{"title":"Preliminary experience in anesthetic management of patients undergoing auxiliary liver transplant according to the RAPID procedure","authors":"Marie-Hélène Lagios , Audrey Dieu , Loïc Benoit , Arnaud Steyaert , Virginie Montiel , Aude Vanbuggenhout , Lancelot Marique , Laurent Coubeau","doi":"10.1016/j.liver.2025.100268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>RAPID (Resection And Partial Liver Transplantation With Delayed Total Hepatectomy) is a novel two-stage surgical procedure, with only 23 reported cases, involving partial liver resection and transplantation of a left lobe (stage 1) followed by a delayed total hepatectomy (stage 2). The perioperative anesthetic management of these recipients presents unique challenges and has never been described so far.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We report on ten patients with unresectable liver metastases who underwent this procedure from a living donor in our center between May 2020 and April 2024. Retrospectively, we collected preoperative, graft-related, and intraoperative management data during stage 1 (S1) and stage 2 (S2), and postoperative outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results and discussion</h3><div>Recipients’ median age was 53 (50–57), median graft-to-recipient weight ratio 0.43 % (0.41–0.45), total ischemia time 82 min (75–105). No patients experienced postreperfusion syndrome. Median intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 36 h (27–48) after S1, 24 h (24–48) after S2. Median INR on POD 3 was 1.20 (1.13–1.29) after S1, 1.29 (1.16–1.70) after S2. Complications after S1 included portal thrombosis in one patient, and three required revision surgery. After S2, one patient required revision for hemostasis, and another developed acute kidney injury. This patient died on day 12 from bleeding post-thoracocentesis for pleural effusion. Six-month survival rate was 90 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These preliminary data, as a first step in developing perioperative management protocols for this innovative surgery, show good hemodynamic tolerance, no postreperfusion syndrome, and preserved liver function throughout the process. These results highlight the RAPID procedure's safety during surgery and postoperative course.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266696762500011X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
RAPID (Resection And Partial Liver Transplantation With Delayed Total Hepatectomy) is a novel two-stage surgical procedure, with only 23 reported cases, involving partial liver resection and transplantation of a left lobe (stage 1) followed by a delayed total hepatectomy (stage 2). The perioperative anesthetic management of these recipients presents unique challenges and has never been described so far.
Materials and methods
We report on ten patients with unresectable liver metastases who underwent this procedure from a living donor in our center between May 2020 and April 2024. Retrospectively, we collected preoperative, graft-related, and intraoperative management data during stage 1 (S1) and stage 2 (S2), and postoperative outcomes.
Results and discussion
Recipients’ median age was 53 (50–57), median graft-to-recipient weight ratio 0.43 % (0.41–0.45), total ischemia time 82 min (75–105). No patients experienced postreperfusion syndrome. Median intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 36 h (27–48) after S1, 24 h (24–48) after S2. Median INR on POD 3 was 1.20 (1.13–1.29) after S1, 1.29 (1.16–1.70) after S2. Complications after S1 included portal thrombosis in one patient, and three required revision surgery. After S2, one patient required revision for hemostasis, and another developed acute kidney injury. This patient died on day 12 from bleeding post-thoracocentesis for pleural effusion. Six-month survival rate was 90 %.
Conclusions
These preliminary data, as a first step in developing perioperative management protocols for this innovative surgery, show good hemodynamic tolerance, no postreperfusion syndrome, and preserved liver function throughout the process. These results highlight the RAPID procedure's safety during surgery and postoperative course.