques have not been adequately discussed and documented in the literature. This article comprehensively reviews the satellite-based RZSM estimation methods (however some methods are not exclusively remote sensing-based, but in theory satellite data can be applicable to them), discusses their basic principles, and highlights their strengths, weaknesses, and potential research directions. We categorize these methods into two groups: those that estimate RZSM with knowledge of surface soil moisture (SSM) and those that estimate RZSM without SSM knowledge. Although these methods show varying levels of accuracy, periodic review required to address neglected assumptions, modify algorithms, and develop new ones in line with technological advancements of the 21st Century. In addition, we adequately describe and compare the major satellite-based global RZSM products at present to understand their global and local patterns and uncover existing problems. This review will serve as a reference for scientists in various fields to make informed decisions on the preferred methods for estimating RZSM from remote sensing measurements.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.